Incidence and severity of shoulder pain does not increase with the use of circuit class therapy during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a controlled trial

Coralie English , Susan Hillier , Kathy Stiller
{"title":"Incidence and severity of shoulder pain does not increase with the use of circuit class therapy during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a controlled trial","authors":"Coralie English ,&nbsp;Susan Hillier ,&nbsp;Kathy Stiller","doi":"10.1016/S0004-9514(08)70065-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Questions</h3><p>Does circuit class therapy result in a greater incidence or severity of shoulder pain compared with individual therapy? Is the incidence influenced by the degree of active shoulder control?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Controlled trial with intention-totreat analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Sixty-eight people (6 drop-outs) undergoing inpatient rehabilitation after stroke.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>Participants received either individual therapy or group circuit class therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>Incidence of shoulder pain over the previous 24 hours was measured as a yes/no response while severity of shoulder pain was measured using a visual analogue scale at admission, Week 4, and discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no greater chance of participants receiving circuit class therapy having shoulder pain at Week 4 (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.32 to 2.80) or discharge (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.45) than participants receiving individual therapy. Of those participants who reported pain, there was no difference between groups in the severity of pain at Week 4 (mean difference –0.2 cm, 95% CI –3.2 to 2.7) or discharge (mean difference –2.1 cm, 95% CI –4.8 to 0.6). There was a greater chance of participants who had no active shoulder control having shoulder pain at Week 4 (OR 5.8, 95% CI 1.6 to 20.4) and at discharge (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.0 to 13.9) than participants who had active shoulder control.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The incidence and severity of shoulder pain was influenced by degree of active shoulder control but not by type of physiotherapy service delivery. Concerns regarding shoulder pain should not be a barrier to the implementation of circuit class therapy during inpatient stroke rehabilitation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50086,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"54 1","pages":"Pages 41-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0004-9514(08)70065-5","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004951408700655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Questions

Does circuit class therapy result in a greater incidence or severity of shoulder pain compared with individual therapy? Is the incidence influenced by the degree of active shoulder control?

Design

Controlled trial with intention-totreat analysis.

Participants

Sixty-eight people (6 drop-outs) undergoing inpatient rehabilitation after stroke.

Intervention

Participants received either individual therapy or group circuit class therapy.

Outcome measures

Incidence of shoulder pain over the previous 24 hours was measured as a yes/no response while severity of shoulder pain was measured using a visual analogue scale at admission, Week 4, and discharge.

Results

There was no greater chance of participants receiving circuit class therapy having shoulder pain at Week 4 (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.32 to 2.80) or discharge (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.45) than participants receiving individual therapy. Of those participants who reported pain, there was no difference between groups in the severity of pain at Week 4 (mean difference –0.2 cm, 95% CI –3.2 to 2.7) or discharge (mean difference –2.1 cm, 95% CI –4.8 to 0.6). There was a greater chance of participants who had no active shoulder control having shoulder pain at Week 4 (OR 5.8, 95% CI 1.6 to 20.4) and at discharge (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.0 to 13.9) than participants who had active shoulder control.

Conclusion

The incidence and severity of shoulder pain was influenced by degree of active shoulder control but not by type of physiotherapy service delivery. Concerns regarding shoulder pain should not be a barrier to the implementation of circuit class therapy during inpatient stroke rehabilitation.

住院卒中康复期间,肩部疼痛的发生率和严重程度不会随着循环类疗法的使用而增加:一项对照试验
与单独治疗相比,循环类治疗是否导致肩痛的发生率或严重程度更高?发病率是否受肩部主动控制程度的影响?设计意向治疗分析对照试验。参与者脑卒中后住院康复的68人(6人退出)。干预:参与者接受个体治疗或团体巡回课堂治疗。结果测量:在入院、第4周和出院时,采用视觉模拟量表测量前24小时内肩痛的发生率,以是/否反应来测量,肩痛的严重程度。结果:与接受单独治疗的受试者相比,接受循环类治疗的受试者在第4周出现肩痛(OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.32 - 2.80)或出院(OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.11 - 1.45)的几率并不大。在那些报告疼痛的参与者中,两组在第4周的疼痛严重程度(平均差异-0.2 cm, 95% CI -3.2至2.7)或出院时(平均差异-2.1 cm, 95% CI -4.8至0.6)没有差异。没有主动肩部控制的参与者在第4周(OR 5.8, 95% CI 1.6至20.4)和出院时(OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.0至13.9)比主动肩部控制的参与者有更大的机会出现肩部疼痛。结论肩部疼痛的发生率和严重程度受肩部主动控制程度的影响,而不受物理治疗服务提供方式的影响。对肩部疼痛的担忧不应成为住院中风康复期间电路类治疗实施的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信