Mechanical response of cervical vertebral endplates to axial loading.

Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie Pub Date : 2006-11-01 Epub Date: 2006-11-14 DOI:10.1055/s-2006-942279
J Schröder, M Herbort, P Rustemeyer, V Vieth, H Wassmann
{"title":"Mechanical response of cervical vertebral endplates to axial loading.","authors":"J Schröder,&nbsp;M Herbort,&nbsp;P Rustemeyer,&nbsp;V Vieth,&nbsp;H Wassmann","doi":"10.1055/s-2006-942279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>After anterior cervical discectomy the implantation of a spacer is common practice. The majority of these spacers are trapezoid titanium cages. During the development of a height-adjustable cervical implant we needed to establish the testing limits for this device. A known phenomenon is subsidence of the cage into the vertebral endplates, which leads to a decrease in height and/or angulation of the cervical spinal segment. In contrast to the thoracic and lumbar spines, there are only limited data concerning the load-bearing ability of cervical endplates. The aim of our investigation was to obtain these data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Bone density of 16 cervical vertebrae was estimated by quantitative computed tomography. After embedding of the vertebrae into PMMA, each endplate was slowly compressed until failure using a metal indenter resembling the form of a newly developed cervical implant. A fixed protocol with increasing loading cycles was followed. Endpoint was breakage of the endplate as established by failure to resist the increasing loading forces produced by the testing machine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean bone density of the 16 cervical vertebrae was 204 with a standard deviation of 52 mg Ca-HA/mL (range 130-281). The endplates failed with a mean loading of 1084 N +/- 314 (range 340-1550 N). The maximum load correlates with the bone density (R2 = 0.7347). With the 97.79 mm2 load bearing surface of the cage we calculate a mean cervical endplate break strength of 10.47 MPa and a 95 % confidence interval of 12.66-9.51 MPa. An initial settling produced by resting of the anchoring teeth in the cervical endplates was observed in 8 vertebrae at a load of 113 N (range 50-250 N).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In contrast to the thoracic and lumbar spines, cervical endplates show a lower resistance against axial forces. The data are important to understand postoperative cage subsidence and to establish testing limits for the development of new implant designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50708,"journal":{"name":"Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie","volume":"67 4","pages":"188-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2006-942279","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-942279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2006/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objective: After anterior cervical discectomy the implantation of a spacer is common practice. The majority of these spacers are trapezoid titanium cages. During the development of a height-adjustable cervical implant we needed to establish the testing limits for this device. A known phenomenon is subsidence of the cage into the vertebral endplates, which leads to a decrease in height and/or angulation of the cervical spinal segment. In contrast to the thoracic and lumbar spines, there are only limited data concerning the load-bearing ability of cervical endplates. The aim of our investigation was to obtain these data.

Methods: Bone density of 16 cervical vertebrae was estimated by quantitative computed tomography. After embedding of the vertebrae into PMMA, each endplate was slowly compressed until failure using a metal indenter resembling the form of a newly developed cervical implant. A fixed protocol with increasing loading cycles was followed. Endpoint was breakage of the endplate as established by failure to resist the increasing loading forces produced by the testing machine.

Results: The mean bone density of the 16 cervical vertebrae was 204 with a standard deviation of 52 mg Ca-HA/mL (range 130-281). The endplates failed with a mean loading of 1084 N +/- 314 (range 340-1550 N). The maximum load correlates with the bone density (R2 = 0.7347). With the 97.79 mm2 load bearing surface of the cage we calculate a mean cervical endplate break strength of 10.47 MPa and a 95 % confidence interval of 12.66-9.51 MPa. An initial settling produced by resting of the anchoring teeth in the cervical endplates was observed in 8 vertebrae at a load of 113 N (range 50-250 N).

Conclusions: In contrast to the thoracic and lumbar spines, cervical endplates show a lower resistance against axial forces. The data are important to understand postoperative cage subsidence and to establish testing limits for the development of new implant designs.

颈椎终板对轴向载荷的力学响应。
目的:颈前路椎间盘切除术后植入间隔器是一种常见的手术方法。这些垫片大多数是梯形钛笼。在高度可调颈椎植入物的开发过程中,我们需要建立该设备的测试限制。已知的一种现象是椎体终板内固定器下沉,导致颈椎节段高度和/或角度降低。与胸椎和腰椎相比,关于颈椎终板承重能力的数据有限。我们调查的目的是获得这些资料。方法:采用定量计算机断层扫描法对16例颈椎进行骨密度测定。将椎体嵌入PMMA后,使用类似于新开发的颈椎植入物的金属压头缓慢压缩每个终板,直到失败。采用固定的加载方案,增加加载周期。终点是端板的断裂,由于无法抵抗试验机产生的不断增加的载荷力而确定。结果:16个颈椎的平均骨密度为204,标准差为52 mg Ca-HA/mL(范围130 ~ 281)。终板失效时,平均载荷为1084 N +/- 314(范围340-1550 N)。最大载荷与骨密度相关(R2 = 0.7347)。在保持架承载面为97.79 mm2的情况下,计算出颈终板断裂强度均值为10.47 MPa, 95%置信区间为12.66 ~ 9.51 MPa。在113 N(范围50-250 N)的载荷下,在8个椎骨中观察到锚定牙在颈椎终板中休息产生的初始沉降。结论:与胸椎和腰椎相比,颈椎终板对轴向力的抵抗力较低。这些数据对于了解术后保持架下沉以及为开发新的种植体设计建立测试限制具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie
Zentralblatt Fur Neurochirurgie 医学-神经科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信