Intracranial complications before and after endoscopic skull base reconstruction.

Richard J Harvey, Jacob E Smith, Sarah K Wise, Sunil J Patel, Bruce M Frankel, Rodney J Schlosser
{"title":"Intracranial complications before and after endoscopic skull base reconstruction.","authors":"Richard J Harvey,&nbsp;Jacob E Smith,&nbsp;Sarah K Wise,&nbsp;Sunil J Patel,&nbsp;Bruce M Frankel,&nbsp;Rodney J Schlosser","doi":"10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic skull base reconstruction (ESBR) has been widely accepted in the management of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. However, it is not the CSF leak itself but the potential for life-threatening intracranial complications (ICCs) that is of primary clinical concern. The risk of developing complications, such as meningitis, in a skull base defect is unknown. Many ESBR are multilayered soft tissue repairs, and long-term prevention of ICCs is not well described.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review and telephone consultation was used to assess patients who had an ESBR from 2002 to 2008. The incidence of an ICCs (meningitis, cerebral abscess, and pneumocephalus) and associated risk factors were assessed before and after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred six patients underwent ESBR (mean age (+/-SD), 47.7 +/- 18.5 years; range, 2-78 years) with 95.3% long-term follow-up (mean, 19.9 +/- 16.3 months). ICCs occurred in 21.7% of patients at presentation, in 2.8% of patients during the perioperative period (<2 weeks), and in one patient (0.9%) during the postoperative period. Risk factors for presenting with an ICC and meningitis were revision cases performed elsewhere (chi(2) = 9.10; p = 0.007) and leaking encephaloceles (chi(2) = 5.98; p = 0.014). Factors not associated with increased ICC were an active CSF leak at presentation (chi(2) = 3.03; p = 0.082) and previous radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ESBR offers an excellent long-term option in preventing subsequent ICC with low perioperative complications. ESBR is robust with delayed (>2weeks) CSF leakage occurring in only 1.9% regardless of etiology. The presence of identifiable risk factors for ICC may guide the surgeon in determining the urgency of ESBR.</p>","PeriodicalId":72175,"journal":{"name":"American journal of rhinology","volume":"22 5","pages":"516-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3223","citationCount":"70","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 70

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic skull base reconstruction (ESBR) has been widely accepted in the management of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. However, it is not the CSF leak itself but the potential for life-threatening intracranial complications (ICCs) that is of primary clinical concern. The risk of developing complications, such as meningitis, in a skull base defect is unknown. Many ESBR are multilayered soft tissue repairs, and long-term prevention of ICCs is not well described.

Methods: Retrospective chart review and telephone consultation was used to assess patients who had an ESBR from 2002 to 2008. The incidence of an ICCs (meningitis, cerebral abscess, and pneumocephalus) and associated risk factors were assessed before and after surgery.

Results: One hundred six patients underwent ESBR (mean age (+/-SD), 47.7 +/- 18.5 years; range, 2-78 years) with 95.3% long-term follow-up (mean, 19.9 +/- 16.3 months). ICCs occurred in 21.7% of patients at presentation, in 2.8% of patients during the perioperative period (<2 weeks), and in one patient (0.9%) during the postoperative period. Risk factors for presenting with an ICC and meningitis were revision cases performed elsewhere (chi(2) = 9.10; p = 0.007) and leaking encephaloceles (chi(2) = 5.98; p = 0.014). Factors not associated with increased ICC were an active CSF leak at presentation (chi(2) = 3.03; p = 0.082) and previous radiotherapy.

Conclusion: ESBR offers an excellent long-term option in preventing subsequent ICC with low perioperative complications. ESBR is robust with delayed (>2weeks) CSF leakage occurring in only 1.9% regardless of etiology. The presence of identifiable risk factors for ICC may guide the surgeon in determining the urgency of ESBR.

颅底重建前后颅内并发症。
背景:内镜下颅底重建(ESBR)已被广泛接受用于脑脊液(CSF)泄漏的治疗。然而,它不是脑脊液泄漏本身,而是潜在的危及生命的颅内并发症(ICCs)是主要的临床关注。颅底缺损发生并发症(如脑膜炎)的风险尚不清楚。许多ESBR是多层软组织修复,ICCs的长期预防尚未得到很好的描述。方法:采用回顾性图表法和电话咨询法对2002 ~ 2008年发生ESBR的患者进行评估。术前和术后评估ICCs(脑膜炎、脑脓肿和脑气)的发生率及相关危险因素。结果:106例患者行ESBR(平均年龄(+/- sd), 47.7 +/- 18.5岁;范围2-78年),长期随访95.3%(平均19.9±16.3个月)。21.7%的患者在首发时发生ICC, 2.8%的患者在围手术期发生ICC(结论:ESBR提供了一种极好的长期选择,可预防后续ICC,且围手术期并发症低。ESBR是稳健的,延迟(>2周)脑脊液渗漏的发生率仅为1.9%,无论病因如何。存在可识别的ICC危险因素可以指导外科医生确定ESBR的紧迫性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信