Machine learning classification procedure for selecting SNPs in genomic selection: application to early mortality in broilers.

N Long, D Gianola, G J M Rosa, K A Weigel, S Avendano
{"title":"Machine learning classification procedure for selecting SNPs in genomic selection: application to early mortality in broilers.","authors":"N Long,&nbsp;D Gianola,&nbsp;G J M Rosa,&nbsp;K A Weigel,&nbsp;S Avendano","doi":"10.1159/000317279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In genome-wide association studies using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), typically thousands of SNPs are genotyped, whereas the number of phenotypes for which there is genomic information may be smaller. Atwo-step SNP (feature) selection method was developed, which consisted of filtering (using information gain), and wrapping (using naïve Bayesian classification). This was based on discretization of the continuous phenotypic values. The method was applied to chick early mortality rates (0-14 days of age) on progeny from 201 sires in a commercial broiler line, with the goal of identifying SNPs (over 5000) related to progeny mortality. Sires were clustered into two groups, low and high, according to two arbitrarily chosen mortality rate thresholds. By varying these thresholds, 11 different \"case-control\" samples were formed, and the SNP selection procedure was applied to each sample. To compare the 11 sets of chosen SNPs, predicted residual sum of squares (PRESS)from a linear model was used. Naive Bayesian classification accuracy was improved over the case without feature selection (from 50% to 90%). Seventeen SNPs in the best case-control group (with smallest PRESS) accounted for 31% of the variance among sire family mortality rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":11190,"journal":{"name":"Developments in biologicals","volume":"132 ","pages":"373-376"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developments in biologicals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000317279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In genome-wide association studies using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), typically thousands of SNPs are genotyped, whereas the number of phenotypes for which there is genomic information may be smaller. Atwo-step SNP (feature) selection method was developed, which consisted of filtering (using information gain), and wrapping (using naïve Bayesian classification). This was based on discretization of the continuous phenotypic values. The method was applied to chick early mortality rates (0-14 days of age) on progeny from 201 sires in a commercial broiler line, with the goal of identifying SNPs (over 5000) related to progeny mortality. Sires were clustered into two groups, low and high, according to two arbitrarily chosen mortality rate thresholds. By varying these thresholds, 11 different "case-control" samples were formed, and the SNP selection procedure was applied to each sample. To compare the 11 sets of chosen SNPs, predicted residual sum of squares (PRESS)from a linear model was used. Naive Bayesian classification accuracy was improved over the case without feature selection (from 50% to 90%). Seventeen SNPs in the best case-control group (with smallest PRESS) accounted for 31% of the variance among sire family mortality rates.

基因组选择中选择snp的机器学习分类程序:在肉鸡早期死亡中的应用。
在使用单核苷酸多态性(snp)的全基因组关联研究中,通常有数千个snp被基因分型,而存在基因组信息的表型数量可能更少。提出了两步SNP (feature)选择方法,包括过滤(利用信息增益)和包裹(利用naïve贝叶斯分类)。这是基于连续表型值的离散化。该方法应用于某商品肉鸡品系201种母猪的雏鸡早期死亡率(0-14日龄),目的是确定与雏鸡死亡率相关的snp(超过5000个)。根据任意选择的两个死亡率阈值,将Sires分为低组和高组。通过改变这些阈值,形成11个不同的“病例对照”样本,并对每个样本应用SNP选择程序。为了比较11组选择的snp,使用线性模型的预测残差平方和(PRESS)。与没有特征选择的情况相比,朴素贝叶斯分类准确率得到了提高(从50%提高到90%)。最佳病例对照组(PRESS最小)的17个snp占家族死亡率差异的31%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信