I. Fayolle-Minon, A. Condemine, V. Phaner, P. Calmels
{"title":"Médecine physique et de réadaptation et cancérologie : réflexion éthique à partir de cas cliniques","authors":"I. Fayolle-Minon, A. Condemine, V. Phaner, P. Calmels","doi":"10.1016/j.annrmp.2008.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Physical medicine and rehabilitation (PMR) can involve the care of cancer patients requiring rehabilitation for associated deficiencies. In this case, rehabilitation methods may differ due to the evolutive nature of the disease.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To reflect on this aspect of PMR based on real cases.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Cases study of patients hospitalised in the PMR unit for neurological rehabilitation and diagnosed with cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-four recorded cases (1998–2006); four cases are described because of difficult problems; in only seven cases the coexisting cancer had no impact on the rehabilitation process.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and Conclusion</h3><p>Supportive care for patients with a bad vital prognosis differs from standard rehabilitation and raises therapeutic and relational issues not commonly faced in PMR. Responses when confronted with a terminal disease are not the same as when confronted with a handicap. The role of the rehabilitation team is brought into question when functionality is of secondary importance. The response to physical pain is different in rehabilitation and often implies a behavioural approach, which requires the commitment of the patient to therapeutic programmes. We do not find this approach in oncology and the treatment of pain uses first some drugs. Supportive care of these patients requires a close working relationship with the oncology unit. Thus, a different approach must be taken to rehabilitation. It should always take into account the evolutive nature of cancer, which can undermine the patient's functions or setback the patient's recovery. It also requires the support of a care team, which is fully prepared for these setbacks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72206,"journal":{"name":"Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique","volume":"51 3","pages":"Pages 201-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.annrmp.2008.01.008","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168605408000081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Introduction
Physical medicine and rehabilitation (PMR) can involve the care of cancer patients requiring rehabilitation for associated deficiencies. In this case, rehabilitation methods may differ due to the evolutive nature of the disease.
Objective
To reflect on this aspect of PMR based on real cases.
Method
Cases study of patients hospitalised in the PMR unit for neurological rehabilitation and diagnosed with cancer.
Results
Twenty-four recorded cases (1998–2006); four cases are described because of difficult problems; in only seven cases the coexisting cancer had no impact on the rehabilitation process.
Discussion and Conclusion
Supportive care for patients with a bad vital prognosis differs from standard rehabilitation and raises therapeutic and relational issues not commonly faced in PMR. Responses when confronted with a terminal disease are not the same as when confronted with a handicap. The role of the rehabilitation team is brought into question when functionality is of secondary importance. The response to physical pain is different in rehabilitation and often implies a behavioural approach, which requires the commitment of the patient to therapeutic programmes. We do not find this approach in oncology and the treatment of pain uses first some drugs. Supportive care of these patients requires a close working relationship with the oncology unit. Thus, a different approach must be taken to rehabilitation. It should always take into account the evolutive nature of cancer, which can undermine the patient's functions or setback the patient's recovery. It also requires the support of a care team, which is fully prepared for these setbacks.