Le devenir fonctionnel et la qualité de vie des ruptures de la coiffe des rotateurs non opérées

S. Ghroubi , M. Chaari , H. Elleuch , M. Guermazi , S. Baklouti , M.H. Elleuch
{"title":"Le devenir fonctionnel et la qualité de vie des ruptures de la coiffe des rotateurs non opérées","authors":"S. Ghroubi ,&nbsp;M. Chaari ,&nbsp;H. Elleuch ,&nbsp;M. Guermazi ,&nbsp;S. Baklouti ,&nbsp;M.H. Elleuch","doi":"10.1016/j.annrmp.2008.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Our objective was to determine the long-term functional and quality-of-life outcomes for patients with rotator cuff tears receiving conservative treatment. We also studied correlations between the Constant and SF-36 scores.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>This was a prospective survey carried out on patients having consulted in our Rehabilitation Department between January 1995 and December 2004 for radiologically-confirmed rotator cuff tears and having received medical treatment combined with a rehabilitation programme. The outcome measures used in our study were as follows: degree of motion, muscle strength, degree of pain on a visual analogical scale (VAS) and scores on the Constant and SF-36 scales.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study population consisted of 38 women and 21 men (mean age: 61 years; range 46–75). The mean final outcome measurements were taken after an average of seven years of follow-up (range: 4–12). The VAS score for pain at rest dropped from 68.3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->31 to 28.3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->12 (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->10<sup>−3</sup>) over the follow-up period. The score for pain during effort fell from 82.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->36 to 40.3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->15. In all cases, active joint mobility was better at the final assessment (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). The Constant score rose from 28.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->14.2 to 51.6<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->21.8. The SF36 score showed a 16% improvement. Sixty-two percent of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with this treatment. The change over time was rated as good to very good by 42 patients (71.8%). The observed improvement in quality of life was correlated with reduced pain at rest (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.62) and during effort (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.59) and with the increased Constant score.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our results underline the benefits (in terms of short- and long-term pain reduction, functional improvements and better quality of life) of an individualized rehabilitation programme (combined with medical treatment) in cases of rotator cuff tears.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72206,"journal":{"name":"Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.annrmp.2008.08.005","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168605408001761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Our objective was to determine the long-term functional and quality-of-life outcomes for patients with rotator cuff tears receiving conservative treatment. We also studied correlations between the Constant and SF-36 scores.

Material and methods

This was a prospective survey carried out on patients having consulted in our Rehabilitation Department between January 1995 and December 2004 for radiologically-confirmed rotator cuff tears and having received medical treatment combined with a rehabilitation programme. The outcome measures used in our study were as follows: degree of motion, muscle strength, degree of pain on a visual analogical scale (VAS) and scores on the Constant and SF-36 scales.

Results

The study population consisted of 38 women and 21 men (mean age: 61 years; range 46–75). The mean final outcome measurements were taken after an average of seven years of follow-up (range: 4–12). The VAS score for pain at rest dropped from 68.3 ± 31 to 28.3 ± 12 (p < 10−3) over the follow-up period. The score for pain during effort fell from 82.5 ± 36 to 40.3 ± 15. In all cases, active joint mobility was better at the final assessment (p < 0.001). The Constant score rose from 28.8 ± 14.2 to 51.6 ± 21.8. The SF36 score showed a 16% improvement. Sixty-two percent of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with this treatment. The change over time was rated as good to very good by 42 patients (71.8%). The observed improvement in quality of life was correlated with reduced pain at rest (r = 0.62) and during effort (r = 0.59) and with the increased Constant score.

Conclusion

Our results underline the benefits (in terms of short- and long-term pain reduction, functional improvements and better quality of life) of an individualized rehabilitation programme (combined with medical treatment) in cases of rotator cuff tears.

无手术旋转器头盖骨断裂的功能命运和生活质量
我们的目的是确定接受保守治疗的肩袖撕裂患者的长期功能和生活质量结果。我们还研究了常数和SF-36分数之间的相关性。材料和方法这是一项前瞻性调查,对象是1995年1月至2004年12月在我们康复科就诊的经放射学证实的肩袖撕裂患者,并接受了药物治疗和康复方案。在我们的研究中使用的结果测量如下:运动程度,肌肉力量,视觉类比量表(VAS)的疼痛程度以及Constant和SF-36量表的得分。结果研究人群包括38名女性和21名男性(平均年龄:61岁;46 - 75)范围。平均最终结果测量是在平均7年的随访(范围:4-12)后进行的。静息疼痛VAS评分由68.3±31降至28.3±12 (p <10−3)。用力时疼痛的评分从82.5±36下降到40.3±15。在所有病例中,最终评估时主动关节活动度更好(p <0.001)。Constant评分由28.8±14.2上升至51.6±21.8。SF36评分提高了16%。62%的患者对这种治疗感到满意或非常满意。42名患者(71.8%)评价其随时间的变化为良好至非常好。观察到的生活质量的改善与休息时(r = 0.62)和努力时(r = 0.59)疼痛的减轻以及Constant评分的增加相关。结论:我们的研究结果强调了个体化康复方案(结合药物治疗)对肩袖撕裂患者的益处(在短期和长期疼痛减轻、功能改善和更好的生活质量方面)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信