When Should We Order a CT Scan and When Should We Rely on the Results to Diagnose an Acute Appendicitis?

Adil Ceydeli MD , Simon Lavotshkin , Jack Yu MD , Leslie Wise MD
{"title":"When Should We Order a CT Scan and When Should We Rely on the Results to Diagnose an Acute Appendicitis?","authors":"Adil Ceydeli MD ,&nbsp;Simon Lavotshkin ,&nbsp;Jack Yu MD ,&nbsp;Leslie Wise MD","doi":"10.1016/j.cursur.2006.06.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this study was to retrospectively analyze the last 100 consecutive emergency appendectomies performed in the authors’ institution, which is a community-based teaching hospital, and look at the accuracy of the CT scan in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective clinical study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>A 600-bed community-based teaching hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The last 100 consecutive emergency appendectomies, which were performed at New York Methodist Hospital in 2004, were retrospectively analyzed. The collected data included the demographics of the patients, relevant history, physical examination, laboratory and radiological tests, and pathology results.</p><p>The statistical analyses were performed using the JMP version 3.2 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina). An alpha value of 0.05 was used in all statistical analyses, and p values were considered as being statistically significant at or below the alpha value of 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no statistically significant correlation between the acute appendicitis and some of the typical presenting symptoms and signs of acute appendicitis (rebound tenderness, low-grade fever, elevated white blood cell count, and anorexia).</p><p>The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the CT scan in this retrospective analysis were 96%, 75%, 98.5%, and 50%, respectively, with an overall efficiency of 95%. However, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the CT scan increased after reevaluation of the false-positive, false-negative, and inconclusive CT results by an experienced radiologist in a blind fashion (97%, 100%, 100%, and 71%, respectively). The correlation between the CT scan and the pathology result was statistically significant when the CT result was positive or negative (p = 0.0001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The CT scan is indicated when the clinical presentation is equivocal, and it will be helpful if the result is positive or interpreted as negative only by an experienced radiology attending.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75762,"journal":{"name":"Current surgery","volume":"63 6","pages":"Pages 464-468"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cursur.2006.06.008","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149794406001152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to retrospectively analyze the last 100 consecutive emergency appendectomies performed in the authors’ institution, which is a community-based teaching hospital, and look at the accuracy of the CT scan in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Design

Retrospective clinical study.

Setting

A 600-bed community-based teaching hospital.

Methods

The last 100 consecutive emergency appendectomies, which were performed at New York Methodist Hospital in 2004, were retrospectively analyzed. The collected data included the demographics of the patients, relevant history, physical examination, laboratory and radiological tests, and pathology results.

The statistical analyses were performed using the JMP version 3.2 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina). An alpha value of 0.05 was used in all statistical analyses, and p values were considered as being statistically significant at or below the alpha value of 0.05.

Results

There was no statistically significant correlation between the acute appendicitis and some of the typical presenting symptoms and signs of acute appendicitis (rebound tenderness, low-grade fever, elevated white blood cell count, and anorexia).

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the CT scan in this retrospective analysis were 96%, 75%, 98.5%, and 50%, respectively, with an overall efficiency of 95%. However, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the CT scan increased after reevaluation of the false-positive, false-negative, and inconclusive CT results by an experienced radiologist in a blind fashion (97%, 100%, 100%, and 71%, respectively). The correlation between the CT scan and the pathology result was statistically significant when the CT result was positive or negative (p = 0.0001).

Conclusion

The CT scan is indicated when the clinical presentation is equivocal, and it will be helpful if the result is positive or interpreted as negative only by an experienced radiology attending.

什么时候我们应该安排CT扫描,什么时候我们应该依靠结果来诊断急性阑尾炎?
目的回顾性分析笔者所在社区教学医院最近连续100例急诊阑尾炎手术,探讨CT扫描诊断急性阑尾炎的准确性。设计回顾性临床研究。设有600张床位的社区教学医院。方法回顾性分析2004年在纽约卫理公会医院连续施行的100例急诊阑尾切除术。收集的资料包括患者的人口统计资料、相关病史、体格检查、实验室和放射检查以及病理结果。采用JMP 3.2版软件(SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina)进行统计分析。所有统计分析均采用alpha值0.05,p值等于或低于alpha值0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果急性阑尾炎与急性阑尾炎的一些典型症状和体征(反跳压痛、低烧、白细胞计数升高、厌食)无统计学意义。本回顾性分析CT扫描的敏感性为96%,特异性为75%,阳性预测值为98.5%,阴性预测值为50%,总有效率为95%。然而,在由经验丰富的放射科医生以盲法重新评估假阳性、假阴性和不确定的CT结果后,CT扫描的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值均有所增加(分别为97%、100%、100%和71%)。CT结果为阳性或阴性时,CT扫描与病理结果的相关性均有统计学意义(p = 0.0001)。结论临床表现不明确时应进行CT扫描,只有经验丰富的放射科医师才能诊断为阳性或阴性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信