Management of lithium toxicity.

W Stephen Waring
{"title":"Management of lithium toxicity.","authors":"W Stephen Waring","doi":"10.2165/00139709-200625040-00003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lithium salts have been used in the prophylaxis and treatment of depression and bipolar disorder for >50 years. Lithium has a narrow therapeutic range, and several well characterised adverse effects limit the potential usefulness of higher doses. Acute ingestion in lithium-naive patients is generally associated with only short-lived exposure to high concentrations, due to extensive distribution of lithium throughout the total body water compartment. Conversely, chronic toxicity and acute-on-therapeutic ingestion are associated with prolonged exposure to higher tissue concentrations and, therefore, greater toxicity. Lithium toxicity may be life threatening, or result in persistent cognitive and neurological impairment. Therefore, enhanced lithium clearance has been explored as a means of minimising exposure to high tissue concentrations. Although haemodialysis is highly effective in removing circulating lithium, serum concentrations often rebound so repeated or prolonged treatment may be required. Continuous arteriovenous haemodiafiltration and continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration increase lithium clearance, albeit to a lesser extent than haemodialysis, and are more widely accessible. Haemodiafiltration sustained for >16 hours allows effective removal of total body lithium, thereby avoiding rebound effects. Enhanced elimination should be considered in patients at greatest risk of severe poisoning: namely those with chronic or acute-on-therapeutic toxicity, those with clinically significant features, and those with chronic toxicity whose serum lithium concentration is >2.5 mmol/L. The choice between haemodialysis and continuous haemodiafiltration techniques will depend on local accessibility and urgency of enhancing lithium elimination. Further research is required to establish the potential benefits of assisted elimination on clinical outcome in patients with lithium poisoning.</p>","PeriodicalId":87031,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological reviews","volume":"25 4","pages":"221-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00139709-200625040-00003","citationCount":"73","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00139709-200625040-00003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 73

Abstract

Lithium salts have been used in the prophylaxis and treatment of depression and bipolar disorder for >50 years. Lithium has a narrow therapeutic range, and several well characterised adverse effects limit the potential usefulness of higher doses. Acute ingestion in lithium-naive patients is generally associated with only short-lived exposure to high concentrations, due to extensive distribution of lithium throughout the total body water compartment. Conversely, chronic toxicity and acute-on-therapeutic ingestion are associated with prolonged exposure to higher tissue concentrations and, therefore, greater toxicity. Lithium toxicity may be life threatening, or result in persistent cognitive and neurological impairment. Therefore, enhanced lithium clearance has been explored as a means of minimising exposure to high tissue concentrations. Although haemodialysis is highly effective in removing circulating lithium, serum concentrations often rebound so repeated or prolonged treatment may be required. Continuous arteriovenous haemodiafiltration and continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration increase lithium clearance, albeit to a lesser extent than haemodialysis, and are more widely accessible. Haemodiafiltration sustained for >16 hours allows effective removal of total body lithium, thereby avoiding rebound effects. Enhanced elimination should be considered in patients at greatest risk of severe poisoning: namely those with chronic or acute-on-therapeutic toxicity, those with clinically significant features, and those with chronic toxicity whose serum lithium concentration is >2.5 mmol/L. The choice between haemodialysis and continuous haemodiafiltration techniques will depend on local accessibility and urgency of enhancing lithium elimination. Further research is required to establish the potential benefits of assisted elimination on clinical outcome in patients with lithium poisoning.

锂中毒的处理。
锂盐用于抑郁症和双相情感障碍的预防和治疗已有50多年的历史。锂的治疗范围很窄,而且一些明显的副作用限制了高剂量的潜在效用。由于锂在全身水室的广泛分布,锂首次急性摄入患者通常只与短暂的高浓度暴露有关。相反,慢性毒性和急性治疗期摄入与长期暴露于较高的组织浓度有关,因此毒性更大。锂中毒可能危及生命,或导致持续的认知和神经损伤。因此,已经探索了增强锂清除作为最大限度地减少高组织浓度暴露的手段。虽然血液透析在去除循环锂方面非常有效,但血清浓度经常反弹,因此可能需要重复或延长治疗。持续的动静脉血液滤过和持续的静脉静脉血液滤过增加了锂离子的清除率,尽管其程度低于血液透析,但更容易获得。血液滤过持续>16小时,可有效去除全身锂,从而避免反弹效应。严重中毒风险最大的患者应考虑加强消除:即慢性或急性治疗毒性患者,具有临床显著特征的患者,血清锂浓度>2.5 mmol/L的慢性毒性患者。血液透析和持续血液渗滤技术之间的选择将取决于当地的可及性和加强锂消除的紧迫性。需要进一步的研究来确定辅助消除对锂中毒患者临床结果的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信