The Nordic maintenance care program--case management of chiropractic patients with low back pain: a survey of Swedish chiropractors.

Iben Axén, Annika Rosenbaum, Andreas Eklund, Laszlo Halasz, Kristian Jørgensen, Peter W Lövgren, Fredrik Lange, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
{"title":"The Nordic maintenance care program--case management of chiropractic patients with low back pain: a survey of Swedish chiropractors.","authors":"Iben Axén,&nbsp;Annika Rosenbaum,&nbsp;Andreas Eklund,&nbsp;Laszlo Halasz,&nbsp;Kristian Jørgensen,&nbsp;Peter W Lövgren,&nbsp;Fredrik Lange,&nbsp;Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde","doi":"10.1186/1746-1340-16-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chiropractic treatment for low back pain (LBP) can often be divided into two phases: Initial treatment of the problem to attempt to remove pain and bring it back into its pre-clinical or maximum improvement status, and \"maintenance care\", during which it is attempted to maintain this status. Although the use of chiropractic maintenance care has been described and discussed in the literature, there is no information as to its precise indications. The objective of this study is to investigate if there is agreement among Swedish chiropractors on the overall patient management for various types of LBP-scenarios, with a special emphasis on maintenance care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The design was a mailed questionnaire survey. Members of the Swedish Chiropractors' Association, who were participants in previous practice-based research, were sent a closed-end questionnaire consisting of nine case scenarios and six clinical management alternatives and the possibility to create one's own alternative, resulting in a \"nine-by-seven\" table. The research team defined its own pre hoc choice of \"clinically logical\" answers based on the team's clinical experience. The frequency of findings was compared to the suggestions of the research team.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Replies were received from 59 (60%) of the 99 persons who were invited to take part in the study. A pattern of self-reported clinical management strategies emerged, largely corresponding to the \"clinically logical\" answers suggested by the research team. In general, patients of concern would be referred out for a second opinion, cases with early recovery and without a history of previous low back pain would be quickly closed, and cases with quick recovery and a history of recurring events would be considered for maintenance care. However, also other management patterns were noted, in particular in the direction of maintenance care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To a reasonable extent, Swedish chiropractors participating in this survey appear to agree on the clinical management for different cases of LBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":87173,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","volume":"16 ","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1746-1340-16-6","citationCount":"56","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-16-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

Abstract

Background: Chiropractic treatment for low back pain (LBP) can often be divided into two phases: Initial treatment of the problem to attempt to remove pain and bring it back into its pre-clinical or maximum improvement status, and "maintenance care", during which it is attempted to maintain this status. Although the use of chiropractic maintenance care has been described and discussed in the literature, there is no information as to its precise indications. The objective of this study is to investigate if there is agreement among Swedish chiropractors on the overall patient management for various types of LBP-scenarios, with a special emphasis on maintenance care.

Method: The design was a mailed questionnaire survey. Members of the Swedish Chiropractors' Association, who were participants in previous practice-based research, were sent a closed-end questionnaire consisting of nine case scenarios and six clinical management alternatives and the possibility to create one's own alternative, resulting in a "nine-by-seven" table. The research team defined its own pre hoc choice of "clinically logical" answers based on the team's clinical experience. The frequency of findings was compared to the suggestions of the research team.

Results: Replies were received from 59 (60%) of the 99 persons who were invited to take part in the study. A pattern of self-reported clinical management strategies emerged, largely corresponding to the "clinically logical" answers suggested by the research team. In general, patients of concern would be referred out for a second opinion, cases with early recovery and without a history of previous low back pain would be quickly closed, and cases with quick recovery and a history of recurring events would be considered for maintenance care. However, also other management patterns were noted, in particular in the direction of maintenance care.

Conclusion: To a reasonable extent, Swedish chiropractors participating in this survey appear to agree on the clinical management for different cases of LBP.

北欧维持护理计划-脊椎指压治疗患者腰痛的病例管理:对瑞典脊椎指压治疗者的调查。
背景:脊椎指压疗法治疗腰痛通常可分为两个阶段:对问题进行初始治疗,试图消除疼痛并使其恢复到临床前或最大程度的改善状态;以及“维持护理”,在此期间试图维持这种状态。虽然在文献中描述和讨论了捏脊维持护理的使用,但没有关于其确切适应症的信息。本研究的目的是调查瑞典的脊医是否对各种类型的lbp情况的整体患者管理达成一致,特别强调维持护理。方法:采用邮寄问卷调查法。瑞典脊椎按摩师协会(Swedish Chiropractors’Association)的成员曾参与过以往的以实践为基础的研究,他们收到了一份封闭式问卷,其中包括9个案例场景和6种临床管理方案,以及创建自己的替代方案的可能性,结果形成了一张“9 * 7”表格。研究团队根据团队的临床经验定义了自己预先选择的“临床逻辑”答案。结果的频率与研究小组的建议进行了比较。结果:被邀请参加研究的99人中,收到了59人(60%)的回复。一种自我报告的临床管理策略模式出现了,很大程度上与研究小组提出的“临床逻辑”答案相对应。一般情况下,值得关注的患者将被转介到医院寻求第二意见,恢复早期且没有腰痛病史的患者将被迅速关闭,而恢复迅速且有复发病史的患者将被考虑进行维持护理。但是,也注意到其他管理模式,特别是在维修方面。结论:参与本次调查的瑞典脊医对不同腰痛病例的临床处理似乎在一定程度上达成一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信