{"title":"Behind the slow enrollment growth of employer-based consumer-directed health plans.","authors":"Jon Gobel, Jeremy Pickreign, Heidi Whitmore","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the buzz about empowering consumers and controlling rising health costs, consumer-directed health plans (CDHPs)--defined as high-deductible plans coupled with savings accounts--have barely gained a toehold among Americans with employer-sponsored insurance, according to a new national study by the Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC). CDHP proponents often assert the plans offer employees greater choice and autonomy in the health care marketplace, but 39 percent of the estimated 2.7 million workers enrolled in employer-sponsored CDHPs had no choice of another type of health plan in 2006. Moreover, among workers with a choice of plans, relatively few (19%) choose CDHPs when offered another type of plan option, such as preferred provider organizations (PPOs) or health maintenance organizations (HMO). Comparable take-up rates for PPO and HMO plans when employees have a choice of another plan type were 55 percent and 40 percent, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":80012,"journal":{"name":"Issue brief (Center for Studying Health System Change)","volume":" 107","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issue brief (Center for Studying Health System Change)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite the buzz about empowering consumers and controlling rising health costs, consumer-directed health plans (CDHPs)--defined as high-deductible plans coupled with savings accounts--have barely gained a toehold among Americans with employer-sponsored insurance, according to a new national study by the Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC). CDHP proponents often assert the plans offer employees greater choice and autonomy in the health care marketplace, but 39 percent of the estimated 2.7 million workers enrolled in employer-sponsored CDHPs had no choice of another type of health plan in 2006. Moreover, among workers with a choice of plans, relatively few (19%) choose CDHPs when offered another type of plan option, such as preferred provider organizations (PPOs) or health maintenance organizations (HMO). Comparable take-up rates for PPO and HMO plans when employees have a choice of another plan type were 55 percent and 40 percent, respectively.
美国医疗体系改革研究中心(Center for study health System Change,简称HSC)的一项最新全国性研究显示,尽管有关赋予消费者权力和控制不断上涨的医疗成本的说法不绝于声,但消费者导向的医疗计划(CDHPs)——定义为高免赔额计划与储蓄账户相结合——在雇主赞助的美国人中几乎没有获得立足点。CDHP的支持者经常声称,该计划为雇员在医疗保健市场上提供了更多的选择和自主权,但在2006年,参加雇主赞助的CDHP计划的约270万工人中,有39%的人没有其他健康计划的选择。此外,在可选择计划的员工中,当提供其他类型的计划选项(如首选提供者组织(PPOs)或健康维护组织(HMO))时,选择cdhp的员工相对较少(19%)。当员工可以选择另一种计划类型时,PPO和HMO计划的可比接受率分别为55%和40%。