{"title":"I don't think general practice should be the front line: Experiences of general practitioners working with refugees in South Australia.","authors":"David R Johnson, Anna M Ziersch, Teresa Burgess","doi":"10.1186/1743-8462-5-20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many refugees arrive in Australia with complex health needs. In South Australia (SA), providing initial health care to refugees is the responsibility of General Practitioners (GPs) in private practice. Their capacity to perform this work effectively for current newly arrived refugees is uncertain. The aim of this study was to document the challenges faced by GPs in private practice in SA when providing initial care to refugees and to discuss the implications of this for policy relating to optimising health care services for refugees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews with twelve GPs in private practice and three Medical Directors of Divisions of General Practice. Using a template analysis approach the interviews were coded and analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multiple challenges providing care to refugees were found including those related to: (1) refugee health issues; (2) the GP-refugee interaction; and (3) the structure of general practice. The Divisions also reported challenges assisting GPs to provide effective care related to a lack of funding and awareness of which GPs required support. Although respondents suggested a number of ways that GPs could be assisted to provide better initial care to refugees, strong support was voiced for the initial care of refugees to be provided via a specialist refugee health service.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPs in this study were under-resourced, at both an individual GP level as well as a structural level, to provide effective initial care for refugees. In SA, there are likely to be a number of challenges attempting to increase the capacity of GPs in private practice to provide initial care. An alternative model is for refugees with multiple and complex health care needs as well as those with significant resettlement challenges to receive initial health care via the existing specialist refugee health service in Adelaide.</p>","PeriodicalId":87170,"journal":{"name":"Australia and New Zealand health policy","volume":"5 ","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1743-8462-5-20","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australia and New Zealand health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-5-20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Introduction: Many refugees arrive in Australia with complex health needs. In South Australia (SA), providing initial health care to refugees is the responsibility of General Practitioners (GPs) in private practice. Their capacity to perform this work effectively for current newly arrived refugees is uncertain. The aim of this study was to document the challenges faced by GPs in private practice in SA when providing initial care to refugees and to discuss the implications of this for policy relating to optimising health care services for refugees.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews with twelve GPs in private practice and three Medical Directors of Divisions of General Practice. Using a template analysis approach the interviews were coded and analysed thematically.
Results: Multiple challenges providing care to refugees were found including those related to: (1) refugee health issues; (2) the GP-refugee interaction; and (3) the structure of general practice. The Divisions also reported challenges assisting GPs to provide effective care related to a lack of funding and awareness of which GPs required support. Although respondents suggested a number of ways that GPs could be assisted to provide better initial care to refugees, strong support was voiced for the initial care of refugees to be provided via a specialist refugee health service.
Conclusion: GPs in this study were under-resourced, at both an individual GP level as well as a structural level, to provide effective initial care for refugees. In SA, there are likely to be a number of challenges attempting to increase the capacity of GPs in private practice to provide initial care. An alternative model is for refugees with multiple and complex health care needs as well as those with significant resettlement challenges to receive initial health care via the existing specialist refugee health service in Adelaide.
导言:许多抵达澳大利亚的难民都有复杂的健康需求。在南澳大利亚州(SA),向难民提供初级保健是私人执业的全科医生(gp)的责任。它们是否有能力为目前新抵达的难民有效地开展这项工作,目前还不确定。本研究的目的是记录南澳大利亚州私人执业的全科医生在为难民提供初步护理时所面临的挑战,并讨论这对优化难民保健服务相关政策的影响。方法:对12名私人执业的全科医生和3名全科科室的医学主任进行半结构化访谈。使用模板分析方法对访谈进行编码和主题分析。结果:发现向难民提供护理的多重挑战,包括与以下方面有关的挑战:(1)难民健康问题;(2) gdp -难民互动;(3)全科医生的结构。各司还报告了协助全科医生提供有效护理的挑战,这些挑战与缺乏资金和对全科医生需要支持的认识有关。虽然答复者提出了一些办法,可以协助全科医生向难民提供更好的初步护理,但他们强烈支持通过专门的难民保健服务向难民提供初步护理。结论:本研究中的全科医生资源不足,无论是在个人层面还是在结构层面,都无法为难民提供有效的初始护理。在南澳州,可能会有一些挑战,试图增加私人执业的全科医生的能力,以提供初步护理。另一种模式是,有多种复杂保健需求的难民以及在重新安置方面面临重大挑战的难民,可通过阿德莱德现有的专门难民保健服务机构获得初步保健。