The effects of high-dose amlodipine/benazepril combination therapies on blood pressure reduction in patients not adequately controlled with amlodipine monotherapy.

Steven G Chrysant, Daniel H Sugimoto, Marty Lefkowitz, Thomas Salko, Mahmudul Khan, Vipin Arora, Victor Shi
{"title":"The effects of high-dose amlodipine/benazepril combination therapies on blood pressure reduction in patients not adequately controlled with amlodipine monotherapy.","authors":"Steven G Chrysant,&nbsp;Daniel H Sugimoto,&nbsp;Marty Lefkowitz,&nbsp;Thomas Salko,&nbsp;Mahmudul Khan,&nbsp;Vipin Arora,&nbsp;Victor Shi","doi":"10.1080/08038020701189828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. This study compared the efficacy and safety of amlodipine/benazepril (10/40 mg/day and 10/20 mg/day) with amlodipine 10 mg/day in patients whose blood pressure (BP) was not adequately controlled with amlodipine monotherapy. Methods. After a lead‐in period with amlodipine monotherapy, 812 non‐responder patients (mean sitting diastolic BP⩾95 mmHg) were randomized to one of three treatment groups. Ambulatory BP monitoring was conducted in 276 patients. Results. Treatment with amlodipine/benazepril 10/40 mg/day and 10/20 mg/day resulted in a decrease of mean sitting systolic and mean sitting diastolic BP by 13.3/12.7 mmHg and 12.1/11.6 mmHg, respectively, compared with monotherapy (6.6/8.5 mmHg) (p<0.0001). Both combinations resulted in more responders than monotherapy (74% and 65% vs. 54%; p<0.0001 and p<0.0085, respectively). Amlodipine/benazepril 10/40 mg/day and 10/20 mg/day decreased ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP by 9.9/6.7 mmHg and 7.4/5.2 mmHg compared with monotherapy (p<0.0001). The incidence of pedal edema was lower in the amlodipine/benazepril combinations compared with monotherapy (4.5%, 5.5% vs. 9.2%, respectively, p = NS). No significant metabolic side‐effects were noted among the combination groups. Conclusion. Amlodipine/benazepril combinations were well tolerated and resulted in significant BP reductions and better BP responder rates than amlodipine monotherapy.","PeriodicalId":8974,"journal":{"name":"Blood pressure. Supplement","volume":"1 ","pages":"10-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08038020701189828","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood pressure. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08038020701189828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background. This study compared the efficacy and safety of amlodipine/benazepril (10/40 mg/day and 10/20 mg/day) with amlodipine 10 mg/day in patients whose blood pressure (BP) was not adequately controlled with amlodipine monotherapy. Methods. After a lead‐in period with amlodipine monotherapy, 812 non‐responder patients (mean sitting diastolic BP⩾95 mmHg) were randomized to one of three treatment groups. Ambulatory BP monitoring was conducted in 276 patients. Results. Treatment with amlodipine/benazepril 10/40 mg/day and 10/20 mg/day resulted in a decrease of mean sitting systolic and mean sitting diastolic BP by 13.3/12.7 mmHg and 12.1/11.6 mmHg, respectively, compared with monotherapy (6.6/8.5 mmHg) (p<0.0001). Both combinations resulted in more responders than monotherapy (74% and 65% vs. 54%; p<0.0001 and p<0.0085, respectively). Amlodipine/benazepril 10/40 mg/day and 10/20 mg/day decreased ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP by 9.9/6.7 mmHg and 7.4/5.2 mmHg compared with monotherapy (p<0.0001). The incidence of pedal edema was lower in the amlodipine/benazepril combinations compared with monotherapy (4.5%, 5.5% vs. 9.2%, respectively, p = NS). No significant metabolic side‐effects were noted among the combination groups. Conclusion. Amlodipine/benazepril combinations were well tolerated and resulted in significant BP reductions and better BP responder rates than amlodipine monotherapy.
大剂量氨氯地平/苯那普利联合治疗对氨氯地平单药控制不充分的患者的降压效果。
背景:本研究比较氨氯地平/苯那普利(10/ 40mg /day和10/ 20mg /day)与氨氯地平10mg /day在氨氯地平单药治疗血压控制不充分的患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:在引入氨氯地平单药治疗后,812例无反应患者(平均坐位舒张压>或=95 mmHg)随机分为三个治疗组。276例患者进行动态血压监测。结果:与单药治疗(6.6/8.5 mmHg)相比,氨氯地平/苯那普利10/40 mg/天和10/20 mg/天治疗可使平均坐位收缩压和平均坐位舒张压分别降低13.3/12.7 mmHg和12.1/11.6 mmHg (p < 0.0001)。两种联合治疗的应答率均高于单药治疗(74%和65% vs. 54%;P < 0.0001和P < 0.0085)。与单药治疗相比,氨氯地平/苯那普利10/40 mg/天和10/20 mg/天使动态收缩压和舒张压分别降低9.9/6.7 mmHg和7.4/5.2 mmHg (p < 0.0001)。与单药治疗相比,氨氯地平/苯那普利联合治疗的足部水肿发生率较低(分别为4.5%、5.5%和9.2%,p=NS)。联合用药组未发现明显的代谢副作用。结论:与氨氯地平单药治疗相比,氨氯地平/苯那普利联合治疗耐受性良好,血压明显降低,血压反应率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信