A QSPR Study on the GC Retention Times of a Series of Fatty, Dicarboxylic and Amino Acids by MLR and ANN

Ahmad Rouhollahi, Hooshang Shafieyan, Jahan Bakhsh Ghasemi
{"title":"A QSPR Study on the GC Retention Times of a Series of Fatty, Dicarboxylic and Amino Acids by MLR and ANN","authors":"Ahmad Rouhollahi,&nbsp;Hooshang Shafieyan,&nbsp;Jahan Bakhsh Ghasemi","doi":"10.1002/adic.200790077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR) analysis has been carried out to a series of fatty, amino and dicarboxylic acids to model their GC retention times. A genetic partial least square method (GAPLS) was applied as a variable selection tool. Modeling of retention times of these compounds as a function of the theoretically derived descriptors was established by multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural network (ANN). The neural network employed here is a connected back-propagation system with a 3-4-1 architecture. Three topological indices for these compounds, namely, mean information index on atomic composition (AAC), average connectivity index chi-0 (X0A) and total information index of atomic composition (IAC) taken as inputs for the regression models. The results indicate that the GA is a very effective variable selection approach for QSPR analysis. The comparison of the two regression methods used showed that ANN has better prediction ability than MLR. The statistical figure of merits of the two models showed the successful modeling of the retention times with molecular descriptors.</p>","PeriodicalId":8193,"journal":{"name":"Annali di chimica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/adic.200790077","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali di chimica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adic.200790077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR) analysis has been carried out to a series of fatty, amino and dicarboxylic acids to model their GC retention times. A genetic partial least square method (GAPLS) was applied as a variable selection tool. Modeling of retention times of these compounds as a function of the theoretically derived descriptors was established by multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural network (ANN). The neural network employed here is a connected back-propagation system with a 3-4-1 architecture. Three topological indices for these compounds, namely, mean information index on atomic composition (AAC), average connectivity index chi-0 (X0A) and total information index of atomic composition (IAC) taken as inputs for the regression models. The results indicate that the GA is a very effective variable selection approach for QSPR analysis. The comparison of the two regression methods used showed that ANN has better prediction ability than MLR. The statistical figure of merits of the two models showed the successful modeling of the retention times with molecular descriptors.

MLR和ANN对一系列脂肪酸、二羧酸和氨基酸GC保留时间的QSPR研究
对一系列脂肪酸、氨基酸和二羧酸进行了定量构效关系(QSPR)分析,以模拟它们的GC保留时间。采用遗传偏最小二乘法(GAPLS)作为变量选择工具。通过多元线性回归(MLR)和人工神经网络(ANN)建立了这些化合物的保留时间作为理论推导描述符的函数模型。这里使用的神经网络是一个3-4-1结构的连接反向传播系统。这些化合物的三个拓扑指数,即原子组成平均信息指数(AAC)、平均连通性指数chi-0 (X0A)和原子组成总信息指数(IAC)作为回归模型的输入。结果表明,遗传算法是一种非常有效的QSPR分析变量选择方法。两种回归方法的比较表明,人工神经网络的预测能力优于MLR。两种模型的优劣统计图表明,用分子描述符成功地建立了保留时间的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信