Clinical evaluation of four recombinant Treponema pallidum antigen-based rapid tests in the diagnosis of syphilis.

Lin-na Wang, Lei Yang, He-yi Zheng
{"title":"Clinical evaluation of four recombinant Treponema pallidum antigen-based rapid tests in the diagnosis of syphilis.","authors":"Lin-na Wang,&nbsp;Lei Yang,&nbsp;He-yi Zheng","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the sensitivity, specificity, and feasibility of 4 recombinant Treponema pallidum antigen-based rapid tests in the diagnosis of syphilis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 970 outpatients were selected from the Sexually Transmitted Diseases Centre of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Venous blood was collected and serum was extracted. T. pallidum antibodies in whole blood, anticoagulant whole blood, and serum were detected using 4 recombinant T. pallidum antigen-based rapid tests. T. pallidum haemagglutination test (TPHA) was considered as the gold standard for the detection of T. pallidum specific antibodies in serum. The sensitivities and specificities of four methods were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivities and specificities of Abbott Determine Syphilis TP test, SD-BIOLINE Syphilis 3.0 test, VISITECT-SYPHILIS test, and Syphicheck-WB test for serum specimens were 100% and 98.9%, 95.7% and 98.0%, 94.6% and 98.2%, 68.1% and 98.9%; for whole blood were 74.1% and 99.5%, 87.9% and 99.4%, 73.2% and 99.7%, 64.7% and 99.7%. The observed sensitivities of the 4 rapid diagnosis tests were not significantly different with TPHA (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 4 rapid tests show good performance and characteristics in the diagnosis of syphilis. Furthermore, they are more sensitive for serum specimens than whole blood.</p>","PeriodicalId":10186,"journal":{"name":"Chinese medical sciences journal = Chung-kuo i hsueh k'o hsueh tsa chih","volume":"22 4","pages":"250-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese medical sciences journal = Chung-kuo i hsueh k'o hsueh tsa chih","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the sensitivity, specificity, and feasibility of 4 recombinant Treponema pallidum antigen-based rapid tests in the diagnosis of syphilis.

Methods: A total of 970 outpatients were selected from the Sexually Transmitted Diseases Centre of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Venous blood was collected and serum was extracted. T. pallidum antibodies in whole blood, anticoagulant whole blood, and serum were detected using 4 recombinant T. pallidum antigen-based rapid tests. T. pallidum haemagglutination test (TPHA) was considered as the gold standard for the detection of T. pallidum specific antibodies in serum. The sensitivities and specificities of four methods were analyzed.

Results: The sensitivities and specificities of Abbott Determine Syphilis TP test, SD-BIOLINE Syphilis 3.0 test, VISITECT-SYPHILIS test, and Syphicheck-WB test for serum specimens were 100% and 98.9%, 95.7% and 98.0%, 94.6% and 98.2%, 68.1% and 98.9%; for whole blood were 74.1% and 99.5%, 87.9% and 99.4%, 73.2% and 99.7%, 64.7% and 99.7%. The observed sensitivities of the 4 rapid diagnosis tests were not significantly different with TPHA (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: The 4 rapid tests show good performance and characteristics in the diagnosis of syphilis. Furthermore, they are more sensitive for serum specimens than whole blood.

四种重组梅毒螺旋体抗原快速检测诊断梅毒的临床评价。
目的:评价4种重组梅毒螺旋体抗原快速检测诊断梅毒的敏感性、特异性和可行性。方法:选择北京协和医院性病中心门诊患者970例。采集静脉血,提取血清。采用4种基于重组苍白体抗原的快速检测方法检测全血、抗凝全血和血清中苍白体抗体。白僵菌血凝试验(TPHA)被认为是检测血清中白僵菌特异性抗体的金标准。分析了四种方法的敏感性和特异性。结果:Abbott确定梅毒TP试验、SD-BIOLINE梅毒3.0试验、visitect -梅毒试验、Syphicheck-WB试验对血清标本的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和98.9%、95.7%和98.0%、94.6%和98.2%、68.1%和98.9%;全血分别为74.1%和99.5%、87.9%和99.4%、73.2%和99.7%、64.7%和99.7%。4项快速诊断试验与TPHA的敏感性比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:4种快速检测方法在梅毒诊断中具有良好的性能和特点。此外,它们对血清标本比全血标本更敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信