The increasing problem of wound bacterial burden and infection in acute and chronic soft-tissue wounds caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Journal of burns and wounds Pub Date : 2007-11-16
Robert H Demling, Barbara Waterhouse
{"title":"The increasing problem of wound bacterial burden and infection in acute and chronic soft-tissue wounds caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.","authors":"Robert H Demling,&nbsp;Barbara Waterhouse","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become a leading cause of colonization and infection in both acute and chronic soft-tissue wounds.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective is to define this current epidemic problem caused by both community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) and hospital-acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA), focusing on the similarities and differences between these 2 isolates as well as the impact on wound management decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Methods used include a literature review on the growth of the current MRSA problem and its International scope. In addition, a current up-to-date assessment had been made of the problem and the current approach to management of MRSA in acute soft-tissue and chronic wounds. Burns are not discussed because this injury usually does not fit either categories and is managed quite uniquely.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results included the following: (1) There are very distinct properties of CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA, which must be considered for acute and chronic wound care. Management of both requires rigorous barrier precaution techniques to avoid cross-contamination. The presence of MRSA as a carrier state increases the risk of both a systemic and local wound infection in the carrier. There are large and increasing reservoirs of CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA worldwide leading to more bacteremias and wound problems. Topical antimicrobial therapy has not been addressed in managing MRSA in acute and chronic wounds.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conclusions include the fact that both HA-MRSA and CA-MRSA wound infections are rapidly increasing, especially with CA-MRSA. This high incidence requires appropriate wound prediction and management decisions as well as attempts to avoid further cross-contamination and reservoir growth. Topical antimicrobial therapy would seem to be an important component in controlling this tremendous problem. Yet this topic has yet to be adequately addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":87438,"journal":{"name":"Journal of burns and wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2104747/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of burns and wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlabelled: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become a leading cause of colonization and infection in both acute and chronic soft-tissue wounds.

Objective: Our objective is to define this current epidemic problem caused by both community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) and hospital-acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA), focusing on the similarities and differences between these 2 isolates as well as the impact on wound management decisions.

Methods: Methods used include a literature review on the growth of the current MRSA problem and its International scope. In addition, a current up-to-date assessment had been made of the problem and the current approach to management of MRSA in acute soft-tissue and chronic wounds. Burns are not discussed because this injury usually does not fit either categories and is managed quite uniquely.

Results: Results included the following: (1) There are very distinct properties of CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA, which must be considered for acute and chronic wound care. Management of both requires rigorous barrier precaution techniques to avoid cross-contamination. The presence of MRSA as a carrier state increases the risk of both a systemic and local wound infection in the carrier. There are large and increasing reservoirs of CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA worldwide leading to more bacteremias and wound problems. Topical antimicrobial therapy has not been addressed in managing MRSA in acute and chronic wounds.

Conclusion: Conclusions include the fact that both HA-MRSA and CA-MRSA wound infections are rapidly increasing, especially with CA-MRSA. This high incidence requires appropriate wound prediction and management decisions as well as attempts to avoid further cross-contamination and reservoir growth. Topical antimicrobial therapy would seem to be an important component in controlling this tremendous problem. Yet this topic has yet to be adequately addressed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的急慢性软组织伤口细菌负担和感染问题日益严重。
未标记:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)已成为急性和慢性软组织伤口定植和感染的主要原因。目的:我们的目标是定义目前由社区获得性MRSA(CA-MRSA)和医院获得性MRSA(HA-MRSA)引起的流行病问题,重点关注这两种分离株之间的相似性和差异,以及对伤口管理决策的影响。方法:使用的方法包括对当前MRSA问题的发展及其国际范围的文献综述。此外,对急性软组织和慢性伤口中MRSA的问题和当前管理方法进行了最新评估。烧伤没有被讨论,因为这种损伤通常不属于这两类,而且处理方式非常独特。结果:结果包括:(1)CA-MRSA和HA-MRSA具有非常明显的性质,在急慢性伤口护理中必须考虑这两种性质。两者的管理都需要严格的屏障预防技术,以避免交叉污染。MRSA作为携带者状态的存在增加了携带者全身和局部伤口感染的风险。全球范围内存在大量且不断增加的CA-MRSA和HA-MRSA,导致更多的菌血症和伤口问题。在急性和慢性伤口的MRSA管理中,局部抗菌治疗尚未得到解决。结论:结论包括HA-MRSA和CA-MRSA伤口感染都在迅速增加,尤其是CA-MRSA。这种高发病率需要适当的伤口预测和管理决策,并试图避免进一步的交叉污染和储层生长。局部抗菌治疗似乎是控制这一巨大问题的重要组成部分。然而,这一议题尚未得到充分解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信