Institutional and community-based long-term care: a comparative estimate of public costs.

Martin Kitchener, Terence Ng, Nancy Miller, Charlene Harrington
{"title":"Institutional and community-based long-term care: a comparative estimate of public costs.","authors":"Martin Kitchener,&nbsp;Terence Ng,&nbsp;Nancy Miller,&nbsp;Charlene Harrington","doi":"10.1300/J045v22n02_03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As long-term care policy makers struggle with competing challenges including state budget deficits and pressures to expand homeand community-based services (HCBS), there is a pressing need for information on the comparative cost of Medicaid HCBS and institutional care. This paper uses the most recent available data (2002) to present three per participant expenditure comparisons between Medicaid HCBS waivers (which require that participants have an institutional level of care need) and institutional care: (1) program expenditure (waivers vs. the comparable level of institutional provision); (2) total Medicaid expenditure (program plus other Medicaid expenditure); and (3) estimated total public expenditure (Medicaid expenditures plus state and federal supplemental- income payments). This analysis estimates that when compared with Medicaid institutional care in 2002, HCBS waivers produced a national average public expenditure saving of $43,947 per participant. doi:10.1300/J045v22n02_03.</p>","PeriodicalId":73764,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health & social policy","volume":"22 2","pages":"31-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J045v22n02_03","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health & social policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J045v22n02_03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

As long-term care policy makers struggle with competing challenges including state budget deficits and pressures to expand homeand community-based services (HCBS), there is a pressing need for information on the comparative cost of Medicaid HCBS and institutional care. This paper uses the most recent available data (2002) to present three per participant expenditure comparisons between Medicaid HCBS waivers (which require that participants have an institutional level of care need) and institutional care: (1) program expenditure (waivers vs. the comparable level of institutional provision); (2) total Medicaid expenditure (program plus other Medicaid expenditure); and (3) estimated total public expenditure (Medicaid expenditures plus state and federal supplemental- income payments). This analysis estimates that when compared with Medicaid institutional care in 2002, HCBS waivers produced a national average public expenditure saving of $43,947 per participant. doi:10.1300/J045v22n02_03.

机构和社区长期护理:公共成本的比较估计。
由于长期护理政策制定者正在努力应对包括国家预算赤字和扩大家庭和社区服务(HCBS)的压力在内的竞争挑战,迫切需要关于医疗补助HCBS和机构护理的比较成本的信息。本文使用最新的可用数据(2002年)对医疗补助HCBS豁免(要求参与者具有机构级别的护理需求)和机构护理之间的每个参与者支出进行了三次比较:(1)计划支出(豁免与可比机构提供水平);(2)医疗补助总支出(项目加上其他医疗补助支出);(3)估计的公共支出总额(医疗补助支出加上州和联邦的补充收入支付)。该分析估计,与2002年的医疗补助制度相比,HCBS的豁免使每个参与者平均节省了43,947美元的公共支出。doi: 10.1300 / J045v22n02_03。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信