Posterior instrumentation of the cervical spine with a versatile modular fixation system.

M Stoffel, M Behr, F Ringel, C Stuer, B Meyer
{"title":"Posterior instrumentation of the cervical spine with a versatile modular fixation system.","authors":"M Stoffel,&nbsp;M Behr,&nbsp;F Ringel,&nbsp;C Stuer,&nbsp;B Meyer","doi":"10.1055/s-2007-980171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Object: </strong>To study the feasibility/suitability of posterior instrumentation of the entire cervical and upper thoracic spine (C0-Th5) for a broad spectrum of indications in a predominantly old-aged and co-morbid patient population using a novel occipito-cervico-thoracic system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>54 consecutive patients (m=31, f=23, median age 63) with degenerative, neoplastic, traumatic, or infectious diseases were treated over a period of 29 months. Primary posterior as well as secondary posterior approaches after anterior instrumentation were used. Clinical and radiographic data was acquired prospectively using standard scales at pre-defined time intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average 3 segments (range: 1-6) were bridged without significant intraoperative complications. In 30 cases a posterior decompression was additionally performed. Nine of 315 implanted screws were defined as suboptimal, leading to operative revision in 5 cases. During the follow-up interval (9+/-1.1 months, range: 3-25) patients showed a statistically significant improved mobility (Karnofsky score: 58+/-3 [pre] compared to 75+/-3 [post]) with improved mental and physical health (SF-36 health survey: mental component 44 [pre] to 51 [post], physical component 34 [pre] to 44 [post]) and less subjective pain (VAS: 3.9+/-0.3 [pre] to 0.5+/-0.1 [post]). All patients remained neurologically stable or improved after operation except two, who transiently deteriorated by one Nurick grade. Only one dislocation and no breakages of the implanted hardware were seen, and no significant secondary loss of spinal alignment was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Posterior instrumentation of the entire cervical and upper thoracic spine with the novel occipito-cervico-thoracic system has been shown to be safe, convenient and effective. The anterior approach in high-risk patients can thus be avoided, and the approach provides substantial additional stability to multi-level anterior constructs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50708,"journal":{"name":"Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie","volume":"68 2","pages":"50-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2007-980171","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-980171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Object: To study the feasibility/suitability of posterior instrumentation of the entire cervical and upper thoracic spine (C0-Th5) for a broad spectrum of indications in a predominantly old-aged and co-morbid patient population using a novel occipito-cervico-thoracic system.

Methods: 54 consecutive patients (m=31, f=23, median age 63) with degenerative, neoplastic, traumatic, or infectious diseases were treated over a period of 29 months. Primary posterior as well as secondary posterior approaches after anterior instrumentation were used. Clinical and radiographic data was acquired prospectively using standard scales at pre-defined time intervals.

Results: On average 3 segments (range: 1-6) were bridged without significant intraoperative complications. In 30 cases a posterior decompression was additionally performed. Nine of 315 implanted screws were defined as suboptimal, leading to operative revision in 5 cases. During the follow-up interval (9+/-1.1 months, range: 3-25) patients showed a statistically significant improved mobility (Karnofsky score: 58+/-3 [pre] compared to 75+/-3 [post]) with improved mental and physical health (SF-36 health survey: mental component 44 [pre] to 51 [post], physical component 34 [pre] to 44 [post]) and less subjective pain (VAS: 3.9+/-0.3 [pre] to 0.5+/-0.1 [post]). All patients remained neurologically stable or improved after operation except two, who transiently deteriorated by one Nurick grade. Only one dislocation and no breakages of the implanted hardware were seen, and no significant secondary loss of spinal alignment was observed.

Conclusions: Posterior instrumentation of the entire cervical and upper thoracic spine with the novel occipito-cervico-thoracic system has been shown to be safe, convenient and effective. The anterior approach in high-risk patients can thus be avoided, and the approach provides substantial additional stability to multi-level anterior constructs.

颈椎后路内固定采用多功能模块固定系统。
目的:研究一种新型枕-颈-胸系统在广泛适应症中应用于全颈-上胸椎后路内固定(C0-Th5)的可行性/适用性。方法:54例患有退行性、肿瘤性、外伤性或感染性疾病的患者(m=31, f=23,中位年龄63),连续治疗29个月。采用前路内固定后的初级后路和次级后路入路。在预先定义的时间间隔内使用标准量表前瞻性地获得临床和放射学数据。结果:平均桥接3节段(范围1 ~ 6节段),无明显术中并发症。30例患者行后路减压术。315例植入螺钉中有9例被定义为次优,导致5例手术翻修。在随访期间(9+/-1.1个月,范围:3-25),患者表现出具有统计学意义的活动能力改善(Karnofsky评分:58+/-3[前],75+/-3[后]),精神和身体健康状况改善(SF-36健康调查:精神成分44[前]至51[后],身体成分34[前]至44[后]),主观疼痛减轻(VAS: 3.9+/-0.3[前]至0.5+/-0.1[后])。所有患者术后神经系统均保持稳定或改善,但有2例患者短暂恶化1级。仅一例脱位,未见植入内固定物断裂,未观察到明显的继发性脊柱对齐丢失。结论:新型枕颈胸系统后路内固定整个颈上胸椎安全、方便、有效。因此,高危患者可以避免前路入路,并且该入路为多级前路结构提供了大量额外的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie
Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie 医学-神经科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信