Pharmacokinetic investigation of dose proportionality with a 24-hour controlled-release formulation of hydromorphone.

Gayatri Sathyan, Emily Xu, John Thipphawong, Suneel K Gupta
{"title":"Pharmacokinetic investigation of dose proportionality with a 24-hour controlled-release formulation of hydromorphone.","authors":"Gayatri Sathyan,&nbsp;Emily Xu,&nbsp;John Thipphawong,&nbsp;Suneel K Gupta","doi":"10.1186/1472-6904-7-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was investigate the dose proportionality of a novel, once-daily, controlled-release formulation of hydromorphone that utilizes the OROS Push-Pull osmotic pump technology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In an open-label, four-way, crossover study, 32 healthy volunteers were randomized to receive a single dose of OROS hydromorphone 8, 16, 32, and 64 mg, with a 7-day washout period between treatments. Opioid antagonism was provided by three or four doses of naltrexone 50 mg, given at 12-hour intervals pre- and post-OROS hydromorphone dosing. Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected pre-dose and at regular intervals up to 48 hours post-dose (72 hours for the 64-mg dose), and were assayed for hydromorphone concentration to determine peak plasma concentration (Cmax), time at which peak plasma concentration was observed (Tmax), terminal half-life (t1/2), and area under the concentration-time curve for zero to time t (AUC0-t) and zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity). An analysis of variance (ANOVA) model on untransformed and dose-normalized data for AUC0-t, AUC0-infinity, and Cmax was used to establish dose linearity and proportionality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study was completed by 31 of 32 subjects. Median Tmax (12.0-16.0 hours) and mean t1/2 (10.6-11.0 hours) were found to be independent of dose. Regression analyses of Cmax, AUC0-48, and AUC0-infinity by dose indicated that the relationship was linear (slope, P < or = 0.05) and that the intercept did not differ significantly from zero (P > 0.05). Similar analyses with dose-normalized parameters also indicated that the slope did not differ significantly from zero (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pharmacokinetics of OROS hydromorphone are linear and dose proportional for the 8, 16, 32, and 64 mg doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":9196,"journal":{"name":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"7 ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6904-7-3","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-7-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was investigate the dose proportionality of a novel, once-daily, controlled-release formulation of hydromorphone that utilizes the OROS Push-Pull osmotic pump technology.

Methods: In an open-label, four-way, crossover study, 32 healthy volunteers were randomized to receive a single dose of OROS hydromorphone 8, 16, 32, and 64 mg, with a 7-day washout period between treatments. Opioid antagonism was provided by three or four doses of naltrexone 50 mg, given at 12-hour intervals pre- and post-OROS hydromorphone dosing. Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected pre-dose and at regular intervals up to 48 hours post-dose (72 hours for the 64-mg dose), and were assayed for hydromorphone concentration to determine peak plasma concentration (Cmax), time at which peak plasma concentration was observed (Tmax), terminal half-life (t1/2), and area under the concentration-time curve for zero to time t (AUC0-t) and zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity). An analysis of variance (ANOVA) model on untransformed and dose-normalized data for AUC0-t, AUC0-infinity, and Cmax was used to establish dose linearity and proportionality.

Results: The study was completed by 31 of 32 subjects. Median Tmax (12.0-16.0 hours) and mean t1/2 (10.6-11.0 hours) were found to be independent of dose. Regression analyses of Cmax, AUC0-48, and AUC0-infinity by dose indicated that the relationship was linear (slope, P < or = 0.05) and that the intercept did not differ significantly from zero (P > 0.05). Similar analyses with dose-normalized parameters also indicated that the slope did not differ significantly from zero (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The pharmacokinetics of OROS hydromorphone are linear and dose proportional for the 8, 16, 32, and 64 mg doses.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

氢吗啡酮24小时控释制剂剂量比例的药动学研究。
背景:本研究的目的是研究一种利用OROS推拉渗透泵技术的新型、每日一次的氢吗啡酮控释制剂的剂量比例。方法:在一项开放标签、四方向、交叉研究中,32名健康志愿者随机接受单剂量OROS氢吗啡酮8、16、32和64 mg,两次治疗之间有7天的洗脱期。阿片类药物拮抗剂是三剂或四剂纳曲酮50mg,在oros前后每隔12小时给药。在给药前和给药后48小时(64mg给药后72小时)内定期收集血浆样品进行药代动力学分析,测定氢吗啡酮浓度,测定血药浓度峰(Cmax)、血药浓度峰出现时间(Tmax)、终末半衰期(t1/2)以及0-t时间(AUC0-t)和0-∞时间(auc0 -∞)的浓度-时间曲线下面积。使用未转换和剂量归一化数据的方差分析(ANOVA)模型对AUC0-t、AUC0-infinity和Cmax建立剂量线性和比例关系。结果:32名受试者中有31人完成研究。中位Tmax(12.0 ~ 16.0小时)和平均t1/2(10.6 ~ 11.0小时)与剂量无关。根据剂量对Cmax、AUC0-48和AUC0-infinity进行回归分析,结果表明Cmax、AUC0-48和AUC0-infinity呈线性关系(斜率,P < or = 0.05),截距与0无显著差异(P > 0.05)。采用剂量归一化参数的类似分析也表明,斜率与零无显著差异(P > 0.05)。结论:8、16、32、64 mg剂量下,OROS氢吗啡酮的药动学呈线性关系,且呈剂量正比关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信