'Personal Care' and General Practice Medicine in the UK: A qualitative interview study with patients and General Practitioners.

Rachel Adam
{"title":"'Personal Care' and General Practice Medicine in the UK: A qualitative interview study with patients and General Practitioners.","authors":"Rachel Adam","doi":"10.1186/1750-4732-1-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent policy and organisational changes within UK primary care have emphasised graduated access to care, speed of access to the first available general practitioner (GP) and care being provided by a range of healthcare professionals. These trends have been strengthened by the current GP contract and Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). Concern has been expressed that the potential for personal care is being diminished as a result and that this will reduce quality standards. This paper presents data from a study that explored with patients and GPs what personal care means and whether it has continuing importance to them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A semi-structured questionnaire was used to interview participants and Framework Analysis supported analysis of emerging themes. Twenty-nine patients, mainly women with young children, and twenty-three GPs were interviewed from seven practices in Lothian, Scotland, ranged by practice size and relative deprivation score.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>Personal care was defined mainly, though not exclusively, as care given within the context of a continuing relationship in which there is an interpersonal connection and the doctor adopts a particular consultation style. Defined in this way, it was reported to have benefits for both health outcomes and patients' experience of care. In particular, such care was thought to be beneficial in attending to the emotions that can be elicited when seeking and receiving health care and in enabling patients to be known by doctors as legitimate seekers of care from the health service. Its importance was described as being dependent upon the nature of the health problem and patients' wider familial and social circumstances. In particular, it was found to provide support to patients in their parenting and other familial caring roles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Personal care has continuing salience to patients and GPs in modern primary care in the UK. Patients equate the experience of care, not just outcomes, with high quality care. As it is mainly conceptualised and experienced as care within the context of a continuing relationship, policies and organisational arrangements that support and give incentives to this must be in place. These preferences are not strongly reflected in the QOF. Specific questions need to be addressed by future audit and research on the impact of the contract on these aspects of service.</p>","PeriodicalId":87450,"journal":{"name":"Osteopathic medicine and primary care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1750-4732-1-13","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteopathic medicine and primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-4732-1-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: Recent policy and organisational changes within UK primary care have emphasised graduated access to care, speed of access to the first available general practitioner (GP) and care being provided by a range of healthcare professionals. These trends have been strengthened by the current GP contract and Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). Concern has been expressed that the potential for personal care is being diminished as a result and that this will reduce quality standards. This paper presents data from a study that explored with patients and GPs what personal care means and whether it has continuing importance to them.

Methods: A semi-structured questionnaire was used to interview participants and Framework Analysis supported analysis of emerging themes. Twenty-nine patients, mainly women with young children, and twenty-three GPs were interviewed from seven practices in Lothian, Scotland, ranged by practice size and relative deprivation score.

Results and discussion: Personal care was defined mainly, though not exclusively, as care given within the context of a continuing relationship in which there is an interpersonal connection and the doctor adopts a particular consultation style. Defined in this way, it was reported to have benefits for both health outcomes and patients' experience of care. In particular, such care was thought to be beneficial in attending to the emotions that can be elicited when seeking and receiving health care and in enabling patients to be known by doctors as legitimate seekers of care from the health service. Its importance was described as being dependent upon the nature of the health problem and patients' wider familial and social circumstances. In particular, it was found to provide support to patients in their parenting and other familial caring roles.

Conclusion: Personal care has continuing salience to patients and GPs in modern primary care in the UK. Patients equate the experience of care, not just outcomes, with high quality care. As it is mainly conceptualised and experienced as care within the context of a continuing relationship, policies and organisational arrangements that support and give incentives to this must be in place. These preferences are not strongly reflected in the QOF. Specific questions need to be addressed by future audit and research on the impact of the contract on these aspects of service.

英国的“个人护理”和全科医生:对患者和全科医生的定性访谈研究。
背景:最近的政策和组织变化在英国初级保健已经强调毕业获得护理,速度获得第一个可用的全科医生(GP)和护理由一系列医疗保健专业人员提供。目前的全科医生合同和质量与成果框架(QOF)加强了这些趋势。有人表示担心,个人护理的潜力因此而减少,这将降低质量标准。本文提供了一项研究的数据,该研究与患者和全科医生一起探讨了个人护理的意义以及它是否对他们具有持续的重要性。方法:采用半结构化问卷对研究对象进行访谈,并采用框架分析法对新兴主题进行分析。29名患者(主要是带小孩的妇女)和23名全科医生接受了采访,他们来自苏格兰洛锡安的7家诊所,按诊所规模和相对剥夺评分进行了排序。结果和讨论:个人护理的定义主要是,虽然不是唯一的,是在持续关系的背景下提供的护理,在这种关系中存在人际关系,医生采用特定的咨询方式。根据这种定义,据报道,它对健康结果和患者的护理体验都有好处。特别是,这种护理被认为有利于照顾在寻求和接受保健服务时可能引起的情绪,并使医生知道病人是向保健服务机构寻求保健的合法求助者。它的重要性取决于健康问题的性质和病人更广泛的家庭和社会环境。特别是,它被发现为患者在养育子女和其他家庭照顾角色方面提供支持。结论:个人护理在英国的现代初级保健中对患者和全科医生具有持续的显著性。患者将护理的体验,而不仅仅是结果,等同于高质量的护理。由于它主要是在一种持续关系的背景下被概念化和体验到的,支持和激励这一点的政策和组织安排必须到位。这些偏好并没有强烈地反映在QOF中。未来审计和研究合同对服务这些方面的影响时,需要解决具体问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信