Nano-Bio-Genesis: tracing the rise of nanotechnology and nanobiotechnology as 'big science'.

Rajan P Kulkarni
{"title":"Nano-Bio-Genesis: tracing the rise of nanotechnology and nanobiotechnology as 'big science'.","authors":"Rajan P Kulkarni","doi":"10.1186/1747-5333-2-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p> Nanotechnology research has lately been of intense interest because of its perceived potential for many diverse fields of science. Nanotechnology's tools have found application in diverse fields, from biology to device physics. By the 1990s, there was a concerted effort in the United States to develop a national initiative to promote such research. The success of this effort led to a significant influx of resources and interest in nanotechnology and nanobiotechnology and to the establishment of centralized research programs and facilities. Further government initiatives (at federal, state, and local levels) have firmly cemented these disciplines as 'big science,' with efforts increasingly concentrated at select laboratories and centers. In many respects, these trends mirror certain changes in academic science over the past twenty years, with a greater emphasis on applied science and research that can be more directly utilized for commercial applications.We also compare the National Nanotechnology Initiative and its successors to the Human Genome Project, another large-scale, government funded initiative. These precedents made acceptance of shifts in nanotechnology easier for researchers to accept, as they followed trends already established within most fields of science. Finally, these trends are examined in the design of technologies for detection and treatment of cancer, through the Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer initiative of the National Cancer Institute. Federal funding of these nanotechnology initiatives has allowed for expansion into diverse fields and the impetus for expanding the scope of research of several fields, especially biomedicine, though the ultimate utility and impact of all these efforts remains to be seen.</p>","PeriodicalId":87404,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical discovery and collaboration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1747-5333-2-3","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical discovery and collaboration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5333-2-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Nanotechnology research has lately been of intense interest because of its perceived potential for many diverse fields of science. Nanotechnology's tools have found application in diverse fields, from biology to device physics. By the 1990s, there was a concerted effort in the United States to develop a national initiative to promote such research. The success of this effort led to a significant influx of resources and interest in nanotechnology and nanobiotechnology and to the establishment of centralized research programs and facilities. Further government initiatives (at federal, state, and local levels) have firmly cemented these disciplines as 'big science,' with efforts increasingly concentrated at select laboratories and centers. In many respects, these trends mirror certain changes in academic science over the past twenty years, with a greater emphasis on applied science and research that can be more directly utilized for commercial applications.We also compare the National Nanotechnology Initiative and its successors to the Human Genome Project, another large-scale, government funded initiative. These precedents made acceptance of shifts in nanotechnology easier for researchers to accept, as they followed trends already established within most fields of science. Finally, these trends are examined in the design of technologies for detection and treatment of cancer, through the Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer initiative of the National Cancer Institute. Federal funding of these nanotechnology initiatives has allowed for expansion into diverse fields and the impetus for expanding the scope of research of several fields, especially biomedicine, though the ultimate utility and impact of all these efforts remains to be seen.

纳米生物起源:追踪纳米技术和纳米生物技术作为“大科学”的兴起。
纳米技术的研究最近引起了人们的强烈兴趣,因为人们认为纳米技术在许多不同的科学领域具有潜力。纳米技术的工具已经在从生物学到设备物理学的各个领域得到了应用。到20世纪90年代,美国一致努力制定一项国家倡议,以促进这类研究。这一努力的成功导致了大量资源和对纳米技术和纳米生物技术的兴趣的涌入,并建立了集中的研究计划和设施。进一步的政府举措(联邦、州和地方各级)已将这些学科牢固地巩固为“大科学”,并越来越多地将努力集中在选定的实验室和中心。在许多方面,这些趋势反映了过去二十年来学术科学的某些变化,更加强调可以更直接地用于商业应用的应用科学和研究。我们还将国家纳米技术计划及其后继计划与另一个由政府资助的大规模计划——人类基因组计划进行了比较。这些先例使得科学家更容易接受纳米技术的转变,因为它们遵循了大多数科学领域已经确立的趋势。最后,通过国家癌症研究所的纳米技术癌症联盟倡议,在癌症检测和治疗技术的设计中检查了这些趋势。联邦政府对这些纳米技术项目的资助使其得以扩展到不同的领域,并推动了几个领域的研究范围的扩大,尤其是生物医学,尽管所有这些努力的最终效用和影响还有待观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信