How to implement traceability of creatinine results: a manufacturer's experience.

Hans-Joachim Kytzia
{"title":"How to implement traceability of creatinine results: a manufacturer's experience.","authors":"Hans-Joachim Kytzia","doi":"10.1080/00365510802149937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1997, Roche Diagnostics introduced an enzymatic creatinine test based on the enzymatic conversion of creatinine via creatine to sarcosine and on the quantification of sarcosine by a Trinder method involving sarcosine oxidase, peroxidase and aminoantipyrine. This method is a priori free of the well-known unspecific reactions of the classical ‘‘Creatinine Jaffe’’ method. Owing to the use of established techniques, it does not give a colour reaction with endogenous creatine and shows little or no interference from substances known to interfere with the Trinder reaction. As a consequence, a method comparison performed with 95 human sera gave a very good correlation with negligible intercept to the reference method isotope-dilution mass spectrometry (ID-MS; Figure 1). A comparable correlation could not be obtained in the past with the Roche/Hitachi Jaffe method (Figure 2). The discrepancy between the Jaffe and the ID-MS creatinine results is caused by the reaction of the alkaline picrate reagent with a variety of endogenous sample components in addition to that with creatinine. This results in an intercept in the method comparison that cannot be corrected by routine calibration procedures. However, the difference is fairly constant at approximately 26 mmol/L (0.3 mg/ dL) for serum or plasma samples over the entire measuring range. This finding led Roche Diagnostics to introduce the ‘‘Creatinine Jaffe compensated’’ method that automatically corrects each result by 224 mmol/L (20.27 mg/dL). Using this compensation in combination with a new standardization, an acceptable correlation with the reference method results is obtained with the Roche/Hitachi Jaffe method as well (Figure 3). While, with implementation of the Jaffe compensated method, the Creatinine routine methods showed satisfactory agreement with and the desired traceability to the reference method ID-MS, a new problem arose with estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Estimation of GFR is used in screening for chronic kidney disease. According to the recommendations of the National Kidney Disease Education Program (NKDEP), eGFR is calculated by the ‘‘four-variable MDRD Study equation’’ from the serum creatinine concentration and the other three variables: age, gender, race ([2], for review see [3]). A GFR of v60 mL/min per 1.73 m is considered to be highly indicative of impaired kidney function. However, on switching from the Roche/Hitachi Jaffe to the ID-MS traceable methods Creatinine enzymatic or Creatinine Jaffe compensated, the GFR calculated with the original MDRD Study equation increased considerably, i.e. from 58 to 65 mL/(min61.73 m) for an 18-year-old Caucasian female with a Creatinine concentration of 102 mmol/L (1.15 mg/dL) as determined with an ID-MS traceable method (Figure 4). The problem of a shift in GFR values upon switching to an ID-MS traceable Creatinine method was recognized and the so-called ‘‘re-expressed 4variable MDRD Study equation’’ was developed [4] and is presently recommended for use with ID-MS traceable Creatinine methods by the NKDEP. The re-expressed formula is based on a re-assay of the MDRD Study samples with the same kinetic alkaline picrate method but calibrated to the ID-MS traceable Roche/Hitachi Creatinine Plus enzymatic assay [4]. The re-expressed equation gives GFR values slightly lower than the old formula (e.g. 61 mL/ (min61.73 m) versus 65 mL/(min61.73 m) in the a.m. example), but still significantly higher than those that had been obtained before with the Creatinine Jaffe values (Figure 4). For many customers it is still hard to accept that, according to ID-MS traceable CREA results and to the re-expressed MDRD formula, a result of ‘‘GFR w60 mL/(min61.73 m)’’ has to be reported for a sample that would have been ‘‘eGFR558 mL/ (min61.73 m)’’ with the classical Jaffe method. In summary, despite the undeniable benefits of having a standardized method, the pain of the transition is fading only slowly today, 10 years later.","PeriodicalId":76518,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum","volume":"241 ","pages":"64-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00365510802149937","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365510802149937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In 1997, Roche Diagnostics introduced an enzymatic creatinine test based on the enzymatic conversion of creatinine via creatine to sarcosine and on the quantification of sarcosine by a Trinder method involving sarcosine oxidase, peroxidase and aminoantipyrine. This method is a priori free of the well-known unspecific reactions of the classical ‘‘Creatinine Jaffe’’ method. Owing to the use of established techniques, it does not give a colour reaction with endogenous creatine and shows little or no interference from substances known to interfere with the Trinder reaction. As a consequence, a method comparison performed with 95 human sera gave a very good correlation with negligible intercept to the reference method isotope-dilution mass spectrometry (ID-MS; Figure 1). A comparable correlation could not be obtained in the past with the Roche/Hitachi Jaffe method (Figure 2). The discrepancy between the Jaffe and the ID-MS creatinine results is caused by the reaction of the alkaline picrate reagent with a variety of endogenous sample components in addition to that with creatinine. This results in an intercept in the method comparison that cannot be corrected by routine calibration procedures. However, the difference is fairly constant at approximately 26 mmol/L (0.3 mg/ dL) for serum or plasma samples over the entire measuring range. This finding led Roche Diagnostics to introduce the ‘‘Creatinine Jaffe compensated’’ method that automatically corrects each result by 224 mmol/L (20.27 mg/dL). Using this compensation in combination with a new standardization, an acceptable correlation with the reference method results is obtained with the Roche/Hitachi Jaffe method as well (Figure 3). While, with implementation of the Jaffe compensated method, the Creatinine routine methods showed satisfactory agreement with and the desired traceability to the reference method ID-MS, a new problem arose with estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Estimation of GFR is used in screening for chronic kidney disease. According to the recommendations of the National Kidney Disease Education Program (NKDEP), eGFR is calculated by the ‘‘four-variable MDRD Study equation’’ from the serum creatinine concentration and the other three variables: age, gender, race ([2], for review see [3]). A GFR of v60 mL/min per 1.73 m is considered to be highly indicative of impaired kidney function. However, on switching from the Roche/Hitachi Jaffe to the ID-MS traceable methods Creatinine enzymatic or Creatinine Jaffe compensated, the GFR calculated with the original MDRD Study equation increased considerably, i.e. from 58 to 65 mL/(min61.73 m) for an 18-year-old Caucasian female with a Creatinine concentration of 102 mmol/L (1.15 mg/dL) as determined with an ID-MS traceable method (Figure 4). The problem of a shift in GFR values upon switching to an ID-MS traceable Creatinine method was recognized and the so-called ‘‘re-expressed 4variable MDRD Study equation’’ was developed [4] and is presently recommended for use with ID-MS traceable Creatinine methods by the NKDEP. The re-expressed formula is based on a re-assay of the MDRD Study samples with the same kinetic alkaline picrate method but calibrated to the ID-MS traceable Roche/Hitachi Creatinine Plus enzymatic assay [4]. The re-expressed equation gives GFR values slightly lower than the old formula (e.g. 61 mL/ (min61.73 m) versus 65 mL/(min61.73 m) in the a.m. example), but still significantly higher than those that had been obtained before with the Creatinine Jaffe values (Figure 4). For many customers it is still hard to accept that, according to ID-MS traceable CREA results and to the re-expressed MDRD formula, a result of ‘‘GFR w60 mL/(min61.73 m)’’ has to be reported for a sample that would have been ‘‘eGFR558 mL/ (min61.73 m)’’ with the classical Jaffe method. In summary, despite the undeniable benefits of having a standardized method, the pain of the transition is fading only slowly today, 10 years later.
如何实现肌酐结果的可追溯性:一个制造商的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信