Hippocrates revisited? Old ideals and new realities.

IF 3.5 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Genomic medicine Pub Date : 2008-01-01 Epub Date: 2008-05-14 DOI:10.1007/s11568-008-9020-2
Jeantine E Lunshof, Ruth Chadwick, George M Church
{"title":"Hippocrates revisited? Old ideals and new realities.","authors":"Jeantine E Lunshof,&nbsp;Ruth Chadwick,&nbsp;George M Church","doi":"10.1007/s11568-008-9020-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individual genomics has arrived, personal decisions to make use of it are a new reality. What are the implications for the patient-physician relationship? In this article we address three factors that call the traditional concept of confidentiality into question. First, the illusion of absolute data safety, as shown by medical informatics. Second, data sharing as a standard practice in genomics research. Comprehensive data sets are widely accessible. Third, genotyping has become a service that is directly available to consumers. The availability and accessibility of personal health data strongly suggest that the roles in the clinical encounter need to be remodeled. The old ideal of physicians as keepers of confidential information is outstripped by the reality of individuals who decide themselves about the way of using their data.</p>","PeriodicalId":87975,"journal":{"name":"Genomic medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11568-008-9020-2","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genomic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11568-008-9020-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Individual genomics has arrived, personal decisions to make use of it are a new reality. What are the implications for the patient-physician relationship? In this article we address three factors that call the traditional concept of confidentiality into question. First, the illusion of absolute data safety, as shown by medical informatics. Second, data sharing as a standard practice in genomics research. Comprehensive data sets are widely accessible. Third, genotyping has become a service that is directly available to consumers. The availability and accessibility of personal health data strongly suggest that the roles in the clinical encounter need to be remodeled. The old ideal of physicians as keepers of confidential information is outstripped by the reality of individuals who decide themselves about the way of using their data.

希波克拉底吗?旧的理想和新的现实。
个人基因组学已经到来,个人决定利用它是一个新的现实。这对医患关系有什么影响?在这篇文章中,我们讨论了使传统的保密概念受到质疑的三个因素。首先,数据绝对安全的错觉,正如医学信息学所显示的那样。第二,数据共享是基因组学研究的标准做法。全面的数据集可广泛获取。第三,基因分型已经成为消费者可以直接获得的一项服务。个人健康数据的可用性和可访问性强烈表明,在临床遇到的角色需要重塑。医生作为机密信息保管人的旧理想已经被个人自行决定使用数据方式的现实所超越。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信