Interdisciplinary pain therapy: an innovative therapeutic but pre-DRG Economical Center of Medical Excellence.

M H Deininger, T Wolter, A Weyerbrock, A Greulich, A J Goldschmidt
{"title":"Interdisciplinary pain therapy: an innovative therapeutic but pre-DRG Economical Center of Medical Excellence.","authors":"M H Deininger,&nbsp;T Wolter,&nbsp;A Weyerbrock,&nbsp;A Greulich,&nbsp;A J Goldschmidt","doi":"10.1055/s-2006-933407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>After the implementation of the G-DRG system in Germany, doubts arose whether and how interdisciplinary pain therapy centers should be restructured to remain profitable and maintain medical excellence for patients with a long ordeal of malaise.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To reveal structural deficits, we performed a detailed economic analysis of all patients treated at an interdisciplinary pain therapy center of a German University hospital in 2004.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3,672 patients were treated: 2,163 outpatients, 753 at the daycare clinic, 619 as consults and 132 inpatients. The costs for personnel were euro 736,645, consumables euro 105,061, and infrastructure euro 277,762. We calculated fixed costs of euro 236, and consumables of euro 24 per patient. The costs for surgery were euro 1,595, and for a neuroradiological examination euro 245 per patient. Overall treatment costs were euro 319 per patient. We calculated an overall loss of euro 476,752 or euro 109.19 per patient. Outpatients caused a total loss of euro 456,665.83 or euro 211 per patient, consults a total loss of euro 161 683.16 or euro 261.20 per patient, daycare patients a slight profit of euro 30,370 or euro 40 per patient and inpatients a total profit of euro 111,225 or euro 135 per day.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Managerial optimization can yield considerable cost reductions in the G-DRG coding system, without any change in treatment strategies, selection of profitable patients or dismissal of personnel. Inversely, additional personnel are needed to accomplish the implementation process. Board certification was unveiled to constitute the key structural implementation that ensures the economic survival of the department and continuing medical excellence for the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50708,"journal":{"name":"Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie","volume":"67 2","pages":"67-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2006-933407","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-933407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: After the implementation of the G-DRG system in Germany, doubts arose whether and how interdisciplinary pain therapy centers should be restructured to remain profitable and maintain medical excellence for patients with a long ordeal of malaise.

Methods: To reveal structural deficits, we performed a detailed economic analysis of all patients treated at an interdisciplinary pain therapy center of a German University hospital in 2004.

Results: 3,672 patients were treated: 2,163 outpatients, 753 at the daycare clinic, 619 as consults and 132 inpatients. The costs for personnel were euro 736,645, consumables euro 105,061, and infrastructure euro 277,762. We calculated fixed costs of euro 236, and consumables of euro 24 per patient. The costs for surgery were euro 1,595, and for a neuroradiological examination euro 245 per patient. Overall treatment costs were euro 319 per patient. We calculated an overall loss of euro 476,752 or euro 109.19 per patient. Outpatients caused a total loss of euro 456,665.83 or euro 211 per patient, consults a total loss of euro 161 683.16 or euro 261.20 per patient, daycare patients a slight profit of euro 30,370 or euro 40 per patient and inpatients a total profit of euro 111,225 or euro 135 per day.

Conclusion: Managerial optimization can yield considerable cost reductions in the G-DRG coding system, without any change in treatment strategies, selection of profitable patients or dismissal of personnel. Inversely, additional personnel are needed to accomplish the implementation process. Board certification was unveiled to constitute the key structural implementation that ensures the economic survival of the department and continuing medical excellence for the patients.

跨学科的疼痛治疗:一个创新的治疗,但pre-DRG经济中心医学卓越。
目的:在德国实施G-DRG系统后,跨学科疼痛治疗中心是否以及如何重组以保持盈利并保持对长期病痛患者的医疗卓越性产生了疑问。方法:为了揭示结构性缺陷,我们对2004年在一家德国大学医院的跨学科疼痛治疗中心接受治疗的所有患者进行了详细的经济分析。结果:共治疗3672例患者,其中门诊2163例,日托753例,会诊619例,住院132例。人员成本为736,645欧元,消耗品成本为105,061欧元,基础设施成本为277,762欧元。我们计算的固定成本为236欧元,消耗品为24欧元。手术费用为1595欧元,神经放射学检查费用为245欧元。总体治疗费用为每位患者319欧元。我们计算出每位患者的总损失为476,752欧元或109.19欧元。门诊病人的总损失为456,665.83欧元,即每名病人211欧元;咨询病人的总损失为161 683.16欧元,即每名病人261.20欧元;日托病人的总利润为30,370欧元,即每名病人40欧元;住院病人的总利润为111,225欧元,即每天135欧元。结论:管理优化可以在不改变治疗策略、选择有利可图的患者或解雇人员的情况下,显著降低G-DRG编码系统的成本。相反,需要更多的人员来完成执行过程。委员会的认证是确保该部门经济生存和继续为患者提供卓越医疗服务的关键结构实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie
Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie 医学-神经科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信