Training for terrorism-related conditions in hospitals: United States, 2003-04.

Advance data Pub Date : 2006-12-11
Richard W Niska, Catharine W Burt
{"title":"Training for terrorism-related conditions in hospitals: United States, 2003-04.","authors":"Richard W Niska,&nbsp;Catharine W Burt","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study estimates baseline data to determine which hospital characteristics are associated with providing terrorism preparedness training to clinical staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Information from a Bioterrorism and Mass Casualty Supplement to the 2003 and 2004 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys was used to provide national estimates of variations in terrorism preparedness training by eight hospital characteristics. Of 874 hospitals in scope, 739 (84.6 percent) responded. Estimates are presented with 95 percent confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hospitals with Joint Commission accreditation were more likely to provide terrorism preparedness training to all types of clinical staff (staff physicians, residents, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and laboratory staff). Teaching hospitals, medical school affiliation, bed capacity, and urban location were also associated with training staff physicians, residents, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. Hospitals with residency programs were associated with training only staff physicians and residents. There was more parity across hospital characteristics in training nurses and laboratory staff than for physicians, residents, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. Joint Commission accreditation was the most consistent factor associated with providing training for all nine exposures studied (smallpox, anthrax, chemical and radiological exposures, botulism, plague, tularemia, viral encephalitis, and hemorrhagic fever).</p>","PeriodicalId":79552,"journal":{"name":"Advance data","volume":" 380","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advance data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study estimates baseline data to determine which hospital characteristics are associated with providing terrorism preparedness training to clinical staff.

Methods: Information from a Bioterrorism and Mass Casualty Supplement to the 2003 and 2004 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys was used to provide national estimates of variations in terrorism preparedness training by eight hospital characteristics. Of 874 hospitals in scope, 739 (84.6 percent) responded. Estimates are presented with 95 percent confidence intervals.

Results: Hospitals with Joint Commission accreditation were more likely to provide terrorism preparedness training to all types of clinical staff (staff physicians, residents, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and laboratory staff). Teaching hospitals, medical school affiliation, bed capacity, and urban location were also associated with training staff physicians, residents, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. Hospitals with residency programs were associated with training only staff physicians and residents. There was more parity across hospital characteristics in training nurses and laboratory staff than for physicians, residents, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. Joint Commission accreditation was the most consistent factor associated with providing training for all nine exposures studied (smallpox, anthrax, chemical and radiological exposures, botulism, plague, tularemia, viral encephalitis, and hemorrhagic fever).

针对医院与恐怖主义有关的情况进行培训:美国,2003- 2004年。
目的:本研究估计基线数据,以确定哪些医院特征与向临床工作人员提供恐怖主义防备培训有关。方法:利用2003年和2004年全国医院门诊医疗调查的生物恐怖主义和大规模伤亡补充资料中的信息,根据8个医院的特点提供全国对恐怖主义防备培训变化的估计。在调查范围内的874家医院中,有739家(84.6%)做出了回应。估计以95%的置信区间表示。结果:获得联合委员会认证的医院更有可能为所有类型的临床工作人员(工作医师、住院医师、执业护士、医师助理和实验室工作人员)提供防范恐怖主义的培训。教学医院、医学院隶属关系、床位容量和城市位置也与培训工作人员医生、住院医生、执业护士和医师助理有关。有住院医师培训计划的医院只培训工作人员医师和住院医师。在培训护士和实验室工作人员方面,医院的特点比医生、住院医生、执业护士和医师助理更平等。联合委员会的认可是为所研究的所有九种接触(天花、炭疽、化学和放射接触、肉毒杆菌中毒、鼠疫、土拉菌病、病毒性脑炎和出血热)提供培训的最一致因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信