Evaluation of on-arrival versus prompted metaphylaxis regimes using ceftiofur crystalline free acid for feedlot heifers at risk of developing bovine respiratory disease.

Veterinary Therapeutics Pub Date : 2008-01-01
John C Johnson, W Lawrence Bryson, Sam Barringer, Breck D Hunsaker
{"title":"Evaluation of on-arrival versus prompted metaphylaxis regimes using ceftiofur crystalline free acid for feedlot heifers at risk of developing bovine respiratory disease.","authors":"John C Johnson,&nbsp;W Lawrence Bryson,&nbsp;Sam Barringer,&nbsp;Breck D Hunsaker","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was designed to compare morbidity and mortality due to bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in 1,400 ranch-fresh, northern US calves that received either no metaphylaxis (MTX) (Group 1), MTX prompted by pen morbidity (Group 2), MTX prompted by a decline in feed intake (Group 3), or on-arrival MTX (Group 4). Ceftiofur crystalline free acid (6.6 mg/kg) was the MTX antimicrobial used. Decreased feed intake did not meet the study threshold, so Groups 1 and 3 were combined into a single control group. The percentage of calves not treated for BRD was 14% to 15% higher in Groups 4 and 2 (72.7% and 73.4%, respectively) compared with the controls (58.2%; P ≤ .02). Mortality was numerically higher in Group 2 (3.4%) compared with Groups 4 and 1 (0.9% and 1.6%, respectively). There were no differences in average daily gain or feed consumption. In northern, ranch-fresh calves, MTX as a health management practice reduces the incidence of BRD and has better utility when performed on arrival versus relying on morbidity as a signal for antimicrobial administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":51211,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Therapeutics","volume":"9 1","pages":"53-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was designed to compare morbidity and mortality due to bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in 1,400 ranch-fresh, northern US calves that received either no metaphylaxis (MTX) (Group 1), MTX prompted by pen morbidity (Group 2), MTX prompted by a decline in feed intake (Group 3), or on-arrival MTX (Group 4). Ceftiofur crystalline free acid (6.6 mg/kg) was the MTX antimicrobial used. Decreased feed intake did not meet the study threshold, so Groups 1 and 3 were combined into a single control group. The percentage of calves not treated for BRD was 14% to 15% higher in Groups 4 and 2 (72.7% and 73.4%, respectively) compared with the controls (58.2%; P ≤ .02). Mortality was numerically higher in Group 2 (3.4%) compared with Groups 4 and 1 (0.9% and 1.6%, respectively). There were no differences in average daily gain or feed consumption. In northern, ranch-fresh calves, MTX as a health management practice reduces the incidence of BRD and has better utility when performed on arrival versus relying on morbidity as a signal for antimicrobial administration.

对有患牛呼吸道疾病风险的饲养场小母牛使用头孢替弗晶体游离酸进行初到与提示过敏反应方案的评估。
本研究旨在比较1400头美国北部牧场新鲜小牛因牛呼吸道疾病(BRD)引起的发病率和死亡率,这些小牛分别接受了无过敏反应(MTX)(第1组)、畜栏疾病引起的MTX(第2组)、采食量减少引起的MTX(第3组)或到达时的MTX(第4组)。使用的MTX抗菌药物是头孢替福晶体游离酸(6.6 mg/kg)。减少的采食量未达到研究阈值,因此将第1组和第3组合并为单一对照组。第4组和第2组未进行BRD治疗的犊牛比例(分别为72.7%和73.4%)比对照组(58.2%;P≤0.02)。第2组死亡率(3.4%)高于第4组和第1组(分别为0.9%和1.6%)。两组平均日增重和采食量无显著差异。在北部牧场的新鲜犊牛中,MTX作为一种健康管理做法可降低BRD的发病率,在犊牛到达时进行MTX治疗比将发病率作为抗菌素使用的信号效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信