Neurosurgical management of previously coiled recurrent intracranial aneurysms.

R W König, T Kretschmer, G Antoniadis, K Seitz, V Braun, H-P Richter, M Perez de Laborda, C Scheller, W Börm
{"title":"Neurosurgical management of previously coiled recurrent intracranial aneurysms.","authors":"R W König,&nbsp;T Kretschmer,&nbsp;G Antoniadis,&nbsp;K Seitz,&nbsp;V Braun,&nbsp;H-P Richter,&nbsp;M Perez de Laborda,&nbsp;C Scheller,&nbsp;W Börm","doi":"10.1055/s-2007-968164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms with detachable coils has proven to be a save and effective treatment. But long-term recurrence due to aneurysm regrowth or coil compaction has been reported in up to thirty percent of cases. Therefore a growing number of previously coiled aneurysms have to be retreated by coiling or, in some circumstances, by clipping. We present a consecutive series of ten patients who underwent surgical clipping for recurrent aneurysms after primary coil embolization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During a 4-year period ten patients with intracranial aneurysms previously treated by coil embolization underwent surgery for clipping of recanalized aneurysms. All aneurysms were located in the anterior circulation (internal carotid artery [ICA], 2; middle cerebral artery [MCA], 3; anterior communicating artery [AcomA], 5). Clinical data and imaging studies of the patients were analyzed retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All recurrences were detected by routine control angiograms within a median period of 14 months after primary treatment. In three aneurysms treated for SAH dense arachnoid scarring around the aneurysm sac was noted. In four cases, coils were found intraoperatively to be extruding through the aneurysm sac into the subarachnoid space. Each aneurysm could be clipped without affecting the perfusion of the parent vessel. In one patient the aneurysm sac including the coil package was resected. In one patient one of the central anteromedial arteries was injured during dissection due to dense arachnoid scarring because of prior SAH. As a consequence infarction of the head of the caudate nucleus without neurological compromise was observed on follow-up CT scans. Another patient developed transient aphasia due to vasospasm in the early postoperative period with complete restitution. In the end all patients had an uneventful recovery. Removal of the coil package was not necessary in most cases. Clipping of the aneurysm neck was possible even in cases with coil dislocation into the parent vessel.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clipping of previously coiled aneurysms is a unique problem for vascular neurosurgeons. In most cases clipping is feasible. Clipping should still be considered as a definite treatment option in previously coiled recurrent aneurysms. Results in this small series were good.</p>","PeriodicalId":50708,"journal":{"name":"Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie","volume":"68 1","pages":"8-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2007-968164","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-968164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

Objective: Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms with detachable coils has proven to be a save and effective treatment. But long-term recurrence due to aneurysm regrowth or coil compaction has been reported in up to thirty percent of cases. Therefore a growing number of previously coiled aneurysms have to be retreated by coiling or, in some circumstances, by clipping. We present a consecutive series of ten patients who underwent surgical clipping for recurrent aneurysms after primary coil embolization.

Methods: During a 4-year period ten patients with intracranial aneurysms previously treated by coil embolization underwent surgery for clipping of recanalized aneurysms. All aneurysms were located in the anterior circulation (internal carotid artery [ICA], 2; middle cerebral artery [MCA], 3; anterior communicating artery [AcomA], 5). Clinical data and imaging studies of the patients were analyzed retrospectively.

Results: All recurrences were detected by routine control angiograms within a median period of 14 months after primary treatment. In three aneurysms treated for SAH dense arachnoid scarring around the aneurysm sac was noted. In four cases, coils were found intraoperatively to be extruding through the aneurysm sac into the subarachnoid space. Each aneurysm could be clipped without affecting the perfusion of the parent vessel. In one patient the aneurysm sac including the coil package was resected. In one patient one of the central anteromedial arteries was injured during dissection due to dense arachnoid scarring because of prior SAH. As a consequence infarction of the head of the caudate nucleus without neurological compromise was observed on follow-up CT scans. Another patient developed transient aphasia due to vasospasm in the early postoperative period with complete restitution. In the end all patients had an uneventful recovery. Removal of the coil package was not necessary in most cases. Clipping of the aneurysm neck was possible even in cases with coil dislocation into the parent vessel.

Conclusion: Clipping of previously coiled aneurysms is a unique problem for vascular neurosurgeons. In most cases clipping is feasible. Clipping should still be considered as a definite treatment option in previously coiled recurrent aneurysms. Results in this small series were good.

既往盘绕性复发性颅内动脉瘤的神经外科治疗。
目的:采用可拆卸线圈在血管内治疗脑动脉瘤是一种有效的治疗方法。但据报道,由于动脉瘤再生或线圈压实导致长期复发的病例高达30%。因此,越来越多的先前缠绕的动脉瘤必须通过缠绕或在某些情况下通过夹取来切除。我们报告了连续的10例患者,他们在原发性动脉瘤栓塞后接受手术夹持治疗复发性动脉瘤。方法:在4年的时间里,10例颅内动脉瘤患者接受了线圈栓塞治疗,手术切除了再通动脉瘤。所有动脉瘤均位于前循环(颈内动脉[ICA], 2;大脑中动脉[MCA], 3;前交通动脉[AcomA], 5)。回顾性分析患者的临床资料及影像学研究。结果:所有复发均在初次治疗后14个月内通过常规对照血管造影检测到。在三个因SAH治疗的动脉瘤中,动脉瘤囊周围有致密的蛛网膜瘢痕。在4例中,术中发现线圈穿过动脉瘤囊进入蛛网膜下腔。每个动脉瘤都可以在不影响主血管灌注的情况下被夹住。在一个病人动脉瘤囊包括线圈包被切除。在一名患者中,由于先前的SAH造成了密集的蛛网膜瘢痕,在剥离过程中损伤了一条中央前内侧动脉。结果,在后续的CT扫描中观察到尾状核头部梗死而没有神经损伤。另一例患者术后早期因血管痉挛出现一过性失语,术后完全恢复。最后,所有病人都平安无事地康复了。在大多数情况下,不需要拆卸线圈包。夹住动脉瘤颈是可能的,即使在情况下,线圈脱位到主血管。结论:对血管神经外科医生来说,夹闭先前卷曲的动脉瘤是一个独特的问题。在大多数情况下,裁剪是可行的。对于先前盘绕的复发性动脉瘤,仍应考虑将夹闭作为一种明确的治疗选择。这个小系列的结果很好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie
Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie 医学-神经科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信