Hydrotherapy and Tai Chi each provide clinical improvements for older people with osteoarthritis

Shylie Mackintosh
{"title":"Hydrotherapy and Tai Chi each provide clinical improvements for older people with osteoarthritis","authors":"Shylie Mackintosh","doi":"10.1016/S0004-9514(08)70050-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>For people with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee, do hydrotherapy or Tai Chi give worthwhile improvements in pain and physical function?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomised, 3-arm, parallel, controlled trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding, and intention-to-treat analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Tertiary hospital, Sydney, Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Adults aged 59–85 years, with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee meeting American College of Rheumatology criteria, recruited through advertisements, social clubs for older people, and referral from local general practitioners and rheumatologists. 55 participants were randomised to hydrotherapy, 56 to Tai Chi, and 41 to a control group.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Participants in either of the two treatments groups were required to attend classes (max 15 participants) for one hour, twice per week for 12 weeks. Hydrotherapy involved lower limb exercise in waist-deep water, including walking, free-standing and bar work, running, and stairs. Tai Chi included a 10-minute warm-up followed by a modification of 24 forms of Sun style Tai Chi. Participants were allowed to purchase, if they desired, a Tai Chi video to assist with home practice. The control group were waitlisted for 12 weeks and then randomly allocated to one of the two treatments.</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes</h3><p>The primary outcomes were pain and physical function measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Secondary outcomes included the SF-12 general health status questionnaire; the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale of psychological well being; the participant's global assessment of treatment effectiveness and current status of the joint that had originally been the most painful; and physical performance measures (50-foot walk test, stair climb test, and Up and Go test). Outcomes were assessed at the end of the 12-week treatment period, and 12 weeks later.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At the end of treatment, pain had improved by 6 points (95% CI 0 to 13) more in the hydrotherapy group than the control group. Similarly, physical function had improved by 10 points (95% CI 4 to 14) more in the hydrotherapy group and by 10 points (95%CI 3 to 17) more in the Tai Chi group. The hydrotherapy group also showed significant treatment benefits in the physical component summary of the SF-12 and the three physical performance measures. Twelve weeks later, comparisons with a no-treatment control group were not possible, but the outcomes that had improved significantly during treatment had mostly been maintained.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Older people with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee can obtain clinically worthwhile improvements in physical function from hydrotherapy or Tai Chi.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50086,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"54 2","pages":"Page 143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0004-9514(08)70050-3","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004951408700503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Question

For people with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee, do hydrotherapy or Tai Chi give worthwhile improvements in pain and physical function?

Design

Randomised, 3-arm, parallel, controlled trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding, and intention-to-treat analysis.

Setting

Tertiary hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Participants

Adults aged 59–85 years, with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee meeting American College of Rheumatology criteria, recruited through advertisements, social clubs for older people, and referral from local general practitioners and rheumatologists. 55 participants were randomised to hydrotherapy, 56 to Tai Chi, and 41 to a control group.

Interventions

Participants in either of the two treatments groups were required to attend classes (max 15 participants) for one hour, twice per week for 12 weeks. Hydrotherapy involved lower limb exercise in waist-deep water, including walking, free-standing and bar work, running, and stairs. Tai Chi included a 10-minute warm-up followed by a modification of 24 forms of Sun style Tai Chi. Participants were allowed to purchase, if they desired, a Tai Chi video to assist with home practice. The control group were waitlisted for 12 weeks and then randomly allocated to one of the two treatments.

Outcomes

The primary outcomes were pain and physical function measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Secondary outcomes included the SF-12 general health status questionnaire; the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale of psychological well being; the participant's global assessment of treatment effectiveness and current status of the joint that had originally been the most painful; and physical performance measures (50-foot walk test, stair climb test, and Up and Go test). Outcomes were assessed at the end of the 12-week treatment period, and 12 weeks later.

Results

At the end of treatment, pain had improved by 6 points (95% CI 0 to 13) more in the hydrotherapy group than the control group. Similarly, physical function had improved by 10 points (95% CI 4 to 14) more in the hydrotherapy group and by 10 points (95%CI 3 to 17) more in the Tai Chi group. The hydrotherapy group also showed significant treatment benefits in the physical component summary of the SF-12 and the three physical performance measures. Twelve weeks later, comparisons with a no-treatment control group were not possible, but the outcomes that had improved significantly during treatment had mostly been maintained.

Conclusion

Older people with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee can obtain clinically worthwhile improvements in physical function from hydrotherapy or Tai Chi.

水疗和太极都能改善老年骨关节炎患者的临床症状
对于患有髋关节或膝关节骨关节炎的人来说,水疗或太极能有效改善疼痛和身体机能吗?设计随机、三臂、平行、对照试验,采用隐蔽分配、评估者盲法和意向治疗分析。第三医院,悉尼,澳大利亚。参与者年龄在59-85岁之间,患有髋关节或膝关节骨关节炎,符合美国风湿病学会的标准,通过广告、老年人社交俱乐部和当地全科医生和风湿病学家的推荐招募。55名参与者被随机分配到水疗组,56人被分配到太极拳组,41人被分配到对照组。干预措施两个治疗组的参与者都被要求参加课程(最多15人),每周两次,每次一小时,持续12周。水疗法包括在齐腰深的水中进行下肢运动,包括散步、独立行走、酒吧工作、跑步和爬楼梯。太极拳包括10分钟的热身,然后是24种太阳式太极拳的修改。参与者可以购买,如果他们愿意,太极视频,以协助家庭练习。对照组等待12周,然后随机分配到两种治疗中的一种。主要结果是疼痛和身体功能,由安大略省西部和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)测量。次要结局包括SF-12一般健康状况问卷;心理健康抑郁、焦虑、压力量表;参与者对治疗效果和最初最疼痛关节现状的总体评估;以及体能测试(50英尺步行测试、爬楼梯测试和Up and Go测试)。在12周治疗期结束和12周后评估结果。结果治疗结束时,水疗法组疼痛改善程度较对照组高6点(95% CI 0 ~ 13)。同样,水疗组的身体机能改善了10个点(95%CI 4至14),太极拳组的身体机能改善了10个点(95%CI 3至17)。在SF-12的物理成分总结和三项物理性能测量中,水疗组也显示出显著的治疗益处。12周后,无法与未治疗对照组进行比较,但治疗期间显著改善的结果大部分得到了维持。结论老年髋关节或膝关节骨性关节炎患者通过水疗或太极治疗可获得临床有价值的身体功能改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信