Evaluation of three antimicrobial regimens used as metaphylaxis in stocker calves at high risk of developing bovine respiratory disease.

Veterinary Therapeutics Pub Date : 2007-01-01
D L Step, Terry Engelken, Cristina Romano, Ben Holland, Clint Krehbiel, John C Johnson, W Lawrence Bryson, Cassius M Tucker, Edward J Robb
{"title":"Evaluation of three antimicrobial regimens used as metaphylaxis in stocker calves at high risk of developing bovine respiratory disease.","authors":"D L Step,&nbsp;Terry Engelken,&nbsp;Cristina Romano,&nbsp;Ben Holland,&nbsp;Clint Krehbiel,&nbsp;John C Johnson,&nbsp;W Lawrence Bryson,&nbsp;Cassius M Tucker,&nbsp;Edward J Robb","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A total of 894 calves at high risk for bovine respiratory disease were processed at two sites and randomly assigned to receive one of three antimicrobial metaphylactic regimens to determine if a two-drug regimen offered any advantage over the more conventional one-course regimens. On arrival, calves received either a two-course regimen of ceftiofur crystalline free acid (CCFA) followed by tulathromycin 8 days later (Group 1) or a one-course regiment of CCFA (Group 2) or tilmicosin (Group 3). At Site A, morbidity was significantly lower (52%) in Group 1 than in Group 2 (76.3%) and Group 3 (78.4%). At Site B, morbidity was significantly lower in Group 1 (2.6%) than in Group 2 (9.4%) and Group 3 (7.2%).</p>","PeriodicalId":51211,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Therapeutics","volume":"8 2","pages":"136-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A total of 894 calves at high risk for bovine respiratory disease were processed at two sites and randomly assigned to receive one of three antimicrobial metaphylactic regimens to determine if a two-drug regimen offered any advantage over the more conventional one-course regimens. On arrival, calves received either a two-course regimen of ceftiofur crystalline free acid (CCFA) followed by tulathromycin 8 days later (Group 1) or a one-course regiment of CCFA (Group 2) or tilmicosin (Group 3). At Site A, morbidity was significantly lower (52%) in Group 1 than in Group 2 (76.3%) and Group 3 (78.4%). At Site B, morbidity was significantly lower in Group 1 (2.6%) than in Group 2 (9.4%) and Group 3 (7.2%).

评估三种抗菌方案作为过敏反应在高风险的牛呼吸道疾病的储存小牛。
共有894头牛呼吸道疾病高风险小牛在两个地点进行处理,并随机分配接受三种抗微生物变态反应方案中的一种,以确定两种药物方案是否比更传统的单疗程方案有任何优势。犊牛到达后,接受两疗程的头孢替弗晶体游离酸(CCFA)治疗,8天后接受图拉霉素治疗(第1组),或接受一疗程的CCFA治疗(第2组)或替米考星治疗(第3组)。在a点,1组的发病率(52%)明显低于2组(76.3%)和3组(78.4%)。在B点,1组的发病率(2.6%)明显低于2组(9.4%)和3组(7.2%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信