"Missing" domestic violence victims in welfare caseloads: the discrepancy between administrative and survey disclosure rates.

Andrea Hetling, Correne Saunders, Catherine E Born
{"title":"\"Missing\" domestic violence victims in welfare caseloads: the discrepancy between administrative and survey disclosure rates.","authors":"Andrea Hetling,&nbsp;Correne Saunders,&nbsp;Catherine E Born","doi":"10.1300/J045v22n02_05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The large discrepancy between epidemiological evidence and welfare administrative data regarding domestic violence prevalence among welfare recipients is an issue of major concern for social policy. This study sought to determine whether or not the discrepancy is due to under-reporting by all women or by certain types of women. Using survey and administrative data on a sample of June 2002 welfare recipients, characteristics of women whose abuse was known to their welfare caseworkers are compared to those of individuals who disclosed to survey researchers but not to welfare personnel. Statistically significant differences suggest that some subgroups, including African Americans and women with less education, rather than all women, may be less likely to disclose abuse to welfare caseworkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":73764,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health & social policy","volume":"22 2","pages":"79-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J045v22n02_05","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health & social policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J045v22n02_05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The large discrepancy between epidemiological evidence and welfare administrative data regarding domestic violence prevalence among welfare recipients is an issue of major concern for social policy. This study sought to determine whether or not the discrepancy is due to under-reporting by all women or by certain types of women. Using survey and administrative data on a sample of June 2002 welfare recipients, characteristics of women whose abuse was known to their welfare caseworkers are compared to those of individuals who disclosed to survey researchers but not to welfare personnel. Statistically significant differences suggest that some subgroups, including African Americans and women with less education, rather than all women, may be less likely to disclose abuse to welfare caseworkers.

福利案件中“失踪”的家暴受害者:行政与调查披露率的差异。
流行病学证据与福利行政数据之间关于福利受惠者家庭暴力普遍程度的巨大差异是社会政策主要关注的一个问题。这项研究试图确定这种差异是由于所有女性或某些类型的女性的报告不足造成的。利用对2002年6月福利受助人样本的调查和管理数据,将福利工作者知道受虐待的妇女的特征与向调查研究人员披露但未向福利人员披露的妇女的特征进行了比较。统计上的显著差异表明,一些亚群体,包括非裔美国人和受教育程度较低的妇女,而不是所有妇女,可能不太可能向福利工作者披露虐待情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信