Factors influencing publication choice: why faculty choose open access.

Stefanie E Warlick, Ktl Vaughan
{"title":"Factors influencing publication choice: why faculty choose open access.","authors":"Stefanie E Warlick,&nbsp;Ktl Vaughan","doi":"10.1186/1742-5581-4-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In an attempt to identify motivating factors involved in decisions to publish in open access and open archives (OA) journals, individual interviews with biomedical faculty members at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-Chapel Hill) and Duke University, two major research universities, were conducted. The interviews focused on faculty identified as early adopters of OA/free full-text publishing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Searches conducted in PubMed and PubMed Central identified faculty from the two institutions who have published works in OA/free full-text journals. The searches targeted authors with multiple OA citations during a specified 18 month period. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the most prolific OA authors at each university. Individual interviews attempted to determine whether the authors were aware they published in OA journals, why they chose to publish in OA journals, what factors influenced their publishing decisions, and their general attitude towards OA publishing models.</p><p><strong>Results & discussion: </strong>Fourteen interviews were granted and completed. Respondents included a fairly even mix of Assistant, Associate and Full professors. Results indicate that when targeting biomedical faculty at UNC-Chapel Hill and Duke, speed of publication and copyright retention are unlikely motivating factors or incentives for the promotion of OA publishing. In addition, author fees required by some open access journals are unlikely barriers or disincentives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It appears that publication quality is of utmost importance when choosing publication venues in general, while free access and visibility are specifically noted incentives for selection of OA journals. Therefore, free public availability and increased exposure may not be strong enough incentives for authors to choose open access over more traditional and respected subscription based publications, unless the quality issue is also addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":87058,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical digital libraries","volume":"4 ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1742-5581-4-1","citationCount":"125","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical digital libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-4-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 125

Abstract

Background: In an attempt to identify motivating factors involved in decisions to publish in open access and open archives (OA) journals, individual interviews with biomedical faculty members at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-Chapel Hill) and Duke University, two major research universities, were conducted. The interviews focused on faculty identified as early adopters of OA/free full-text publishing.

Methods: Searches conducted in PubMed and PubMed Central identified faculty from the two institutions who have published works in OA/free full-text journals. The searches targeted authors with multiple OA citations during a specified 18 month period. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the most prolific OA authors at each university. Individual interviews attempted to determine whether the authors were aware they published in OA journals, why they chose to publish in OA journals, what factors influenced their publishing decisions, and their general attitude towards OA publishing models.

Results & discussion: Fourteen interviews were granted and completed. Respondents included a fairly even mix of Assistant, Associate and Full professors. Results indicate that when targeting biomedical faculty at UNC-Chapel Hill and Duke, speed of publication and copyright retention are unlikely motivating factors or incentives for the promotion of OA publishing. In addition, author fees required by some open access journals are unlikely barriers or disincentives.

Conclusion: It appears that publication quality is of utmost importance when choosing publication venues in general, while free access and visibility are specifically noted incentives for selection of OA journals. Therefore, free public availability and increased exposure may not be strong enough incentives for authors to choose open access over more traditional and respected subscription based publications, unless the quality issue is also addressed.

影响出版选择的因素:教师为何选择开放获取。
背景:为了确定决定在开放获取和开放档案(OA)期刊上发表论文的激励因素,对北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校(UNC-Chapel Hill)和杜克大学两所主要研究型大学的生物医学教职员工进行了个人访谈。访谈的重点是被确定为OA/免费全文出版的早期采用者的教师。方法:在PubMed和PubMed Central进行检索,确定在OA/免费全文期刊上发表过作品的两所机构的教师。搜索目标是在指定的18个月期间多次被OA引用的作者。对每所大学最多产的OA作者进行了半结构化访谈。个别访谈试图确定作者是否意识到他们在开放获取期刊上发表文章,他们为什么选择在开放获取期刊上发表文章,哪些因素影响了他们的出版决策,以及他们对开放获取出版模式的总体态度。结果与讨论:14个访谈被批准并完成。受访者中有相当多的助理教授、副教授和正教授。结果表明,当针对北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校和杜克大学的生物医学教师时,出版速度和版权保留不太可能是促进OA出版的激励因素或激励因素。此外,一些开放获取期刊要求的作者费用不太可能成为障碍或阻碍。结论:一般来说,在选择出版场所时,出版质量是最重要的,而免费获取和可见性是选择OA期刊的特别注意的激励因素。因此,免费的公共可用性和增加的曝光率可能不足以激励作者选择开放获取而不是更传统的、受人尊敬的基于订阅的出版物,除非质量问题也得到了解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信