Oxidative damage to DNA in non-malignant disease: biomarker or biohazard?

Genome dynamics Pub Date : 2006-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000092500
M D Evans, M S Cooke
{"title":"Oxidative damage to DNA in non-malignant disease: biomarker or biohazard?","authors":"M D Evans,&nbsp;M S Cooke","doi":"10.1159/000092500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oxidative damage to DNA has been examined in many non-malignant conditions, in most cases for its utility as a marker of oxidative stress. Whilst this may prove useful, attempts to answer the question - why might oxidative damage be important in this disease? - would provide added value to the biomarker data, as well as give clues to pathogenesis and perhaps therapy. In this chapter, data from the scientific literature are considered broadly, where oxidative damage to DNA has been analysed either in tissues or in extracellular matrices, such as urine, in various groups of non-malignant disease. The lesion of primary focus is 8-hydroxy-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine, only because this is the most widely measured lesion. By coupling biomarker information with the characteristics of the disease and a set of general mechanisms whereby DNA oxidation may be pathogenic (retrospectively derived from the literature examined), we can ascribe pathogenic roles for DNA oxidation in various diseases. Based on available experimental evidence, for a wide range of conditions, such mechanisms would include prominent roles for the induction of mitochondrial dysfunction, promotion of cytotoxicity and modulation of inflammatory responses. Our general conclusion is that, dependent on the disease, oxidative DNA damage may be a biomarker, biohazard or both of these.</p>","PeriodicalId":87974,"journal":{"name":"Genome dynamics","volume":"1 ","pages":"53-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000092500","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000092500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Oxidative damage to DNA has been examined in many non-malignant conditions, in most cases for its utility as a marker of oxidative stress. Whilst this may prove useful, attempts to answer the question - why might oxidative damage be important in this disease? - would provide added value to the biomarker data, as well as give clues to pathogenesis and perhaps therapy. In this chapter, data from the scientific literature are considered broadly, where oxidative damage to DNA has been analysed either in tissues or in extracellular matrices, such as urine, in various groups of non-malignant disease. The lesion of primary focus is 8-hydroxy-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine, only because this is the most widely measured lesion. By coupling biomarker information with the characteristics of the disease and a set of general mechanisms whereby DNA oxidation may be pathogenic (retrospectively derived from the literature examined), we can ascribe pathogenic roles for DNA oxidation in various diseases. Based on available experimental evidence, for a wide range of conditions, such mechanisms would include prominent roles for the induction of mitochondrial dysfunction, promotion of cytotoxicity and modulation of inflammatory responses. Our general conclusion is that, dependent on the disease, oxidative DNA damage may be a biomarker, biohazard or both of these.

非恶性疾病中DNA氧化损伤:生物标志物还是生物危害?
DNA的氧化损伤已经在许多非恶性条件下进行了检查,在大多数情况下,它作为氧化应激的标志。虽然这可能被证明是有用的,但试图回答这个问题——为什么氧化损伤在这种疾病中很重要?-将为生物标志物数据提供附加价值,并为发病机制和治疗提供线索。在本章中,来自科学文献的数据被广泛地考虑,其中分析了组织或细胞外基质(如尿液)中各种非恶性疾病中DNA的氧化损伤。主要病灶是8-羟基-7,8-二氢-2'-脱氧鸟苷,只是因为这是最广泛测量的病变。通过将生物标志物信息与疾病特征和一套DNA氧化可能致病的一般机制(回顾性地从文献中得出)结合起来,我们可以将DNA氧化在各种疾病中的致病作用归因于DNA氧化。根据现有的实验证据,在广泛的条件下,这些机制将包括诱导线粒体功能障碍、促进细胞毒性和调节炎症反应的突出作用。我们的总体结论是,根据疾病的不同,氧化DNA损伤可能是一种生物标志物,也可能是一种生物危害,或者两者兼而有之。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信