S Kummel, H Heidecke, B Brock, C Denkert, J Hecktor, A Koninger, I Becker, J Sehouli, A Thomas, J U Blohmer, W Lichtenegger, R Kimmig
{"title":"[Imatinib--a possible therapeutic option for cervical carcinoma: results of a preclinical phase I study].","authors":"S Kummel, H Heidecke, B Brock, C Denkert, J Hecktor, A Koninger, I Becker, J Sehouli, A Thomas, J U Blohmer, W Lichtenegger, R Kimmig","doi":"10.1159/000119032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the last few years, the therapy of cervical carcinoma has progressed substantially due to the use of simultaneous platinum- containing radiochemotherapy. However, there are no data which evaluate an individualized treatment adapted to tumor biology, in spite of the fact that patients show remarkably different responses to chemotherapy. Therefore this preclinical phase I study aims at finding therapeutic alternatives to the current cytostatic drugs to treat cervical carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In a tumor chemosensitivity assay, 8 drugs were tested on freshly isolated tumor cells of 16 patients [carbo- and cisplatin, topotecan, paclitaxel as well as the 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib (Glivec) and gefitinib (Iressa (R) ) and the 2 monoclonal antibodies cetuximab (Erbitux) and trastuzumab (Herceptin (R) )].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall the test was evaluable for 16 specimens (100%). Ten of 15 tumor samples (66.6%) were sensitive to imatinib. A sensitive therapeutic response could be demonstrated in all tested FIGO stages. An interindividual comparison could establish sensitivity to cetuximab in 12.5% of cases, to gefitinib in 6.25%, to trastuzumab in 6.6%, to cisplatin in 13.3%, to carboplatin in 7.6%, to paclitaxel in 93.8% and to topotecan in 25%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Imatinib seems to be an efficacious therapeutic option for patients with cervical carcinoma, independently of tumor subtype.</p>","PeriodicalId":12827,"journal":{"name":"Gynakologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau","volume":"48 2","pages":"94-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000119032","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynakologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000119032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
Background: In the last few years, the therapy of cervical carcinoma has progressed substantially due to the use of simultaneous platinum- containing radiochemotherapy. However, there are no data which evaluate an individualized treatment adapted to tumor biology, in spite of the fact that patients show remarkably different responses to chemotherapy. Therefore this preclinical phase I study aims at finding therapeutic alternatives to the current cytostatic drugs to treat cervical carcinoma.
Material and methods: In a tumor chemosensitivity assay, 8 drugs were tested on freshly isolated tumor cells of 16 patients [carbo- and cisplatin, topotecan, paclitaxel as well as the 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib (Glivec) and gefitinib (Iressa (R) ) and the 2 monoclonal antibodies cetuximab (Erbitux) and trastuzumab (Herceptin (R) )].
Results: Overall the test was evaluable for 16 specimens (100%). Ten of 15 tumor samples (66.6%) were sensitive to imatinib. A sensitive therapeutic response could be demonstrated in all tested FIGO stages. An interindividual comparison could establish sensitivity to cetuximab in 12.5% of cases, to gefitinib in 6.25%, to trastuzumab in 6.6%, to cisplatin in 13.3%, to carboplatin in 7.6%, to paclitaxel in 93.8% and to topotecan in 25%.
Conclusion: Imatinib seems to be an efficacious therapeutic option for patients with cervical carcinoma, independently of tumor subtype.