Childbirth in modern Athens: the transition from homebirth to hospital birth.

Penn bioethics journal Pub Date : 2006-01-01
Julie Nusbaum
{"title":"Childbirth in modern Athens: the transition from homebirth to hospital birth.","authors":"Julie Nusbaum","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The transition of birthing practices in Greece from a homebirth culture, in which women deliver at home surrounded by family and under the supervision of a typically female birth attendant, to a biomedical birth model, in which women deliver in a hospital with numerous forms of medical intervention and under the control of a physician, has been unusually rapid. Today, Western biomedicine not only dominates the health care system in Greece but has an essential hegemony on women's health care. My research examines whether the pervasive utilization of biomedical environments for birthing can be explained by a lack of alternatives or by women's satisfaction with the technology and care available in hospitals. I also examine how women retain control over their experience of pregnancy and childbirth within the biomedical context and attempt to explain the emerging construction of a \"natural\" discourse on pregnancy and childbirth in Athens. Major themes that emerged from interviews with Athenian women were the lack of consent for medical intervention during birth, limited infrastructure to support women who seek non-medical alternatives, and limited emotional support and collective education for mothers in the urban environment of Athens. Also, women described choosing the right caregiver as essential to maintaining a sense of control over their pregnancy and, more generally, over their life. In light of women's apparent interest in improving women's experience of pregnancy and childbirth in Athens, it is recommended that researchers further explore the interaction of medical and non-medical discourses on pregnancy and childbirth.</p>","PeriodicalId":87452,"journal":{"name":"Penn bioethics journal","volume":"2 2","pages":"33-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Penn bioethics journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transition of birthing practices in Greece from a homebirth culture, in which women deliver at home surrounded by family and under the supervision of a typically female birth attendant, to a biomedical birth model, in which women deliver in a hospital with numerous forms of medical intervention and under the control of a physician, has been unusually rapid. Today, Western biomedicine not only dominates the health care system in Greece but has an essential hegemony on women's health care. My research examines whether the pervasive utilization of biomedical environments for birthing can be explained by a lack of alternatives or by women's satisfaction with the technology and care available in hospitals. I also examine how women retain control over their experience of pregnancy and childbirth within the biomedical context and attempt to explain the emerging construction of a "natural" discourse on pregnancy and childbirth in Athens. Major themes that emerged from interviews with Athenian women were the lack of consent for medical intervention during birth, limited infrastructure to support women who seek non-medical alternatives, and limited emotional support and collective education for mothers in the urban environment of Athens. Also, women described choosing the right caregiver as essential to maintaining a sense of control over their pregnancy and, more generally, over their life. In light of women's apparent interest in improving women's experience of pregnancy and childbirth in Athens, it is recommended that researchers further explore the interaction of medical and non-medical discourses on pregnancy and childbirth.

现代雅典的分娩:从家庭分娩到医院分娩的过渡。
希腊的分娩方式从在家分娩文化(妇女在家人的陪伴下在一名典型的女接生员的监督下在家中分娩)转变为生物医学分娩模式(妇女在医院进行多种形式的医疗干预并在医生的控制下分娩),其转变速度异常迅速。今天,西方生物医学不仅在希腊的医疗保健体系中占据主导地位,而且对妇女的医疗保健也有着本质上的霸权。我的研究考察了生物医学环境的普遍使用是否可以用缺乏替代方案或妇女对医院现有技术和护理的满意度来解释。我还研究了女性如何在生物医学背景下保持对怀孕和分娩经历的控制,并试图解释雅典关于怀孕和分娩的“自然”话语的新兴结构。从对雅典妇女的采访中得出的主要主题是,在分娩过程中缺乏对医疗干预的同意,支持寻求非医疗替代方案的妇女的基础设施有限,以及在雅典的城市环境中,对母亲的情感支持和集体教育有限。此外,女性表示,选择合适的照顾者对于保持对怀孕的控制感至关重要,更广泛地说,对她们的生活至关重要。鉴于妇女对改善雅典妇女怀孕和分娩经验的明显兴趣,建议研究人员进一步探索关于怀孕和分娩的医学和非医学话语的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书