[The clinical application of Ephedrine Test in acoustic rhinometry].

Ke Lei, Xu Yang
{"title":"[The clinical application of Ephedrine Test in acoustic rhinometry].","authors":"Ke Lei,&nbsp;Xu Yang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To discuss the clinical application of Ephedrine Test in acoustic rhinometry, we studied the method of quantitative evaluation for nasal mucosal state and discriminated the objective parameters between simple rhinitis and hypertrophic rhinitis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Nasal cavity of volunteers from normal, simple and hypertrophic rhinitis patients were tested by acoustic rhinometry, the Nasal Airway Resistance (NAR), Nasal Cavity Volume (NCV), Nasal Minimal Cross-section Area (NMCA) and Distance of the minimal Cross-sectional Area from the Nostril (DCAN), their difference value and variational rate of pre or post Ephedrine Test were analyzed and compared.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The paired-samples data of pre-post Nasal Ephedrine Test showed that NAR, NCV, NMCA and DCAN had extremely significant difference (P < 0.01). NCV and NMCA had increased, NAR had reduced and DCAN had \"shifted forward\" after Ephedrine Test. All the parameters had extremely difference (P < 0.01) among multi-group at pre or post Ephedrine Test. Only NCV had significant difference before Ephedrine Test (P < 0.05). However, after Ephedrine Test, all of the parameters (include difference value and variational rate) had significant difference (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01) between simple and hypertrophic rhinitis patients. Compared with volunteers of normal nasal cavity: all of the parameters (include difference value and variational rate) had significant difference (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01) in simple rhinitis patients, but some of the parameters of their difference and variational rate had not significant in hypertrophic rhinitis patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The acoustic rhinometry test can objectively estimate the state of nasal mucosal and get more information combine with Ephedrine Test. It can expand the clinical application of acoustic rhinometry and is worth while recommending.</p>","PeriodicalId":79680,"journal":{"name":"Lin chuang er bi yan hou ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology","volume":"20 23","pages":"1072-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lin chuang er bi yan hou ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To discuss the clinical application of Ephedrine Test in acoustic rhinometry, we studied the method of quantitative evaluation for nasal mucosal state and discriminated the objective parameters between simple rhinitis and hypertrophic rhinitis.

Method: Nasal cavity of volunteers from normal, simple and hypertrophic rhinitis patients were tested by acoustic rhinometry, the Nasal Airway Resistance (NAR), Nasal Cavity Volume (NCV), Nasal Minimal Cross-section Area (NMCA) and Distance of the minimal Cross-sectional Area from the Nostril (DCAN), their difference value and variational rate of pre or post Ephedrine Test were analyzed and compared.

Result: The paired-samples data of pre-post Nasal Ephedrine Test showed that NAR, NCV, NMCA and DCAN had extremely significant difference (P < 0.01). NCV and NMCA had increased, NAR had reduced and DCAN had "shifted forward" after Ephedrine Test. All the parameters had extremely difference (P < 0.01) among multi-group at pre or post Ephedrine Test. Only NCV had significant difference before Ephedrine Test (P < 0.05). However, after Ephedrine Test, all of the parameters (include difference value and variational rate) had significant difference (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01) between simple and hypertrophic rhinitis patients. Compared with volunteers of normal nasal cavity: all of the parameters (include difference value and variational rate) had significant difference (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01) in simple rhinitis patients, but some of the parameters of their difference and variational rate had not significant in hypertrophic rhinitis patients.

Conclusion: The acoustic rhinometry test can objectively estimate the state of nasal mucosal and get more information combine with Ephedrine Test. It can expand the clinical application of acoustic rhinometry and is worth while recommending.

麻黄碱试验在鼻声测量中的临床应用
目的:探讨麻黄碱试验在声学鼻测量中的临床应用,研究鼻黏膜状态的定量评价方法,区分单纯性鼻炎和肥厚性鼻炎的客观参数。方法:对正常、单纯性和肥厚性鼻炎患者的鼻腔进行声鼻测量、鼻气道阻力(NAR)、鼻腔容积(NCV)、鼻最小横截面积(NMCA)、鼻最小横截面积到鼻孔的距离(DCAN),分析比较麻黄碱试验前后的差异值和变化率。结果:鼻麻黄碱试验前后配对样本数据显示,NAR、NCV、NMCA、DCAN差异极显著(P < 0.01)。麻黄素试验后,NCV、NMCA升高,NAR降低,DCAN“前移”。麻黄素试验前后各指标组间差异极显著(P < 0.01)。只有NCV在麻黄碱试验前有显著性差异(P < 0.05)。但经麻黄碱试验,单纯性鼻炎与肥厚性鼻炎患者的各项参数(包括差异值、变异率)差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05或P < 0.01)。与正常鼻腔志愿者相比,单纯性鼻炎患者各项参数(包括差异值和变化率)均有显著性差异(P < 0.05或P < 0.01),肥厚性鼻炎患者部分参数差异和变化率无显著性差异。结论:鼻声测量法与麻黄碱试验相结合,能客观地评价鼻黏膜的状态,获得更多的信息。可扩大鼻声测量的临床应用,值得推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信