Factors associated with African Americans' enrollment in a national cancer genetics registry.

Community genetics Pub Date : 2008-01-01 Epub Date: 2008-04-14 DOI:10.1159/000116883
C S Skinner, J M Schildkraut, B Calingaert, C Hoyo, S S Crankshaw, L Fish, L Susswein, C Jasper, L Reid
{"title":"Factors associated with African Americans' enrollment in a national cancer genetics registry.","authors":"C S Skinner,&nbsp;J M Schildkraut,&nbsp;B Calingaert,&nbsp;C Hoyo,&nbsp;S S Crankshaw,&nbsp;L Fish,&nbsp;L Susswein,&nbsp;C Jasper,&nbsp;L Reid","doi":"10.1159/000116883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explored whether reactions to the Cancer Genetics Network (CGN) or CGN enrollment differed by receipt of a standard informational brochure versus a targeted version addressing factors previously associated with African Americans' health behavior decisions and research participation. The 262 participants, identified through tumor registries or clinic contacts, were mailed brochures and completed phone interviews. When asked whether - based on the brochure - they were or were not 'leaning toward' CGN enrollment, about 75% of both standard and targeted groups reported leaning toward. When given the opportunity at the end of the interview, 68% enrolled in the CGN. Trust was strongly related to enrollment. Less education, less satisfaction with cancer care, and individualistic rather than collective orientation were associated with lower trust. Education was also bivariately associated with enrollment, but mediation analysis indicated that the operational mechanism of education's influence on enrollment was through trust.</p>","PeriodicalId":80975,"journal":{"name":"Community genetics","volume":"11 4","pages":"224-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000116883","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000116883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

This study explored whether reactions to the Cancer Genetics Network (CGN) or CGN enrollment differed by receipt of a standard informational brochure versus a targeted version addressing factors previously associated with African Americans' health behavior decisions and research participation. The 262 participants, identified through tumor registries or clinic contacts, were mailed brochures and completed phone interviews. When asked whether - based on the brochure - they were or were not 'leaning toward' CGN enrollment, about 75% of both standard and targeted groups reported leaning toward. When given the opportunity at the end of the interview, 68% enrolled in the CGN. Trust was strongly related to enrollment. Less education, less satisfaction with cancer care, and individualistic rather than collective orientation were associated with lower trust. Education was also bivariately associated with enrollment, but mediation analysis indicated that the operational mechanism of education's influence on enrollment was through trust.

非裔美国人在国家癌症遗传登记处登记的相关因素。
本研究探讨了对癌症遗传学网络(CGN)或CGN注册的反应是否因收到标准信息手册与针对先前与非裔美国人健康行为决策和研究参与相关因素的目标版本而有所不同。通过肿瘤登记或诊所联系确定的262名参与者被邮寄小册子并完成电话访谈。当被问及是否(根据宣传册)“倾向于”中广核招生时,大约75%的标准群体和目标群体都表示倾向于中广核。当面试结束时给予机会时,68%的人进入了CGN。信任与入学率密切相关。受教育程度较低、对癌症治疗的满意度较低、个人主义取向而非集体取向与信任度较低有关。教育对入学率也存在双变量影响,但中介分析表明教育对入学率影响的运行机制是通过信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信