Morbidity management in the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis: a review of the scientific literature.

David G Addiss, Molly A Brady
{"title":"Morbidity management in the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis: a review of the scientific literature.","authors":"David G Addiss,&nbsp;Molly A Brady","doi":"10.1186/1475-2883-6-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF) has two major goals: to interrupt transmission of the parasite and to provide care for those who suffer the devastating clinical manifestations of the disease (morbidity control). This latter goal addresses three filariasis-related conditions: acute inflammatory episodes; lymphoedema; and hydrocele. Research during the last decade has confirmed the importance of bacteria as a cause of acute inflammatory episodes in filariasis-endemic areas, known as acute dermatolymphangioadenitis (ADLA). Current lymphoedema management strategies are based on the central role of ADLA as a trigger for lymphoedema progression. Simple intervention packages are in use that have resulted in dramatic reductions in ADLA rates, a lower prevalence of chronic inflammatory cells in the dermis and subdermis, and improvement in quality of life. During the past decade, the socioeconomic impact of ADLA and lymphoedema in filariasis-endemic areas has received increasing attention. Numerous operational research questions remain to be answered regarding how best to optimize, scale up, monitor, and evaluate lymphoedema management programmes. Of the clinical manifestations targeted by the GPELF, hydrocele has been the focus of the least attention. Basic information is lacking on the effectiveness and complications of hydrocele surgery and risk of post-operative hydrocele recurrence in filariasis-endemic areas. Data on the impact of mass administration of antifilarial drugs on filarial morbidity are inconsistent. Several studies report reductions in acute inflammatory episodes, lymphoedema, and/or hydrocele following mass drug administration, but other studies report no such association. Assessing the public health impact of mass treatment with antifilarial drugs is important for programme advocacy and morbidity control strategies. Thus, although our knowledge of filariasis-related morbidity and its treatment has expanded in recent years, much work remains to be done to address the needs of more than 40 million persons who suffer worldwide from these conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":84756,"journal":{"name":"Filaria journal","volume":"6 ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1475-2883-6-2","citationCount":"160","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filaria journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2883-6-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 160

Abstract

The Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF) has two major goals: to interrupt transmission of the parasite and to provide care for those who suffer the devastating clinical manifestations of the disease (morbidity control). This latter goal addresses three filariasis-related conditions: acute inflammatory episodes; lymphoedema; and hydrocele. Research during the last decade has confirmed the importance of bacteria as a cause of acute inflammatory episodes in filariasis-endemic areas, known as acute dermatolymphangioadenitis (ADLA). Current lymphoedema management strategies are based on the central role of ADLA as a trigger for lymphoedema progression. Simple intervention packages are in use that have resulted in dramatic reductions in ADLA rates, a lower prevalence of chronic inflammatory cells in the dermis and subdermis, and improvement in quality of life. During the past decade, the socioeconomic impact of ADLA and lymphoedema in filariasis-endemic areas has received increasing attention. Numerous operational research questions remain to be answered regarding how best to optimize, scale up, monitor, and evaluate lymphoedema management programmes. Of the clinical manifestations targeted by the GPELF, hydrocele has been the focus of the least attention. Basic information is lacking on the effectiveness and complications of hydrocele surgery and risk of post-operative hydrocele recurrence in filariasis-endemic areas. Data on the impact of mass administration of antifilarial drugs on filarial morbidity are inconsistent. Several studies report reductions in acute inflammatory episodes, lymphoedema, and/or hydrocele following mass drug administration, but other studies report no such association. Assessing the public health impact of mass treatment with antifilarial drugs is important for programme advocacy and morbidity control strategies. Thus, although our knowledge of filariasis-related morbidity and its treatment has expanded in recent years, much work remains to be done to address the needs of more than 40 million persons who suffer worldwide from these conditions.

全球消除淋巴丝虫病方案的发病率管理:科学文献综述。
消除淋巴丝虫病全球方案有两个主要目标:阻断寄生虫的传播,并为那些遭受该疾病毁灭性临床表现的人提供护理(发病率控制)。后一个目标解决了三种与丝虫病相关的情况:急性炎症发作;淋巴水肿;和鞘膜积液。过去十年的研究证实了细菌作为丝虫病流行地区急性炎症发作的原因的重要性,即急性皮肤淋巴管炎(ADLA)。目前的淋巴水肿管理策略是基于ADLA作为淋巴水肿进展触发因素的核心作用。使用简单的干预包可以显著降低ADLA率,降低真皮和真皮下慢性炎症细胞的患病率,提高生活质量。在过去的十年里,在丝虫病流行地区,ADLA和淋巴水肿的社会经济影响越来越受到关注。关于如何最好地优化、扩大、监测和评估淋巴水肿管理计划,许多操作研究问题仍有待回答。在GPELF针对的临床表现中,鞘膜积液是最不受关注的焦点。缺乏关于丝虫病流行地区鞘膜积液手术的有效性和并发症以及术后鞘膜积液复发风险的基本信息。关于大规模服用抗丝虫药物对丝虫病发病率影响的数据不一致。几项研究报告称,大规模给药后急性炎症发作、淋巴水肿和/或鞘膜积液减少,但其他研究报告没有这种关联。评估抗丝虫药物大规模治疗对公共卫生的影响对于方案宣传和发病率控制战略很重要。因此,尽管近年来我们对与丝虫病有关的发病率及其治疗的了解有所扩大,但仍有许多工作要做,以满足全世界4000多万患有这种疾病的人的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信