[The metabolic syndrome: marker of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients? The importance of definition].

P Marboeuf, M Gras, G Rosey, P Fontaine, C Mounier-Vehier
{"title":"[The metabolic syndrome: marker of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients? The importance of definition].","authors":"P Marboeuf,&nbsp;M Gras,&nbsp;G Rosey,&nbsp;P Fontaine,&nbsp;C Mounier-Vehier","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Metabolic syndrome (MetS) was defined by association of abdominal obesity, hypertension, glucose intolerance and/or dyslipidemia. The objective of this study was to compare the new International Diabetes Federation (IDF) definition and the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP) definition and their association with cardio-vascular disease in hypertensive patients.</p><p><strong>Population and method: </strong>Two hundred and thirty hypertensive patients were hospitalized successively for cardio-vascular disease exploration and hs-CRP measurement. The stratification of cardio-vascular risk was made according to the French recommendations. The IDF definition and the NCEP definition were compared according frequency of resistant hypertension and cardio-vascular disease extension.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our study, high cardio-vascular risk hypertension represented 68.5% of patients. Diabetes was present in 23.5% of them and obesity in 45.5%. Patients with cardio-vascular disease represented 60% of our study population. Prevalence of MetS was 38.5% according to the NCEP definition and 59% according to the IDF definition. The NCEP definition was allowed to select subjects with widespread vascular disease and resistant hypertension whereas the IDF definition did not. These results could be explained by lower waist circumference and glycaemia cuts offs according to the IDF criteria. When diabetic's patients were excluded, MetS was not associated with increase of resistant hypertension frequency. Moreover, hs-CRP was independently associated to the extension of the cardiovascular disease and smoking remained the most powerfully factor associated to the cardio-vascular disease extension.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In hypertensive patients, the NCEP definition seems more adapted to the diagnosis of MetS than the IDF one. Abdominal obesity could be the indispensable element to the MetS diagnosis but according to the NCEP waist circumference cut off. The use of this syndrome seems to be relevant to select the patients presenting an intermediate cardio-vascular risk in order to adapt treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":8144,"journal":{"name":"Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux","volume":"100 8","pages":"642-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) was defined by association of abdominal obesity, hypertension, glucose intolerance and/or dyslipidemia. The objective of this study was to compare the new International Diabetes Federation (IDF) definition and the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP) definition and their association with cardio-vascular disease in hypertensive patients.

Population and method: Two hundred and thirty hypertensive patients were hospitalized successively for cardio-vascular disease exploration and hs-CRP measurement. The stratification of cardio-vascular risk was made according to the French recommendations. The IDF definition and the NCEP definition were compared according frequency of resistant hypertension and cardio-vascular disease extension.

Results: In our study, high cardio-vascular risk hypertension represented 68.5% of patients. Diabetes was present in 23.5% of them and obesity in 45.5%. Patients with cardio-vascular disease represented 60% of our study population. Prevalence of MetS was 38.5% according to the NCEP definition and 59% according to the IDF definition. The NCEP definition was allowed to select subjects with widespread vascular disease and resistant hypertension whereas the IDF definition did not. These results could be explained by lower waist circumference and glycaemia cuts offs according to the IDF criteria. When diabetic's patients were excluded, MetS was not associated with increase of resistant hypertension frequency. Moreover, hs-CRP was independently associated to the extension of the cardiovascular disease and smoking remained the most powerfully factor associated to the cardio-vascular disease extension.

Conclusion: In hypertensive patients, the NCEP definition seems more adapted to the diagnosis of MetS than the IDF one. Abdominal obesity could be the indispensable element to the MetS diagnosis but according to the NCEP waist circumference cut off. The use of this syndrome seems to be relevant to select the patients presenting an intermediate cardio-vascular risk in order to adapt treatment.

代谢综合征:高血压患者心血管危险的标志?定义的重要性]。
代谢综合征(MetS)被定义为伴有腹部肥胖、高血压、葡萄糖耐受不良和/或血脂异常。本研究的目的是比较新的国际糖尿病联合会(IDF)定义和国家胆固醇教育计划成人治疗小组III (NCEP)定义及其与高血压患者心血管疾病的关系。人群与方法:连续住院的230例高血压患者进行心血管疾病探查和hs-CRP测定。心血管风险分层是根据法国的建议进行的。根据顽固性高血压和心血管疾病扩展的频次,比较IDF定义和NCEP定义。结果:在我们的研究中,高心血管危险高血压患者占68.5%。23.5%的人患有糖尿病,45.5%的人患有肥胖症。心血管疾病患者占我们研究人群的60%。根据NCEP的定义,met的患病率为38.5%,根据IDF的定义为59%。NCEP定义允许选择具有广泛血管疾病和顽固性高血压的受试者,而IDF定义则不允许。这些结果可以用较低的腰围和根据IDF标准的血糖切断来解释。当糖尿病患者被排除在外时,MetS与顽固性高血压频率的增加无关。此外,hs-CRP与心血管疾病的扩展独立相关,吸烟仍然是心血管疾病扩展的最重要因素。结论:在高血压患者中,NCEP的定义似乎比IDF的定义更适合于met的诊断。腹部肥胖可能是MetS诊断中不可缺少的因素,但根据NCEP腰围被切断。该综合征的使用似乎与选择出现中度心血管风险的患者有关,以便适应治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信