Social mobilisation, drug coverage and compliance and adverse reactions in a Mass Drug Administration (MDA) Programme for the Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis in Sri Lanka.

Mirani V Weerasooriya, Channa T Yahathugoda, Darshana Wickramasinghe, Kithsiri N Gunawardena, Rohan A Dharmadasa, Kanchana K Vidanapathirana, Saman H Weerasekara, Wilfred A Samarawickrema
{"title":"Social mobilisation, drug coverage and compliance and adverse reactions in a Mass Drug Administration (MDA) Programme for the Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis in Sri Lanka.","authors":"Mirani V Weerasooriya,&nbsp;Channa T Yahathugoda,&nbsp;Darshana Wickramasinghe,&nbsp;Kithsiri N Gunawardena,&nbsp;Rohan A Dharmadasa,&nbsp;Kanchana K Vidanapathirana,&nbsp;Saman H Weerasekara,&nbsp;Wilfred A Samarawickrema","doi":"10.1186/1475-2883-6-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Sri Lanka filariasis is endemic in Southern, Western and North Western provinces covering eight districts designated as implementation units in the Programme for the Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis (PELF). Despite control activities over sixty years including multidose diethylcarbamazine, 6 mg/kg treatment microfilaria rates had persisted at low levels. Following systematic social mobilisation the first MDA with DEC albendazole combination was conducted in 2002.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated the extent social mobilisation had reached the people, their drug compliance and adverse reactions. Three localities were selected from each district to pick target population samples for pre-tested questionnaire. Three teams each with six people visited one district each day. One team worked from three starting points in one locality. A member applied eight part questionnaire to one family member totalling 150-160 people from one locality. Questions included social mobilisation, drug compliance and adverse reactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Information was disseminated by television, radio, banners and leaflets, to a lesser extent by people. Information reached more people in the periphery than in Colombo. 35.2% from Colombo municipality were unaware of the MDA. Drug coverage was 79.6%, home delivery 71.7% and delivery centres 7.9%. 35.6% in Colombo district and 53.4% from Colombo municipality did not receive drugs. Drugs were consumed by 71.4%. 28.6% who did not comply included 20.4% who did not receive them. 91.4% showed no adverse reactions, 7.5% were mild, 1.1% recovered with home remedies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Drug compliance showed significant positive correlation with awareness of the MDA. Door to door delivery was more successful than delivery from centres. More delivery centres conveniently located would have rectified this disparity. Poor awareness and compliance in Colombo and urban areas could be rectified with separate strategy for urban areas. More time for MDA and trained adequate manpower would ensure coverage to achieve elimination.</p>","PeriodicalId":84756,"journal":{"name":"Filaria journal","volume":"6 ","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1475-2883-6-11","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filaria journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2883-6-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

Background: In Sri Lanka filariasis is endemic in Southern, Western and North Western provinces covering eight districts designated as implementation units in the Programme for the Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis (PELF). Despite control activities over sixty years including multidose diethylcarbamazine, 6 mg/kg treatment microfilaria rates had persisted at low levels. Following systematic social mobilisation the first MDA with DEC albendazole combination was conducted in 2002.

Methods: We investigated the extent social mobilisation had reached the people, their drug compliance and adverse reactions. Three localities were selected from each district to pick target population samples for pre-tested questionnaire. Three teams each with six people visited one district each day. One team worked from three starting points in one locality. A member applied eight part questionnaire to one family member totalling 150-160 people from one locality. Questions included social mobilisation, drug compliance and adverse reactions.

Results: Information was disseminated by television, radio, banners and leaflets, to a lesser extent by people. Information reached more people in the periphery than in Colombo. 35.2% from Colombo municipality were unaware of the MDA. Drug coverage was 79.6%, home delivery 71.7% and delivery centres 7.9%. 35.6% in Colombo district and 53.4% from Colombo municipality did not receive drugs. Drugs were consumed by 71.4%. 28.6% who did not comply included 20.4% who did not receive them. 91.4% showed no adverse reactions, 7.5% were mild, 1.1% recovered with home remedies.

Conclusion: Drug compliance showed significant positive correlation with awareness of the MDA. Door to door delivery was more successful than delivery from centres. More delivery centres conveniently located would have rectified this disparity. Poor awareness and compliance in Colombo and urban areas could be rectified with separate strategy for urban areas. More time for MDA and trained adequate manpower would ensure coverage to achieve elimination.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

斯里兰卡消除淋巴丝虫病大规模药物管理规划的社会动员、药物覆盖、遵守情况和不良反应。
背景:在斯里兰卡,丝虫病在南部、西部和西北部省份流行,覆盖被指定为消除淋巴丝虫病规划执行单位的8个地区。尽管使用多剂量乙基卡马嗪进行了60多年的控制,但6 mg/kg处理的微丝虫率一直维持在低水平。在系统的社会动员之后,2002年开展了第一次丙二胺酮和阿苯达唑联合用药的大规模预防活动。方法:调查社会动员对人群的影响程度、用药依从性和不良反应情况。每区选取3个地区,抽取目标人群样本进行预测问卷。三个小组每组六人,每天访问一个地区。一个小组从一个地方的三个起点开始工作。一名成员对来自一个地区的一名家庭成员共150-160人进行了八部分问卷调查。问题包括社会动员、药物依从性和不良反应。结果:信息主要通过电视、广播、横幅、传单等方式传播,民众传播程度较低。与科伦坡相比,科伦坡周边地区获得的信息更多,35.2%的科伦坡人不知道MDA。药物覆盖率为79.6%,家中分娩覆盖率为71.7%,分娩中心覆盖率为7.9%。科伦坡区35.6%和科伦坡市53.4%的人没有得到药品。吸毒占71.4%。28.6%未遵守规定者,包括20.4%未收到通知者。91.4%无不良反应,7.5%为轻度,1.1%经家庭治疗后恢复。结论:药物依从性与MDA认知呈正相关。门到门的递送比中心递送更成功。如果有更多位置便利的配送中心,就可以纠正这种差距。科伦坡和城市地区认识和遵守情况不佳的问题可以通过城市地区的单独战略加以纠正。给MDA更多的时间和训练有素的充足人力将确保覆盖范围实现消除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信