[A detection of very mild Alzheimer's disease and MCI by memory complaints and deterioration of IADL in a questionnaire for a memory clinic].

No to shinkei = Brain and nerve Pub Date : 2006-10-01
Megumi Ueda, Yutaka Takayama, Yoshie Koyama, Hisao Osada
{"title":"[A detection of very mild Alzheimer's disease and MCI by memory complaints and deterioration of IADL in a questionnaire for a memory clinic].","authors":"Megumi Ueda,&nbsp;Yutaka Takayama,&nbsp;Yoshie Koyama,&nbsp;Hisao Osada","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>There have been very few studies trying to explain about daily life features of patients with very mild Alzheimer disease (AD) and of those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The purpose of this study was 1) to clarify characteristics of very mild AD and MCI in their daily life, and 2) to examine items in a questionnaire that can be useful for detecting subjects of suspected AD.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Subjects were 111 patients of the memory clinic in National Center Hospital for Mental, Nervous, and Muscular Disorders, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Japan; 39 normal range, 28 MCI, and 44 very mild AD. On their first visits, they were asked to fill out a questionnaire consisted of 103 items. Thirty five items in a questionnaire were selected, 15 memory-complaint items and 20 items of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), and examined retrospectively. At first we compared each set of groups using the chi-square test. Then a logistic regression analysis was used to observe which items contributed to judge a person to be suspected of AD. And further, sensitivity and specificity for discriminating between an AD suspected and a normal range were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>None of the items showed statistical significance between MCI group and very mild AD group. Then, we combined these two groups into one group (n = 72), and made comparison between this new group and normal range group (n = 39). There were 18 items that showed statistical significance between the two groups. And five of them, 'dysfunction of memory: noticed by others', 'dysfunction of memory: getting worse', 'unable to utilize the memorandum', 'forget incidents occurred a few days ago' and 'unable to locate unfamiliar places' showed significantly high odds ratio in judgment on a person to be suspected of AD. In addition to preceding 5 items we adopted two items, 'dysfunction of memory: unnoticeable by her/himself' and 'unable to manage household expenses', which were not included in the logistic regression analysis, but were essential for the discrimination between the two groups. The sum of score of these 7 items showed high specificity and sensitivity for dividing between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings indicated that an exploration of memory complaints and deteriorations of IADL was useful for the detection of MCI and very mild AD, especially 7 items described above could be used as a simple questionnaire for the elderly.</p>","PeriodicalId":19163,"journal":{"name":"No to shinkei = Brain and nerve","volume":"58 10","pages":"865-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"No to shinkei = Brain and nerve","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: There have been very few studies trying to explain about daily life features of patients with very mild Alzheimer disease (AD) and of those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The purpose of this study was 1) to clarify characteristics of very mild AD and MCI in their daily life, and 2) to examine items in a questionnaire that can be useful for detecting subjects of suspected AD.

Subjects and methods: Subjects were 111 patients of the memory clinic in National Center Hospital for Mental, Nervous, and Muscular Disorders, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Japan; 39 normal range, 28 MCI, and 44 very mild AD. On their first visits, they were asked to fill out a questionnaire consisted of 103 items. Thirty five items in a questionnaire were selected, 15 memory-complaint items and 20 items of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), and examined retrospectively. At first we compared each set of groups using the chi-square test. Then a logistic regression analysis was used to observe which items contributed to judge a person to be suspected of AD. And further, sensitivity and specificity for discriminating between an AD suspected and a normal range were examined.

Results: None of the items showed statistical significance between MCI group and very mild AD group. Then, we combined these two groups into one group (n = 72), and made comparison between this new group and normal range group (n = 39). There were 18 items that showed statistical significance between the two groups. And five of them, 'dysfunction of memory: noticed by others', 'dysfunction of memory: getting worse', 'unable to utilize the memorandum', 'forget incidents occurred a few days ago' and 'unable to locate unfamiliar places' showed significantly high odds ratio in judgment on a person to be suspected of AD. In addition to preceding 5 items we adopted two items, 'dysfunction of memory: unnoticeable by her/himself' and 'unable to manage household expenses', which were not included in the logistic regression analysis, but were essential for the discrimination between the two groups. The sum of score of these 7 items showed high specificity and sensitivity for dividing between the two groups.

Conclusion: These findings indicated that an exploration of memory complaints and deteriorations of IADL was useful for the detection of MCI and very mild AD, especially 7 items described above could be used as a simple questionnaire for the elderly.

[在记忆诊所的一份调查问卷中,通过记忆抱怨和IADL恶化来检测非常轻微的阿尔茨海默病和MCI]。
背景和目的:很少有研究试图解释极轻度阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者和轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者的日常生活特征。本研究的目的是1)阐明极轻度AD和轻度认知障碍患者在日常生活中的特征,2)检查问卷中的项目,这些项目可用于检测疑似AD的受试者。研究对象和方法:研究对象为日本国立神经病学和精神病学中心国立精神、神经和肌肉疾病中心医院记忆门诊111例患者;39例正常范围,28例轻度认知障碍,44例非常轻微的AD。在他们第一次访问时,他们被要求填写一份包含103个项目的调查问卷。选取问卷中的35项,15项记忆抱怨和20项日常生活工具活动(IADL)进行回顾性检验。首先,我们使用卡方检验比较各组。然后使用逻辑回归分析来观察哪些项目有助于判断一个人是否患有AD。进一步,检测了区分疑似AD和正常范围AD的敏感性和特异性。结果:MCI组与极轻度AD组间各项指标均无统计学意义。然后将两组合并为一组(n = 72),并与正常范围组(n = 39)进行比较。两组间有18项差异有统计学意义。其中,“记忆功能障碍:被他人注意到”、“记忆功能障碍:越来越严重”、“无法利用备忘录”、“忘记几天前发生的事情”、“无法定位陌生的地方”5项在判断阿尔茨海默氏症疑似患者时表现出显著高的优势比。除了前面的5个项目外,我们还采用了“记忆功能障碍:不被她/她自己注意到”和“无法管理家庭开支”两个项目,这两个项目不包括在logistic回归分析中,但对两组之间的区分至关重要。7项评分之和对两组划分具有较高的特异性和敏感性。结论:探索记忆主诉和IADL恶化对轻度认知障碍和极轻度AD的诊断有重要意义,尤其是上述7项内容可作为老年人简易问卷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信