Does Academic Intervention Impact ABS Qualifying Examination Results?

Karen R. Borman MD
{"title":"Does Academic Intervention Impact ABS Qualifying Examination Results?","authors":"Karen R. Borman MD","doi":"10.1016/j.cursur.2006.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the impact of a focused academic support program on American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) scores and Qualifying Examination (QE) outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A mandatory intervention program was begun in April 2001 for residents with ABSITE Total Test (TT) percentiles &lt;31. Program elements included: 1) individual faculty mentoring and personal learning plan 2) QE videotape review sessions 3) Surgical Education and Self-Assessment Program (SESAP) 4) monthly rotation evaluations, and 5) quarterly status feedback. A free medical evaluation was offered. Mock orals participation, educational psychologist consultation, and voluntary followup mentoring were added later. Study data were reviewed for 2003-2005 Chief Residents including ABSITE scores, QE results, conference attendance, rotation Overall Performance ratings, and resident surgeon case volumes. Results were compared for the academic intervention (AI) and no intervention (NI) groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fifteen residents graduated during the study period. Eight residents completed nine interventions; seven returned to TT percentiles &gt;30 (7/8, 88%). First post-intervention ABSITE gains were large compared to NI and national peer groups. Standard Score (SS) TT gains were maintained until residency completion by four AI residents. Median AI PGY-5 TT percentile was 32 and three scores were ≤25. Six AI residents (6/8, 75%) and all NI residents (7/7, 100%) passed the QE on their first attempts. AI and NI groups were similar for conference attendance, rotation evaluations, and operative log totals.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A focused academic support intervention for residents with marginal ABSITE TT percentiles can produce immediate substantial gains. Gains are variably maintained through remaining residency years. PGY-5 TT percentiles ≤25, seen with three AI residents (3/8, 38%), are associated with a 40% first QE failure rate. Therefore, our 75% QE first-time pass rate for AI residents argues for intervention success.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75762,"journal":{"name":"Current surgery","volume":"63 6","pages":"Pages 367-372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cursur.2006.06.007","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149794406000870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the impact of a focused academic support program on American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) scores and Qualifying Examination (QE) outcomes.

Methods

A mandatory intervention program was begun in April 2001 for residents with ABSITE Total Test (TT) percentiles <31. Program elements included: 1) individual faculty mentoring and personal learning plan 2) QE videotape review sessions 3) Surgical Education and Self-Assessment Program (SESAP) 4) monthly rotation evaluations, and 5) quarterly status feedback. A free medical evaluation was offered. Mock orals participation, educational psychologist consultation, and voluntary followup mentoring were added later. Study data were reviewed for 2003-2005 Chief Residents including ABSITE scores, QE results, conference attendance, rotation Overall Performance ratings, and resident surgeon case volumes. Results were compared for the academic intervention (AI) and no intervention (NI) groups.

Results

Fifteen residents graduated during the study period. Eight residents completed nine interventions; seven returned to TT percentiles >30 (7/8, 88%). First post-intervention ABSITE gains were large compared to NI and national peer groups. Standard Score (SS) TT gains were maintained until residency completion by four AI residents. Median AI PGY-5 TT percentile was 32 and three scores were ≤25. Six AI residents (6/8, 75%) and all NI residents (7/7, 100%) passed the QE on their first attempts. AI and NI groups were similar for conference attendance, rotation evaluations, and operative log totals.

Conclusions

A focused academic support intervention for residents with marginal ABSITE TT percentiles can produce immediate substantial gains. Gains are variably maintained through remaining residency years. PGY-5 TT percentiles ≤25, seen with three AI residents (3/8, 38%), are associated with a 40% first QE failure rate. Therefore, our 75% QE first-time pass rate for AI residents argues for intervention success.

学术干预会影响ABS资格考试成绩吗?
目的评估一项重点学术支持计划对美国外科培训考试委员会(ABSITE)分数和资格考试(QE)结果的影响。方法2001年4月开始对ABSITE总测试(TT)百分位数为31的居民实施强制性干预。项目内容包括:1)个别教师指导和个人学习计划;2)QE录像带复习课程;3)外科教育和自我评估计划(SESAP); 4)每月轮换评估;5)季度状态反馈。提供了免费的医疗评估。随后加入了模拟口头参与、教育心理学家咨询和自愿随访指导。回顾了2003-2005年总住院医师的研究数据,包括ABSITE评分、QE结果、会议出席率、轮转总体表现评分和住院外科医生病例量。比较学术干预组(AI)和不干预组(NI)的结果。结果15名住院医师在研究期间毕业。8名居民完成了9项干预;7个恢复到TT百分位数>30(7/ 8,88%)。首先,与NI和全国同行组相比,干预后ABSITE的收益很大。标准得分(SS) TT的收益一直保持到四名AI居民完成住院治疗。AI PGY-5 TT百分位数中位数为32,3个得分≤25。6名AI居民(6/ 8,75%)和所有NI居民(7/ 7,100%)在第一次尝试时通过了QE。AI组和NI组在会议出席率、轮换评估和操作日志总数方面相似。结论针对ABSITE TT百分位数较低的住院医师进行针对性的学术支持干预,可产生立竿见影的效果。在剩余的居住年限中,收益会有不同程度的保持。PGY-5 TT百分位数≤25,在3名AI居民(3/ 8,38 %)中看到,与40%的首次QE失败率相关。因此,我们对人工智能居民75%的量化宽松首次通过率表明干预成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信