[Bacteriological diagnosis with Petrifilm of mastitis pathogens in milk samples from each quarter and bulk milk samples].

V Krömker, T Hauptmann, A Bormann
{"title":"[Bacteriological diagnosis with Petrifilm of mastitis pathogens in milk samples from each quarter and bulk milk samples].","authors":"V Krömker,&nbsp;T Hauptmann,&nbsp;A Bormann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three experiments were conducted to evaluate four different Petrifllm products (3M, Neuss) for detection of mastitis pathogens in quarter and bulk milk samples, comparing them to the results of standard microbiological techniques. The aim of experiment 1 was to determine the sensitivity of 3M Rapid Coliform Count Plate in identifying clinical mastitis cases caused by coliform bacteria. Within 12 h of incubation, three times more coliform bacteria could be identified with Petrifilm than with the standard technique. For a valid result, milk samples must be free of contamination. Experiment 2 focused on whether Petrifilm was able to monitor S. aureus on bulk milk level in herds being infected with this pathogen. In relation to the gold standard (combination of both procedures (standard and Petrifilm, prevalence 52%), sensitivity for the standard procedure amounted to 15.4% and to 94% for Petrifilm. In Experiment 3 the combination of several Petrifilm (RUEGG, 2004) was compared with the standard diagnostic technique (gold standard). Sensitivity of the Petrifilm method approached the assumed gold standard to 43% and specificity to 29%. The positive predictive value of 28% showed that both procedures are not directly comparable with each other. Due to the definition of a gold standard, the weaknesses of the classical technique can be interpreted as a disadvantage of the Petrifilm procedure. The strength of the available Petrifilm as mastitis diagnostic tools is the identification of S. aureus and coliform microorganisms, moreover E. coli.</p>","PeriodicalId":49278,"journal":{"name":"Dtw. Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dtw. Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to evaluate four different Petrifllm products (3M, Neuss) for detection of mastitis pathogens in quarter and bulk milk samples, comparing them to the results of standard microbiological techniques. The aim of experiment 1 was to determine the sensitivity of 3M Rapid Coliform Count Plate in identifying clinical mastitis cases caused by coliform bacteria. Within 12 h of incubation, three times more coliform bacteria could be identified with Petrifilm than with the standard technique. For a valid result, milk samples must be free of contamination. Experiment 2 focused on whether Petrifilm was able to monitor S. aureus on bulk milk level in herds being infected with this pathogen. In relation to the gold standard (combination of both procedures (standard and Petrifilm, prevalence 52%), sensitivity for the standard procedure amounted to 15.4% and to 94% for Petrifilm. In Experiment 3 the combination of several Petrifilm (RUEGG, 2004) was compared with the standard diagnostic technique (gold standard). Sensitivity of the Petrifilm method approached the assumed gold standard to 43% and specificity to 29%. The positive predictive value of 28% showed that both procedures are not directly comparable with each other. Due to the definition of a gold standard, the weaknesses of the classical technique can be interpreted as a disadvantage of the Petrifilm procedure. The strength of the available Petrifilm as mastitis diagnostic tools is the identification of S. aureus and coliform microorganisms, moreover E. coli.

【各季度乳样及散装乳样乳腺炎病原菌的细菌学诊断】。
进行了三项实验,以评估四种不同的petriflm产品(3M, Neuss)在四分之一和散装牛奶样品中检测乳腺炎病原体的效果,并将其与标准微生物学技术的结果进行比较。实验1的目的是确定3M快速大肠菌群计数板对大肠菌群引起的临床乳腺炎病例的敏感性。在孵育12 h内,用Petrifilm技术鉴定出的大肠菌群是标准技术的3倍。为了得到有效的结果,牛奶样品必须没有污染。实验2的重点是Petrifilm是否能够监测金黄色葡萄球菌感染畜群的散装奶水平。相对于金标准(两个程序的组合(标准和Petrifilm,患病率为52%),标准程序的敏感性为15.4%,Petrifilm的敏感性为94%。实验3将几种Petrifilm (RUEGG, 2004)联合使用与标准诊断技术(金标准)进行比较。Petrifilm方法的灵敏度为43%,特异性为29%,接近假定金标准。阳性预测值为28%,表明两种方法之间没有直接可比性。由于黄金标准的定义,经典技术的弱点可以解释为Petrifilm程序的缺点。现有的石油膜作为乳腺炎诊断工具的优势在于鉴定金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠菌群微生物,以及大肠杆菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信