Why do they do it? A pilot study towards understanding participant motivation and experience in a large genetic epidemiological study of endometriosis.

Susan A Treloar, Katherine I Morley, Sandra D Taylor, Wayne D Hall
{"title":"Why do they do it? A pilot study towards understanding participant motivation and experience in a large genetic epidemiological study of endometriosis.","authors":"Susan A Treloar,&nbsp;Katherine I Morley,&nbsp;Sandra D Taylor,&nbsp;Wayne D Hall","doi":"10.1159/000099083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This exploratory, pilot study aimed to investigate motivations and reflections of participants who had provided epidemiological information, blood samples and access to clinical records and data in a large genetic epidemiological study of endometriosis, a common multifactorial disorder affecting women. We also aimed to explore understanding of complex genetic or multifactorial conditions in general.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In-depth interviews were conducted with 16 endometriosis study participants with diverse characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviewees generally described their participation in the genetic study using altruistic frameworks of reference. Themes that emerged included unquestioning willingness and consent to participate, little concern about privacy issues, desire for more information from the researchers about the condition rather than scientific progress, the benefits of research participation to family communication, and differing ideas about genetic influences on endometriosis. Specific features of endometriosis also influenced reflections on research participation experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As increasing numbers of individuals and families in the community become involved in genetic epidemiological studies of common diseases, more extensive research will be needed to better understand their expectations with a view to improving researchers' communications with study participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":80975,"journal":{"name":"Community genetics","volume":"10 2","pages":"61-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000099083","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000099083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

Objective: This exploratory, pilot study aimed to investigate motivations and reflections of participants who had provided epidemiological information, blood samples and access to clinical records and data in a large genetic epidemiological study of endometriosis, a common multifactorial disorder affecting women. We also aimed to explore understanding of complex genetic or multifactorial conditions in general.

Methods: In-depth interviews were conducted with 16 endometriosis study participants with diverse characteristics.

Results: Interviewees generally described their participation in the genetic study using altruistic frameworks of reference. Themes that emerged included unquestioning willingness and consent to participate, little concern about privacy issues, desire for more information from the researchers about the condition rather than scientific progress, the benefits of research participation to family communication, and differing ideas about genetic influences on endometriosis. Specific features of endometriosis also influenced reflections on research participation experience.

Conclusions: As increasing numbers of individuals and families in the community become involved in genetic epidemiological studies of common diseases, more extensive research will be needed to better understand their expectations with a view to improving researchers' communications with study participants.

他们为什么要这么做?一项旨在了解子宫内膜异位症大型遗传流行病学研究中参与者动机和经验的初步研究。
目的:这项探索性的试点研究旨在调查参与者的动机和思考,他们提供了流行病学信息、血液样本以及临床记录和数据,在一项大型的子宫内膜异位症遗传流行病学研究中,子宫内膜异位症是一种常见的影响女性的多因素疾病。我们还旨在探索对复杂遗传或多因素条件的理解。方法:对16名具有不同特征的子宫内膜异位症研究参与者进行深度访谈。结果:受访者一般使用利他的参考框架来描述他们参与基因研究。出现的主题包括毫无疑问的意愿和同意参与,很少关心隐私问题,希望从研究人员那里获得更多关于病情的信息,而不是科学进展,参与研究对家庭交流的好处,以及关于基因对子宫内膜异位症影响的不同看法。子宫内膜异位症的具体特点也影响了对参与研究经验的反思。结论:随着社区中越来越多的个人和家庭参与常见病的遗传流行病学研究,将需要进行更广泛的研究,以更好地了解他们的期望,从而改善研究人员与研究参与者的沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信