Comparisons of annotation predictions for affymetrix GeneChips.

Maria Stalteri, Andrew Harrison
{"title":"Comparisons of annotation predictions for affymetrix GeneChips.","authors":"Maria Stalteri,&nbsp;Andrew Harrison","doi":"10.2165/00822942-200605040-00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have compared Affymetrix and Bioconductor annotations for the MOE430A (mouse) GeneChip array. The mappings of probe sets to LocusLink identifiers (LocusIDs) were found to be dynamic, with many changes between successive releases of annotation for both Affymetrix and Bioconductor. There are 49 probe sets that are assigned to one LocusID by Affymetrix and to a different LocusID by Bioconductor from mid-2004 onwards. For virtually all of these examples, the Affymetrix annotation was found to be the one that is in agreement with the current gene prediction. Reference sequence (RefSeq) identifiers are considered to be the gold standard of annotations. However, we could not use these identifiers to discriminate between the accuracy of Bioconductor and Affymetrix because not all of the probes map to the RefSeq transcript to which the probe set is assigned. Moreover, in some cases, probes align to regions downstream of the 3' end of a RefSeq transcript. Adjacent genes were found to be a major cause of discrepancies between the Bioconductor and Affymetrix assignments. Case studies of several probe sets indicated that incorrect assignments are caused by the UniGene cluster assignments of expressed sequence tags representing the probe sets, and by errors in GenBank sequences. Our results indicate that there are a number of errors remaining in the annotation sources used by the microarray community.</p>","PeriodicalId":87049,"journal":{"name":"Applied bioinformatics","volume":"5 4","pages":"237-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00822942-200605040-00006","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00822942-200605040-00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

We have compared Affymetrix and Bioconductor annotations for the MOE430A (mouse) GeneChip array. The mappings of probe sets to LocusLink identifiers (LocusIDs) were found to be dynamic, with many changes between successive releases of annotation for both Affymetrix and Bioconductor. There are 49 probe sets that are assigned to one LocusID by Affymetrix and to a different LocusID by Bioconductor from mid-2004 onwards. For virtually all of these examples, the Affymetrix annotation was found to be the one that is in agreement with the current gene prediction. Reference sequence (RefSeq) identifiers are considered to be the gold standard of annotations. However, we could not use these identifiers to discriminate between the accuracy of Bioconductor and Affymetrix because not all of the probes map to the RefSeq transcript to which the probe set is assigned. Moreover, in some cases, probes align to regions downstream of the 3' end of a RefSeq transcript. Adjacent genes were found to be a major cause of discrepancies between the Bioconductor and Affymetrix assignments. Case studies of several probe sets indicated that incorrect assignments are caused by the UniGene cluster assignments of expressed sequence tags representing the probe sets, and by errors in GenBank sequences. Our results indicate that there are a number of errors remaining in the annotation sources used by the microarray community.

affymetrix基因芯片注释预测的比较。
我们比较了MOE430A(小鼠)基因芯片阵列的Affymetrix和Bioconductor注释。探测集到LocusLink标识符(locusid)的映射被发现是动态的,在Affymetrix和Bioconductor的注释的连续版本之间有许多变化。从2004年中期开始,Affymetrix将49个探针集分配给一个LocusID,而Bioconductor将它们分配给另一个LocusID。对于几乎所有这些例子,Affymetrix注释被发现是与当前基因预测一致的。引用序列(RefSeq)标识符被认为是注释的黄金标准。然而,我们不能使用这些标识符来区分Bioconductor和Affymetrix的准确性,因为不是所有的探针都映射到指定探针集的RefSeq转录本。此外,在某些情况下,探针对准RefSeq转录物3'端的下游区域。邻近基因被发现是导致Bioconductor和Affymetrix分配差异的主要原因。几个探针集的案例研究表明,错误的分配是由代表探针集的表达序列标签的UniGene簇分配引起的,以及由GenBank序列错误引起的。我们的结果表明,微阵列社区使用的注释源中仍存在许多错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信