[Representations of illness in letters addressed to Samuel Hahnemann: gender and historical perspectives].

Bettina Brockmeyer
{"title":"[Representations of illness in letters addressed to Samuel Hahnemann: gender and historical perspectives].","authors":"Bettina Brockmeyer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reading letters depicting perceptions of the body, such as those addressed to the founder of homeopathy, Samuel Hahnemann in the 1830's, is one means to identify how gender influenced the self. Homeopathy produced specific writing situations for the patients. Taking into account the modern concept of privacy, this article demonstrates how patient's letters can express gender hierarchies, namely through different strategies used by patients in order to hide their own distress caused by illness. The expression and representation of experience and discourse are also analysed. In comparing women's and men's writings about their bodies, it is argued that women tend to disclose their knowledge whereas men typically offer names borrowed from different medical discourses in order to describe their illnesses. In short, women refer more often to experience and men to knowledge. One can therefore conclude that the way of representing body perceptions reflects a male or a female self, and suggests distinct constructions of the \"nature\" of male and female sexes of that time.</p>","PeriodicalId":81976,"journal":{"name":"Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte. Beiheft : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung","volume":"29 ","pages":"211-21, 259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte. Beiheft : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reading letters depicting perceptions of the body, such as those addressed to the founder of homeopathy, Samuel Hahnemann in the 1830's, is one means to identify how gender influenced the self. Homeopathy produced specific writing situations for the patients. Taking into account the modern concept of privacy, this article demonstrates how patient's letters can express gender hierarchies, namely through different strategies used by patients in order to hide their own distress caused by illness. The expression and representation of experience and discourse are also analysed. In comparing women's and men's writings about their bodies, it is argued that women tend to disclose their knowledge whereas men typically offer names borrowed from different medical discourses in order to describe their illnesses. In short, women refer more often to experience and men to knowledge. One can therefore conclude that the way of representing body perceptions reflects a male or a female self, and suggests distinct constructions of the "nature" of male and female sexes of that time.

[在给塞缪尔·哈内曼的信中疾病的表现:性别和历史观点]。
阅读描述对身体感知的信件,比如那些在19世纪30年代写给顺势疗法创始人塞缪尔·哈内曼(Samuel Hahnemann)的信件,是识别性别如何影响自我的一种手段。顺势疗法为患者创造了特定的写作情境。考虑到现代隐私的概念,本文展示了患者的信件如何表达性别等级,即通过患者使用不同的策略来隐藏自己因疾病引起的痛苦。对经验和话语的表达和表征也进行了分析。在比较女性和男性关于自己身体的文章时,人们认为女性倾向于透露自己的知识,而男性通常会提供从不同医学话语中借来的名字来描述自己的疾病。简而言之,女性更多地参考经验,而男性更多地参考知识。因此,我们可以得出这样的结论:表现身体感知的方式反映了男性或女性的自我,并暗示了当时男性和女性性别的“本质”的不同结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信