Quantitative and molecular genetic variation in sympatric populations of Medicago laciniata and M. truncatula (Fabaceae): relationships with eco-geographical factors.

Mounawer Badri, Houcine Ilahi, Thierry Huguet, Mohamed Elarbi Aouani
{"title":"Quantitative and molecular genetic variation in sympatric populations of Medicago laciniata and M. truncatula (Fabaceae): relationships with eco-geographical factors.","authors":"Mounawer Badri,&nbsp;Houcine Ilahi,&nbsp;Thierry Huguet,&nbsp;Mohamed Elarbi Aouani","doi":"10.1017/S0016672307008725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medicago laciniata is restricted to south of the Mediterranean basin and it extends in Tunisia from the inferior semi-arid to Saharan stages, whereas M. truncatula is a widespread species in such areas. The genetic variability in four Tunisian sympatric populations of M. laciniata and M. truncatula was analysed using 19 quantitative traits and 20 microsatellites. We investigated the amplification transferability of 52 microsatellites developed in M. truncatula to M. laciniata. Results indicate that about 78.85% of used markers are valuable genetic markers for M. laciniata. M. laciniata displayed significantly lower quantitative differentiation among populations (QST=0.12) than did M. truncatula (QST=0.45). However, high molecular differentiations, with no significant difference, were observed in M. laciniata (FST=0.48) and M. truncatula (FST=0.47). Several quantitative traits exhibited significantly smaller QST than FST for M. laciniata, consistent with constraining selection. For M. truncatula, the majority of traits displayed no statistical difference in the level of QST and FST. Furthermore, these traits are significantly associated with eco-geographical factors, consistent with selection for local adaptation rather than genetic drift. In both species, there was no significant correlation between genetic variation at quantitative traits and molecular markers. The site-of-origin explains about 5.85% and 11.27% of total quantitative genetic variability among populations of M. laciniata and M. truncatula, respectively. Established correlations between quantitative traits and eco-geographical factors were generally more moderate for M. laciniata than for M. truncatula, suggesting that the two species exhibit different genetic bases of local adaptation to varying environmental conditions. Nevertheless, no consistent patterns of associations were found between gene diversity (He) and environmental factors in either species.</p>","PeriodicalId":12777,"journal":{"name":"Genetical research","volume":"89 2","pages":"107-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0016672307008725","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672307008725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

Medicago laciniata is restricted to south of the Mediterranean basin and it extends in Tunisia from the inferior semi-arid to Saharan stages, whereas M. truncatula is a widespread species in such areas. The genetic variability in four Tunisian sympatric populations of M. laciniata and M. truncatula was analysed using 19 quantitative traits and 20 microsatellites. We investigated the amplification transferability of 52 microsatellites developed in M. truncatula to M. laciniata. Results indicate that about 78.85% of used markers are valuable genetic markers for M. laciniata. M. laciniata displayed significantly lower quantitative differentiation among populations (QST=0.12) than did M. truncatula (QST=0.45). However, high molecular differentiations, with no significant difference, were observed in M. laciniata (FST=0.48) and M. truncatula (FST=0.47). Several quantitative traits exhibited significantly smaller QST than FST for M. laciniata, consistent with constraining selection. For M. truncatula, the majority of traits displayed no statistical difference in the level of QST and FST. Furthermore, these traits are significantly associated with eco-geographical factors, consistent with selection for local adaptation rather than genetic drift. In both species, there was no significant correlation between genetic variation at quantitative traits and molecular markers. The site-of-origin explains about 5.85% and 11.27% of total quantitative genetic variability among populations of M. laciniata and M. truncatula, respectively. Established correlations between quantitative traits and eco-geographical factors were generally more moderate for M. laciniata than for M. truncatula, suggesting that the two species exhibit different genetic bases of local adaptation to varying environmental conditions. Nevertheless, no consistent patterns of associations were found between gene diversity (He) and environmental factors in either species.

苜蓿科同域居群的数量和分子遗传变异:与生态地理因子的关系
苜蓿(Medicago laciniata)局限于地中海盆地南部,在突尼斯从次半干旱地区延伸到撒哈拉地区,而M. truncatula在这些地区是广泛分布的物种。利用19个数量性状和20个微卫星分析了4个突尼斯同域居群的遗传变异。研究了52个小卫星的扩增转移性。结果表明,78.85%的标记是有价值的遗传标记。种群间的数量分化(QST=0.12)显著低于短尾松(QST=0.45)。然而,在M. laciniata (FST=0.48)和M. truncatula (FST=0.47)中观察到高分子分化,但差异不显著。一些数量性状的QST显著小于FST,与约束选择一致。对于短尾草,大部分性状在QST和FST水平上无统计学差异。此外,这些性状与生态地理因素显著相关,与本地适应的选择一致,而不是遗传漂变。在这两个物种中,数量性状和分子标记的遗传变异没有显著的相关性。起源位点分别解释了5.85%和11.27%的总数量遗传变异。已建立的数量性状与生态地理因子的相关性总体上较为温和,表明两种物种对不同环境条件的局部适应具有不同的遗传基础。然而,在两个物种中,基因多样性(He)与环境因素之间没有一致的关联模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信