The influence of spray properties on intranasal deposition.

Mow Yee Foo, Yung-Sung Cheng, Wei-Chung Su, Maureen D Donovan
{"title":"The influence of spray properties on intranasal deposition.","authors":"Mow Yee Foo,&nbsp;Yung-Sung Cheng,&nbsp;Wei-Chung Su,&nbsp;Maureen D Donovan","doi":"10.1089/jam.2007.0638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While numerous devices, formulations, and spray characteristics have been shown to influence nasal deposition efficiency, few studies have attempted to identify which of these interacting factors plays the greatest role in nasal spray deposition. The deposition patterns of solutions with a wide range of surface tensions and viscosities were measured using an MRI-derived nasal cavity replica. The resulting spray plumes had angles between 29 degrees and 80 degrees and contained droplet sizes (D(v50)) from 37-157 microm. Each formulation contained rhodamine 590 as a fluorescent marker for detection. Administration angles of 30 degrees , 40 degrees , or 50 degrees above horizontal were tested to investigate the role of user technique on nasal deposition. The amount of spray deposited within specific regions of the nasal cavity was determined by disassembling the replica and measuring the amount of rhodamine retained in each section. Most of the spray droplets were deposited onto the anterior region of the model, but sprays with small plume angles were capable of reaching the turbinate region with deposition efficiencies approaching 90%. Minimal dependence on droplet size, viscosity, or device was observed. Changes in inspiratory flow rate (0-60 L/min) had no significant effect on turbinate deposition efficiency. Both plume angle and administration angle were found to be important factors in determining deposition efficiency. For administration angles of 40 degrees or 50 degrees , maximal turbinate deposition efficiency (30-50%) occurred with plume angles of 55-65 degrees , whereas a 30 degrees administration angle gave an approximately 75% deposition efficiency for similar plume angles. Deposition efficiencies of approximately 90% could be achieved with plume angles <30 degrees using 30 degrees administration angles. Both the plume angle and administration angle are critical factors in determining deposition efficiency, while many other spray parameters, including particle size, have relatively minor influences on deposition within the nasal cavity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14878,"journal":{"name":"Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine","volume":"20 4","pages":"495-508"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/jam.2007.0638","citationCount":"102","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jam.2007.0638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 102

Abstract

While numerous devices, formulations, and spray characteristics have been shown to influence nasal deposition efficiency, few studies have attempted to identify which of these interacting factors plays the greatest role in nasal spray deposition. The deposition patterns of solutions with a wide range of surface tensions and viscosities were measured using an MRI-derived nasal cavity replica. The resulting spray plumes had angles between 29 degrees and 80 degrees and contained droplet sizes (D(v50)) from 37-157 microm. Each formulation contained rhodamine 590 as a fluorescent marker for detection. Administration angles of 30 degrees , 40 degrees , or 50 degrees above horizontal were tested to investigate the role of user technique on nasal deposition. The amount of spray deposited within specific regions of the nasal cavity was determined by disassembling the replica and measuring the amount of rhodamine retained in each section. Most of the spray droplets were deposited onto the anterior region of the model, but sprays with small plume angles were capable of reaching the turbinate region with deposition efficiencies approaching 90%. Minimal dependence on droplet size, viscosity, or device was observed. Changes in inspiratory flow rate (0-60 L/min) had no significant effect on turbinate deposition efficiency. Both plume angle and administration angle were found to be important factors in determining deposition efficiency. For administration angles of 40 degrees or 50 degrees , maximal turbinate deposition efficiency (30-50%) occurred with plume angles of 55-65 degrees , whereas a 30 degrees administration angle gave an approximately 75% deposition efficiency for similar plume angles. Deposition efficiencies of approximately 90% could be achieved with plume angles <30 degrees using 30 degrees administration angles. Both the plume angle and administration angle are critical factors in determining deposition efficiency, while many other spray parameters, including particle size, have relatively minor influences on deposition within the nasal cavity.

喷雾剂性质对鼻内沉积的影响。
虽然许多设备,配方和喷雾特性已被证明会影响鼻沉积效率,但很少有研究试图确定这些相互作用因素中哪一个在鼻喷雾沉积中起最大作用。使用mri衍生的鼻腔复制品测量了具有广泛表面张力和粘度的溶液的沉积模式。由此产生的喷雾羽流的角度在29度到80度之间,包含的液滴尺寸(D(v50))在37-157微米之间。每个配方都含有罗丹明590作为检测的荧光标记物。在水平以上30度、40度或50度的给药角度进行测试,以研究使用者技术对鼻沉积的作用。喷雾沉积在鼻腔的特定区域的量是通过拆卸复制品和测量罗丹明保留在每个部分的量来确定的。大部分喷雾液滴沉积在模型的前部区域,但小羽角的喷雾能够到达鼻甲区域,沉积效率接近90%。最小的依赖于液滴大小,粘度,或设备观察。吸气流量(0 ~ 60 L/min)的变化对鼻甲沉积效率无显著影响。发现羽流角和给药角是决定沉积效率的重要因素。当喷流角度为40度或50度时,喷流角度为55-65度时,甲骨沉积效率最高(30-50%),而喷流角度为30度时,甲骨沉积效率约为75%。在羽流角度下,沉积效率约为90%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信