Mortality ascertainment of participants in the National Wilms Tumor Study using the National Death Index: comparison of active and passive follow-up results.

Cecilia A Cotton, Susan Peterson, Patricia A Norkool, Norman E Breslow
{"title":"Mortality ascertainment of participants in the National Wilms Tumor Study using the National Death Index: comparison of active and passive follow-up results.","authors":"Cecilia A Cotton, Susan Peterson, Patricia A Norkool, Norman E Breslow","doi":"10.1186/1742-5573-4-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Long term studies of childhood cancer survivors are hampered by difficulties in tracking young adult participants. After performing a National Death Index (NDI) search we sought to identify which factors best predicted a match among known decedents from the National Wilms Tumor Study (NWTS) and to determine if record linkage could substitute for missing follow-up in a cohort of NWTS survivors. To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare passive mortality follow-up using the NDI to active follow-up of a childhood and young adult population. Records for 984 known decedents and 3,406 subjects whose January 1, 2002 vital status was unknown were sent to the NDI in June 2003. In April 2005 NWTS follow-up records were used to reassess January 1, 2002 vital status. Matches were established for 709 of 789 known decedents (sensitivity 89.9%) with a date of death between 1979 and 2001, the calendar period covered by the NDI at the time of the search. No matches were identified among 1,052 subjects known to be alive in 2002 (specificity 100%). Factors associated with decreased sensitivity were an unknown social security number (sensitivity 87.8%), Hispanic ethnicity (76.4%) and foreign birth (56.5%). For 2,351 subjects with 2002 vital status unknown who had 13,166 pre 2002 person-years of missing observation, only 18 deaths were ascertained by the NDI whereas 79.3 were expected based on NWTS mortality data. Mortality analyses based strictly on NDI search results and those based on NWTS follow-up augmented with NDI search results yielded inflated estimates of the 15 year survival rate when compared with estimates based on NWTS active follow-up. Match rates were comparable to those observed in adult populations. Since the same selection factors were likely associated with NDI failure to match and NWTS loss to follow-up, use of the NDI to fill in missing follow-up data appears unwarranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":87082,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologic perspectives & innovations : EP+I","volume":"4 ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1934904/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologic perspectives & innovations : EP+I","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5573-4-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Long term studies of childhood cancer survivors are hampered by difficulties in tracking young adult participants. After performing a National Death Index (NDI) search we sought to identify which factors best predicted a match among known decedents from the National Wilms Tumor Study (NWTS) and to determine if record linkage could substitute for missing follow-up in a cohort of NWTS survivors. To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare passive mortality follow-up using the NDI to active follow-up of a childhood and young adult population. Records for 984 known decedents and 3,406 subjects whose January 1, 2002 vital status was unknown were sent to the NDI in June 2003. In April 2005 NWTS follow-up records were used to reassess January 1, 2002 vital status. Matches were established for 709 of 789 known decedents (sensitivity 89.9%) with a date of death between 1979 and 2001, the calendar period covered by the NDI at the time of the search. No matches were identified among 1,052 subjects known to be alive in 2002 (specificity 100%). Factors associated with decreased sensitivity were an unknown social security number (sensitivity 87.8%), Hispanic ethnicity (76.4%) and foreign birth (56.5%). For 2,351 subjects with 2002 vital status unknown who had 13,166 pre 2002 person-years of missing observation, only 18 deaths were ascertained by the NDI whereas 79.3 were expected based on NWTS mortality data. Mortality analyses based strictly on NDI search results and those based on NWTS follow-up augmented with NDI search results yielded inflated estimates of the 15 year survival rate when compared with estimates based on NWTS active follow-up. Match rates were comparable to those observed in adult populations. Since the same selection factors were likely associated with NDI failure to match and NWTS loss to follow-up, use of the NDI to fill in missing follow-up data appears unwarranted.

Abstract Image

利用全国死亡指数确定全国威尔姆斯肿瘤研究参与者的死亡率:主动和被动随访结果的比较。
对儿童癌症幸存者的长期研究因难以追踪年轻的成年参与者而受到阻碍。在对全国死亡指数(NDI)进行搜索后,我们试图确定哪些因素最能预测全国威尔姆斯肿瘤研究(NWTS)中已知死者的匹配情况,并确定记录链接是否能替代 NWTS 幸存者队列中缺失的随访。据我们所知,这是第一项将使用 NDI 进行的被动死亡率随访与对儿童和青少年群体进行的主动随访进行比较的研究。2003 年 6 月,984 名已知死者和 3406 名 2002 年 1 月 1 日生命状态未知者的记录被发送至 NDI。2005 年 4 月,利用 NWTS 跟踪记录重新评估了 2002 年 1 月 1 日的生命状态。在 789 位已知死者中,有 709 位(灵敏度为 89.9%)的死亡日期在 1979 年至 2001 年之间,即搜索时 NDI 所覆盖的日历期间,与之建立了匹配。在 1052 位已知在 2002 年还活着的受试者中,没有发现匹配者(特异性为 100%)。与灵敏度降低相关的因素有:未知的社会保障号码(灵敏度为 87.8%)、西班牙裔(76.4%)和在国外出生(56.5%)。在 2002 年生命状态未知的 2351 名受试者中,2002 年前有 13,166 人年的观察数据缺失,其中只有 18 人的死亡是通过 NDI 确定的,而根据 NWTS 的死亡率数据,预计会有 79.3 人死亡。严格基于 NDI 搜索结果的死亡率分析,以及基于 NWTS 随访结果和 NDI 搜索结果的死亡率分析,与基于 NWTS 有效随访结果的 15 年存活率估计值相比,得出的存活率估计值偏高。匹配率与在成年人群中观察到的匹配率相当。由于 NDI 未匹配和 NWTS 失去随访可能与相同的选择因素有关,因此使用 NDI 来填补缺失的随访数据似乎没有必要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信