Is it Appropriate to Use Core Clerkship Grades in the Selection of Residents?

Hiroo Takayama MD , Rebecca Grinsell MD , Douglas Brock PhD , Hugh Foy MD , Carlos Pellegrini MD , Karen Horvath MD
{"title":"Is it Appropriate to Use Core Clerkship Grades in the Selection of Residents?","authors":"Hiroo Takayama MD ,&nbsp;Rebecca Grinsell MD ,&nbsp;Douglas Brock PhD ,&nbsp;Hugh Foy MD ,&nbsp;Carlos Pellegrini MD ,&nbsp;Karen Horvath MD","doi":"10.1016/j.cursur.2006.06.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study challenges the appropriateness of using core clerkship grades for resident selection. The authors hypothesize that substantial variability occurred in the system of grading.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>In this retrospective cross-sectional study, variability in the grading systems for third-year core clinical clerkships were examined. From the Medical Student Performance Evaluation of applicants from U.S. medical schools for residency training in the authors’ department in 2004 and 2005, the authors gathered the following variables: medical school, third-year core clerkship grading systems, and percentage of students in each grade category. Descriptive analyses were conducted and within institution variability across clerkship scores was analyzed using repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t-test.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>University teaching hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>The survey covered 121 of 122 U.S. medical schools accredited by the AAMC/LCME.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Grading systems used included: variations of Honors/Pass/Fail (H,P,F) system in 76 schools, letter grade systems in 22 schools, and other variants (eg, Outstanding, Advanced, and Proficient in 6 schools and Pass/Fail in 4 schools). Thirteen schools (10%) provided either no grading system or no interpretable system. Grading systems included were further defined into 2 scores in 6 schools, 3 in 34 schools, 4 in 38 schools, 5 in 23 schools, and more than 6 in 6 schools. For schools using a grading system containing 3 or more scores, the percentage of students given the highest grade was significantly less in Surgery (28%) compared with Family Medicine (34%) and Psychiatry (35%) (p = 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Core clerkship grading systems and the percentage to which institutions grade students as having achieved the highest performance level vary greatly among U.S. medical schools. Within institutions, significant variability exists among clerkships in the percentage of the highest grade given, which makes interpersonal comparison based on core clerkship grades difficult and suggests that this method may not be a reliable indicator of performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75762,"journal":{"name":"Current surgery","volume":"63 6","pages":"Pages 391-396"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cursur.2006.06.012","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149794406001164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

Objective

This study challenges the appropriateness of using core clerkship grades for resident selection. The authors hypothesize that substantial variability occurred in the system of grading.

Design

In this retrospective cross-sectional study, variability in the grading systems for third-year core clinical clerkships were examined. From the Medical Student Performance Evaluation of applicants from U.S. medical schools for residency training in the authors’ department in 2004 and 2005, the authors gathered the following variables: medical school, third-year core clerkship grading systems, and percentage of students in each grade category. Descriptive analyses were conducted and within institution variability across clerkship scores was analyzed using repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t-test.

Setting

University teaching hospital.

Participants

The survey covered 121 of 122 U.S. medical schools accredited by the AAMC/LCME.

Results

Grading systems used included: variations of Honors/Pass/Fail (H,P,F) system in 76 schools, letter grade systems in 22 schools, and other variants (eg, Outstanding, Advanced, and Proficient in 6 schools and Pass/Fail in 4 schools). Thirteen schools (10%) provided either no grading system or no interpretable system. Grading systems included were further defined into 2 scores in 6 schools, 3 in 34 schools, 4 in 38 schools, 5 in 23 schools, and more than 6 in 6 schools. For schools using a grading system containing 3 or more scores, the percentage of students given the highest grade was significantly less in Surgery (28%) compared with Family Medicine (34%) and Psychiatry (35%) (p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Core clerkship grading systems and the percentage to which institutions grade students as having achieved the highest performance level vary greatly among U.S. medical schools. Within institutions, significant variability exists among clerkships in the percentage of the highest grade given, which makes interpersonal comparison based on core clerkship grades difficult and suggests that this method may not be a reliable indicator of performance.

以核心见习职系遴选住院医师是否合适?
目的本研究质疑了在住院医师选择中使用核心见习成绩的适当性。作者假设在评分系统中发生了实质性的变化。设计:在这项回顾性横断面研究中,研究了三年级核心临床实习生评分系统的可变性。从2004年和2005年美国医学院住院医师培训申请人的医学生表现评估中,作者收集了以下变量:医学院,三年级核心见习评分系统,以及每个年级类别的学生百分比。进行了描述性分析,并使用重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)和t检验分析了机构内员工分数的可变性。大学教学医院。该调查涵盖了美国医学院协会认证的122所美国医学院中的121所。使用的评分系统包括:76所学校的荣誉/及格/不及格(H,P,F)系统的变化,22所学校的字母等级系统,以及其他变体(例如,6所学校的优秀,先进和精通,4所学校的及格/不及格)。13所学校(10%)没有评分制度或没有可解释的评分制度。包括的等级制度进一步定义为6所学校2分、34所学校3分、38所学校4分、23所学校5分、6所学校6分以上。对于使用包含3分或更多分数的评分系统的学校,与家庭医学(34%)和精神病学(35%)相比,获得最高分的学生比例明显低于外科(28%)(p = 0.001)。结论美国医学院的score实习评分制度和各机构对学生达到最高绩效水平的评分比例差异很大。在机构内部,不同的职员在给予最高分数的百分比上存在显著的差异,这使得基于核心职员分数的人际比较变得困难,并表明这种方法可能不是一个可靠的绩效指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信