Surgical therapy of peripheral nerve lesions: current status and new perspectives.

Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie Pub Date : 2007-08-01 Epub Date: 2007-07-30 DOI:10.1055/s-2007-984453
U Dornseifer, K Matiasek, M A Fichter, A Rupp, J Henke, N Weidner, L Kovacs, W Schmahl, E Biemer, M Ninkovic, N A Papadopulos
{"title":"Surgical therapy of peripheral nerve lesions: current status and new perspectives.","authors":"U Dornseifer,&nbsp;K Matiasek,&nbsp;M A Fichter,&nbsp;A Rupp,&nbsp;J Henke,&nbsp;N Weidner,&nbsp;L Kovacs,&nbsp;W Schmahl,&nbsp;E Biemer,&nbsp;M Ninkovic,&nbsp;N A Papadopulos","doi":"10.1055/s-2007-984453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The severe functional deficits in patients suffering from traumatic peripheral nerve damage underline the necessity of an optimal therapy. The development of microsurgical techniques in the sixties contributed significantly to the progress in nerve repair. Since then, no major clinical innovation has become established. However, with an increased understanding of cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying nerve regeneration, various tubulization concepts have been developed which yield possible alternatives to direct suturing and to autologous nerve grafting in cases of short nerve defects. The vast knowledge gathered in the field of nerve regeneration needs to be further exploited in order to develop alternative therapeutic strategies to nerve autografting, which can result in donor-site defects and often lead to inappropriate results. Considering the encouraging results from preclinical studies, innovative nerve repair strategies are likely to improve the outcome of reconstructive surgical interventions. This paper outlines, in addition to the fundamentals of nerve regeneration, the current treatment options for defects of peripheral nerves. This article also reviews the developments in the use of alternative nerve guides and demonstrates new perspectives in the field of peripheral nerve reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":50708,"journal":{"name":"Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie","volume":"68 3","pages":"101-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2007-984453","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-984453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2007/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

The severe functional deficits in patients suffering from traumatic peripheral nerve damage underline the necessity of an optimal therapy. The development of microsurgical techniques in the sixties contributed significantly to the progress in nerve repair. Since then, no major clinical innovation has become established. However, with an increased understanding of cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying nerve regeneration, various tubulization concepts have been developed which yield possible alternatives to direct suturing and to autologous nerve grafting in cases of short nerve defects. The vast knowledge gathered in the field of nerve regeneration needs to be further exploited in order to develop alternative therapeutic strategies to nerve autografting, which can result in donor-site defects and often lead to inappropriate results. Considering the encouraging results from preclinical studies, innovative nerve repair strategies are likely to improve the outcome of reconstructive surgical interventions. This paper outlines, in addition to the fundamentals of nerve regeneration, the current treatment options for defects of peripheral nerves. This article also reviews the developments in the use of alternative nerve guides and demonstrates new perspectives in the field of peripheral nerve reconstruction.

周围神经病变的外科治疗:现状与新观点。
外伤性周围神经损伤患者的严重功能缺陷强调了最佳治疗的必要性。60年代显微外科技术的发展对神经修复技术的进步作出了重要贡献。从那以后,没有重大的临床创新得以确立。然而,随着对神经再生的细胞和分子机制的了解的增加,各种管化概念已经发展起来,在短神经缺损的情况下,可能替代直接缝合和自体神经移植。在神经再生领域收集的大量知识需要进一步利用,以制定替代神经自体移植的治疗策略,这可能导致供体部位缺陷,往往导致不适当的结果。考虑到临床前研究的令人鼓舞的结果,创新的神经修复策略可能会改善重建手术干预的结果。除了神经再生的基本原理外,本文还概述了目前周围神经缺损的治疗选择。本文还回顾了替代神经导片的应用进展,并展示了周围神经重建领域的新前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie
Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie 医学-神经科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信