Joanne Glinsky , Lisa Harvey , Monique Korten , Craig Drury , Shane Chee , Simon C. Gandevia
{"title":"Short-term progressive resistance exercise may not be effective at increasing wrist strength in people with tetraplegia: a randomised controlled trial","authors":"Joanne Glinsky , Lisa Harvey , Monique Korten , Craig Drury , Shane Chee , Simon C. Gandevia","doi":"10.1016/S0004-9514(08)70043-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Questions</h3><p>Is an 8-week progressive resistance exercise program effective for increasing strength in the wrist muscles of people with tetraplegia? Is it effective for improving muscle endurance and participants’ perceptions about use of their hands for activities of daily living?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding, and intentionto-treat analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Thirty-two people with tetraplegia and neurological weakness of their wrist flexor or extensor muscles.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>The wrist muscles of one randomly-chosen hand were trained 3 times a week for 8 weeks. The control group received no intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>The primary outcome was strength measured as maximal voluntary isometric torque in Nm. The secondary outcomes were muscle endurance measured as fatigue resistance and participants’ perceptions about use of their hands using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean effect on maximal voluntary isometric torque was 0.2 Nm (95% CI –0.5 to 0.8). This represents an 8% increase of mean initial strength; less than the 20% deemed clinically worthwhile at the commencement of the study. The mean effect on fatigue resistance was 0.1 (95% CI 0.0 to 0.2). The mean effect on participants’ perceptions of performance was –0.3 (95% CI –1.9 to 1.2) and satisfaction was –0.3 (95% CI –1.6 to 1.0).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results indicate that progressive resistance exercise has no effect on participants’ perceptions about hand function. However, it is not yet clear whether progressive resistance exercise programs improve strength and endurance in muscles with neurologically-induced weakness following tetraplegia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50086,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"54 2","pages":"Pages 103-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0004-9514(08)70043-6","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004951408700436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32
Abstract
Questions
Is an 8-week progressive resistance exercise program effective for increasing strength in the wrist muscles of people with tetraplegia? Is it effective for improving muscle endurance and participants’ perceptions about use of their hands for activities of daily living?
Design
Randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding, and intentionto-treat analysis.
Participants
Thirty-two people with tetraplegia and neurological weakness of their wrist flexor or extensor muscles.
Intervention
The wrist muscles of one randomly-chosen hand were trained 3 times a week for 8 weeks. The control group received no intervention.
Outcome measures
The primary outcome was strength measured as maximal voluntary isometric torque in Nm. The secondary outcomes were muscle endurance measured as fatigue resistance and participants’ perceptions about use of their hands using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure.
Results
The mean effect on maximal voluntary isometric torque was 0.2 Nm (95% CI –0.5 to 0.8). This represents an 8% increase of mean initial strength; less than the 20% deemed clinically worthwhile at the commencement of the study. The mean effect on fatigue resistance was 0.1 (95% CI 0.0 to 0.2). The mean effect on participants’ perceptions of performance was –0.3 (95% CI –1.9 to 1.2) and satisfaction was –0.3 (95% CI –1.6 to 1.0).
Conclusion
The results indicate that progressive resistance exercise has no effect on participants’ perceptions about hand function. However, it is not yet clear whether progressive resistance exercise programs improve strength and endurance in muscles with neurologically-induced weakness following tetraplegia.
8周渐进式阻力训练计划对四肢瘫痪患者增加手腕肌肉力量有效吗?它对提高肌肉耐力和参与者对日常生活活动中使用双手的认知有效吗?设计随机对照试验,采用隐蔽分配、评估盲法和意向治疗分析。参与者32名四肢瘫痪且手腕屈肌或伸肌神经无力的患者。干预:随机选择一只手,每周训练3次,持续8周。对照组不进行干预。主要终点是以Nm的最大自主等距扭矩测量的强度。次要结果是肌肉耐力测量疲劳阻力和参与者的感知使用他们的手使用加拿大职业绩效测量。结果对最大自主等距扭矩的平均影响为0.2 Nm (95% CI -0.5 ~ 0.8)。这表示平均初始强度增加了8%;少于20%的人在研究开始时认为有临床价值。对疲劳抗力的平均影响为0.1 (95% CI 0.0 ~ 0.2)。对参与者表现感知的平均影响为-0.3 (95% CI -1.9至1.2),满意度为-0.3 (95% CI -1.6至1.0)。结论渐进式阻力运动对被试手功能知觉无明显影响。然而,目前尚不清楚渐进式阻力运动项目是否能改善四肢瘫痪后神经系统引起的肌肉无力的力量和耐力。